Case: EEOC v. Maytag Corp

1:04-cv-04632 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: 2004

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

None

Related Cases

Max v. Maytag Corp, Northern District of Illinois (2004)

People


Judge(s)

Guzman, Ronald A. (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Cohen, Ethan M.M. (Illinois)

Gochanour, Gregory M. (Illinois)

Hendrickson, John C. (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Caroline, Jolynn C (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:04-cv-04632

Docket [PACER]

EEOC, et al v. Maytag Corp

July 5, 2005

July 5, 2005

Docket

1:04-cv-04632

Complaint

EEOC, et al v. Maytag Corp

July 16, 2004

July 16, 2004

Complaint

Docket

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT; jury demand − Civil cover sheet − Appearance(s) of Ethan M.M. Cohen, Gregory M. Gochanour, John C. Hendrickson as attorney(s) for plaintiff (no summons(es) issued.) (Documents: (1−1 through 1−3)) (gma) (Entered: 07/16/2004)

July 15, 2004

July 15, 2004

2

WAIVER of service of summons as to defendant sent on 7/16/04. (gma) (Entered: 09/07/2004)

Sept. 3, 2004

Sept. 3, 2004

3

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Mark L. Shapiro, Todd David Steenson, Merideth C Nagel, Jolynn C Caroline; Notice. (gma) (Entered: 09/10/2004)

Sept. 9, 2004

Sept. 9, 2004

4

AGREED MOTION by defendant for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead ; Notice. (gma) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

Sept. 9, 2004

Sept. 9, 2004

5

MINUTE ORDER of 9/15/04 by Hon. William T. Hart: Status hearing set for 9/29/04 at 11:00 a.m. Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead is granted [4−1]. Mailed notice (gma) (Entered: 09/16/2004)

Sept. 15, 2004

Sept. 15, 2004

6

RULE 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) MOTION by defendant Maytag Corporation to dismiss case ; Notice. (gma) (Entered: 09/23/2004)

Sept. 20, 2004

Sept. 20, 2004

7

MEMORANDUM by defendant Maytag Corporation in support of its Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss case [6−1] (Attachments). (gma) (Entered: 09/23/2004)

Sept. 20, 2004

Sept. 20, 2004

8

MINUTE ORDER of 9/22/04 by Hon. William T. Hart: Answer brief to defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss case [6−1] due 9/29/04. Reply to answer brief due 10/6/04. Ruling on defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss will be by mail. Mailed notice (gma) (Entered: 09/23/2004)

Sept. 22, 2004

Sept. 22, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 9/29/04 by Hon. William T. Hart : Status hearing held and continued to 11:00 10/27/04 . Mailed notice (clw) (Entered: 09/29/2004)

Sept. 29, 2004

Sept. 29, 2004

9

RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to defendant's motion to dismiss case [6−1] (Attachments); Notice. (gma) (Entered: 09/30/2004)

Sept. 29, 2004

Sept. 29, 2004

10

REPLY MEMORANDUM by defendant Maytag Corp in support of its motion to dismiss case [6−1] (Attachments). (gma) (Entered: 10/07/2004)

Oct. 6, 2004

Oct. 6, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 10/22/04 by Hon. William T. Hart : Status hearing set for 10/27/04 is stricken since this case has been reassigned to Judge Guzman. Mailed notice (clw) (Entered: 10/22/2004)

Oct. 22, 2004

Oct. 22, 2004

11

REASSIGNMENT ORDER of 10/22/04 This case is reassigned to the Hon. Ronald A. Guzman from Hon. William T. Hart pursuant to Local Rule 40.4. Case related 1:04−cv−4617 with member cases 1:04−cv−4632. (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (gma) (Entered: 10/25/2004)

Oct. 22, 2004

Oct. 22, 2004

NOTICE of filing by plaintiff of consolidated amended complaint (Attachment). (Original in 04−C−4617) (ar) (Entered: 11/05/2004)

Nov. 2, 2004

Nov. 2, 2004

UNOPPOSED MOTION by Defendant Maytag Corporation for leave to file instanter its reply memorandum in support of the motion to dismiss. (Original in 04cv4617)(gma, ) (Entered: 01/26/2005)

Jan. 25, 2005

Jan. 25, 2005

13

REPLY memorandum by Defendant Maytag Corporation in support of its Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. (rbf, ) (Entered: 02/01/2005)

Jan. 28, 2005

Jan. 28, 2005

UNOPPOSED MOTION by Plaintiffs to adjust the pre−trial discovery schedule (Original in 04cv4632)Associated Cases: 1:04−cv−04632,1:04−cv−04617(gma, ) (Entered: 07/05/2005)

July 5, 2005

July 5, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: 2004

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Case Details

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment