Case: Swafford v. Danka Office Imaging

2:05-cv-01599 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: 2005

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

None

Related Cases

EEOC v. Danka Office Imaging, District of Arizona (2005)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

Docket

Oct. 3, 2006

Oct. 3, 2006

Docket

Student Memo on Consolidation

None

None

Other

Resources

Docket

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT FILED (ESH) (Entered: 05/27/2005)

May 26, 2005

May 26, 2005

2

MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Patrick Swafford. (TLJ, ) (Entered: 07/09/2005)

July 7, 2005

July 7, 2005

3

ANSWER to Complaint by Danka Office Imaging Company, Inc.. (Brockelman, Kent) (Entered: 08/15/2005)

Aug. 15, 2005

Aug. 15, 2005

4

STIPULATION for Consolidation of Cases by Danka Office Imaging Company, Inc. (Brockelman, Kent) Modified on 8/19/2005 (KCS). DOCKET TEXT EDITED TO INCLUDE THE PROPOSED CONSOLIDATED CASE NUMBERS -- CV-05-1522 PHX EHC AND CV-05-1599 PHX MHM. (Entered: 08/16/2005)

Aug. 16, 2005

Aug. 16, 2005

5

CONSOLIDATION ORDER - MEMBER CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Earl H Carroll for all further proceedings. Judge Mary H Murguia terminated. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 8/24/05. Case consolidated CV 05-1599 PHX-MHM with lead case CV 05-1522 PHX- EHC, (Attachments: # 1 Letter).(LSP) (Entered: 08/26/2005)

Aug. 26, 2005

Aug. 26, 2005

6

FINAL JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Danka and against Plaintiff Swafford on all claims made by Plaintiff Swafford in this action. Judgment is also entered in favor of Danka and against Plaintiff Swafford for Danka's attorneys' fees in the amount of $25,000, with interest to run on all unpaid amounts at the statutory rate until paid in full. (Lead case CV 05-1522-PHX-EHC). Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 10/2/06. (LCF) (Entered: 10/03/2006)

Oct. 3, 2006

Oct. 3, 2006

Case Details

State / Territory: Arizona

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: 2005

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Case Details

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General:

Disparate Treatment