Filed Date: April 5, 2005
Closed Date: Oct. 3, 2017
Clearinghouse coding complete
NOTE: This is one of three identically named cases in the Clearinghouse. For the 2005 case generally challenging the unnecessary institutionalization of individuals with disabilities in New Jersey, see Disability Rights New Jersey v. Velez (3:05-cv-04723). For the case challenging the long waitlists for community-based services, see Disability Rights New Jersey v. Velez (3:08-cv-01858).
On April 5, 2005, a non-profit organization representing approximately one thousand individuals confined in psychiatric hospitals in New Jersey filed a lawsuit against Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services under Due Process Clause, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The plaintiff, represented by public services counsel, asked the Court for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that the defendant failed to provide community placements for individuals currently residing in state psychiatric hospitals that had been adjudicated as no longer meeting the standards for civil commitment. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant had used the Conditional Extension Pending Placement ("CEPP") to confine individuals for excessive periods of time and has failed to implement an effective plan for discharging these individuals into the community, even though under New Jersey law, the state might use CEPP to continue confinement while the state was still developing an appropriate community placement.
On September 30, 2005, the Court (Judge Stanley R. Chesler) denied the defendant's motion to dismiss.
On July 29, 2009, after extended negotiations, the parties reached a settlement whereby the state agreed to place 1065 individuals in the community through FY 2014.
The agreement was initially set to last until 2014. But, by November 2014, the defendant was not set to meet the requirements of the consent decree. Judge Wolfson therefor extended the agreement until 2016. On March 2, 2017, the parties submitted a letter to the court notifying it of substantial compliancy by the defendants. The consent decree terminated and the case is now closed.
Summary Authors
Kunyi Zhang (3/1/2011)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5706352/parties/disability-rights-new-jersey-inc-v-velez/
Bongiovanni, Tonianne J. (New Jersey)
Chesler, Stanley R. (New Jersey)
Carr, Jeffrey A. (New Jersey)
Dodick, Helen C. (New Jersey)
Dacosta, David L (New Jersey)
Bongiovanni, Tonianne J. (New Jersey)
Chesler, Stanley R. (New Jersey)
Wolfson, Freda L. (New Jersey)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5706352/disability-rights-new-jersey-inc-v-velez/
Last updated March 2, 2024, 3:11 a.m.
State / Territory: New Jersey
Case Type(s):
Public Benefits/Government Services
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: April 5, 2005
Closing Date: Oct. 3, 2017
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
A non-profit corporation that serves as New Jersey’s protection and advocacy system for people with disabilities.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
NDRN/Protection & Advocacy Organizations
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
New Jersey Department of Human Services, State
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.
Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701
Constitutional Clause(s):
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration: 2009 - 2016