Filed Date: Feb. 24, 1966
Clearinghouse coding complete
On 2/24/1966, the plaintiffs brought this school desegregation case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The plaintiffs, African-American minor school children by and through their parents, sued the Beaufort County Board of Education to enjoin the operation of a segregated school system. They were represented by, among others, Jack Greenberg and Derrick A. Bell (for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund). In 1967, the North Carolina Teachers Association intervened as a plaintiff.
Prior to the filing of this case, the Board had taken minimal steps to desegregate in the wake of Brown v. Board of Education. Pursuant to the requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it devised a freedom-of-choice plan -- but apart from that, it took no action. On August 23, 1967, the district court (Judge John Larkins) entered an order governing desegregation for the 1967-68 school year, including freedom-of-choice and also some reassignment for both students and faculty. The Board did little to comply with the order and thus on August 5, 1968, the district court ordered the Board to implement a new desegregation plan, eliminating freedom of choice. As Judge Larkins concluded
The defendants are maintaining a racially dual public school system. Freedom of choice is an unconstitutional and impermissible means for desegregation for the Beaufort County Public Schools. It is therefore imperative that an order be entered directing that the defendants implement a plan consistent with the decisions of the Supreme Court.Boomer v. Beaufort County Board of Education, 294 F.Supp. 179 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 1968)
As part of the court's order, the Board was required to report on the racial breakdown of student and faculty assignments in the district's schools. After being fired and also examining those statistics, a number of black educators in the district brought their own lawsuit, alleging continued racial discrimination. On September 30, 1971, the district court held that the Board had failed to meet its faculty desegregation obligations and was continuing to discriminate on the basis of race with respect to hiring and firing decisions. The court ordered the Board to reinstate the fired educators with back pay and to take further steps to restore the racial balance of the district's faculty. James v Beaufort County Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 711 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 1971). The Fourth Circuit subsequently affirmed the district court. James v Beaufort County Board of Education, 465 F.2d 477 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 1972).
The district court dismissed the underlying school desegregation case in 1972. Unfortunately, we were not able to find any more details about -- or documents from -- the court's decision to close the case a mere four years after the implementation of the Board's non-freedom-of-choice plan.
Available Opinions
Boomer v. Beaufort County Board of Education, 294 F.Supp. 179 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 1968)
James v Beaufort County Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 711 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 1971)
James v Beaufort County Board of Education, 465 F.2d 477 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 1972)
Summary Authors
Greg Margolis (2/27/2017)
Blatt, Solomon Jr. (South Carolina)
Haynsworth, Clement Furman Jr. (South Carolina)
Chambers, J. LeVonne (New York)
Greenberg, Jack (New York)
Knott, Lee Jr. (North Carolina)
Blatt, Solomon Jr. (South Carolina)
Haynsworth, Clement Furman Jr. (South Carolina)
Larkins, John Davis Jr. (North Carolina)
Russell, Donald Stuart (South Carolina)
Last updated Feb. 18, 2024, 3:16 a.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: North Carolina
Case Type(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: Feb. 24, 1966
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Plaintiffs were African-American minor school children; the North Carolina Teachers Association also intervened as a plaintiff
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: Yes
Class Action Outcome: Granted
Defendants
Beaufort County, School District
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration: 1967 - 1972
Content of Injunction:
Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention
Issues
General:
Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)
Discrimination-area:
Discrimination-basis:
Race:
Type of Facility: