Case: Settlement agreement between United States and the Township of Neville, Pennsylvania

NA | No Court

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

According to Allegheny Times, in 2000, a female Neville Township police dispatcher filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, complaining of sex discrimination over police department hiring of part-time police officers, choosing two male candidates with less experience, against the Township of Neville. Specifically, she alleged that the reason she was not hired was her gender.The charge was filed with the EEOC, under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The EEOC found r…

According to Allegheny Times, in 2000, a female Neville Township police dispatcher filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, complaining of sex discrimination over police department hiring of part-time police officers, choosing two male candidates with less experience, against the Township of Neville. Specifically, she alleged that the reason she was not hired was her gender.

The charge was filed with the EEOC, under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The EEOC found reasonable cause to believe that the plaintiff was discriminated against. After no satisfactory conciliation agreement was secured, the charge was referred to the DOJ.

The United States alleged gender discrimination against the complainant when she was not hired for the position of the part-time police officer in the Police Department, and when the defendant failed or refused to take appropriate action to remedy the effects of such discrimination.

The United States and the Township entered into a settlement agreement in 2007. Under the agreement, the Township agreed to implement selection procedures for full-time and part-time procedures in full compliance with Title VII, including, among others, advertising job openings and listing the minimum qualifications. The complainant was offered the position of the part-time police officer with a remedial seniority date of April 13, 2000, including salaries and benefits, and monetary damages in the amount of $15,000.

Summary Authors

Zhandos Kuderin (7/8/2014)

People


Attorney for Plaintiff

Acosta, R. Alexander (District of Columbia)

Fenton, William B. (District of Columbia)

Grant, Elaine J. (District of Columbia)

Mulroy, John A. (Pennsylvania)

Palmer, David J. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

Settlement Agreement

United States of America v. The Township of Neville, Pennsylvania

April 6, 2004

April 6, 2004

Settlement Agreement

Docket

Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 1:38 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Closing Date: 2009

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

United States government on behalf of a female police dispatcher, not hired for a position of part-time police officer on the basis of sex.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Township of Neville (Allegheny), None

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Special Case Type(s):

Out-of-court

Available Documents:

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Amount Defendant Pays: 15,000

Order Duration: 2007 - 2009

Content of Injunction:

Hire

Retroactive Seniority

Reasonable Accommodation

Discrimination Prohibition

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Utilize objective hiring/promotion criteria

Comply with advertising/recruiting requirements

Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention

Provide antidiscrimination training

Recordkeeping

Monitoring

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Pay / Benefits

Seniority

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female