Case: Edmo v. Idaho Department of Correction

1:17-cv-00151 | U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho

Filed Date: April 6, 2017

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The plaintiff in this case is a transgender, Native American woman. She was incarcerated at facilities run by the Idaho Department of Corrections. Despite multiple attempts at self-castration, the Idaho Department of Corrections and its employees had denied her medically necessary care, refused to transfer her, and failed to provide accommodations for her to express her gender identity. The defendants refused to provide the plaintiff with hormone treatment and gender confirmation surgery. Because of this, the plaintiff attempted to castrate herself on two occasions. Additionally, employees at the facilities punished the plaintiff by placing her in solitary confinement when she attempted to express her gender identity by modifying her clothes and wearing her hair in a ponytail.

Represented by the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the plaintiff filed suit on April 6, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The initial complaint was handwritten. An amended complaint was filed in September 2017.

This complaint alleged that the Idaho Department of Corrections and its private contractor Corizon violated her Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment and her Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection. She alleged discrimination under the Fourteenth Amendment on the basis of sex as well as violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act for discrimination on the basis of disability. In addition to constitutional claims, she filed multiple state negligence claims. She requested injunctive, declaratory, and monetary relief in the form of compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees.

On June 1, 2018, Judge B. Lynn Winmill granted the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment with respect to the plaintiff’s negligence claims and the claims she brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. At this hearing the court also dismissed the plaintiff's request that the court enjoin the defendant to transfer the plaintiff to a female facility.

Over six months later, on December 13, 2018, the court granted the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction in part. The court ordered the defendants to provide adequate medical care and gender confirmation surgery as promptly as possible. 358 F.Supp.3d 1103. This order did not address injunctive relief regarding gender-appropriate clothing and commissary items because the Idaho Department of Corrections implemented a gender dysphoria policy addressing these requests on October 5, 2018. The defendants appealed the district court’s preliminary injunction to the Ninth Circuit on January 9, 2019.

Back in the district court, on January 31, 2019 the plaintiff filed another amended complaint. This complaint was very similar to the last one but removed the Eighth Amendment failure to protect from harm claim. Also in the district court, the defendants filed a motion to stay the December 13, 2018, order pending appeal, which Judge Winmill denied. 2019 WL 1027979.

While the case was on appeal in the Ninth Circuit, the plaintiff filed a motion in the district court for an indicative ruling pursuant to Rules 62.1 and 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This motion asked the court to make explicit findings that

the injunctive relief ordered ... [in the Court’s prior memorandum decision and order in this case] is narrowly drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct the violation of the federal right, is the least intrusive means necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right, and that there is no evidence that granting this relief will have any adverse impact on public safety or the operation of the criminal justice system.

Judge Winmill denied this motion as unnecessary because her prior memorandum complied with the Prison Litigation Reform Act's requirements for preliminary injunctive relief. 2019 WL 1546927.

In the Ninth Circuit, oral argument was held on May 16, 2019 before a panel comprised of Circuit Judges M. Margaret McKeown and Ronald M. Gould, and District Judge Robert S. Lasnik. On May 30, 2019, the Ninth Circuit remanded to the district court to address three issues. First, the district court needed to clarify if the order denying defendant's motion for stay pending appeal was meant to renew the preliminary injunction. Second, the court needed to clarify if its ruling on the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction also granted the plaintiff permanent injunctive relief. Finally, the court needed to clarify whether the plaintiff succeeded on the merits of her Eighth Amendment claim for permanent injunctive relief. In an opinion by Judge Winmill issued the next day, the court renewed the preliminary injunctive relief, clarified that the grant of preliminary injunctive relief also granted the plaintiff permanent injunctive relief, and clarified that the court had previously concluded that the plaintiff succeeded on the merits of her Eighth Amendment claim for permanent injunctive relief. 2019 WL 2319527. The defendants appealed this decision to the Ninth Circuit on July 1, 2019. The Ninth Circuit issued a per curiam opinion on August 23, 2019, affirming all the decisions of the district court. 935 F.3d 757.

On October 24, 2019, the district court issued an order requiring defendants to provide all pre-surgical treatments and corollary appointments or consultations necessary for gender confirmation surgery. The defendants filed yet another appeal on October 31, 2019, to the Ninth Circuit regarding Judge Winmill's October 24, 2019, order. The Ninth Circuit dismissed this appeal as moot. 2020 WL 13563486.

The same day, in the district court, the defendants filed an expedited motion to stay the court's October 24, 2019, order pending appeal. On November 8, 2019, Judge Winmill issued an opinion denying the defendant's expedited motion to stay. In this opinion, Judge Winmill deferred setting a deadline for the plaintiff to receive her first pre-surgical treatment and also allowed the court to hold a hearing on this limited issue. 2019 WL 5865620.

A hearing was held on November 21, 2019, before Judge Winmill. At the conclusion of this hearing, Judge Winmill reinstated her previous October 24, 2019, order and ordered that the plaintiff must begin receiving pre-surgical treatments no later than November 26, 2019.

The defendants requested rehearing in front of the Ninth Circuit en banc of the earlier August 23, 2019, affirmance. A split vote resulted in the Ninth Circuit denying rehearing en banc over the dissent of nine judges. 949 F.3d 489.

On March 2, 2020, the defendants filed a motion to stay litigation in the district court pending the defendants' forthcoming appeal to the United States Supreme Court. The plaintiff did not oppose the stay but requested limited exceptions necessary to preserve critical evidence. In April 2017, Judge Winmill issued an order granting the stay. In the order, Judge Winmill ordered the defendants to preserve all relevant evidence and to continue to provide Plaintiff with pre-surgical treatment as required by the October 24, 2019, order. 2020 WL 1907560.

On May 6, 2020, the defendants filed a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. The issues brought before the Supreme Court were

[w]hether the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that the guidelines set by an advocacy organization constitute the constitutional minima for inmate medical care under the Eighth Amendment, when the First, Fifth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have all concluded that they do not.

and

[w]hether the Ninth Circuit’s holding that a prison health care provider’s individualized medical decision was unreasonable and therefore constituted deliberate indifference, regardless of his subjective reasoning, conflicts with Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976) (holding that mere negligence does not establish deliberate indifference), and Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994) (holding the provider must have known of and disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm to find deliberate indifference).

On the same day, the defendant-petitioners submitted an application to stay the district court's order to Justice Kagan. On May 21, 2020, Justice Kagan denied the application for a stay. 140 S.Ct. 2800. And on October 13, 2020, the Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari. 141 S.Ct. 610. The stay was lifted by Judge Winmill on December 31, 2020. As such, the process of scheduling the plaintiff’s gender-affirming healthcare was resumed in accordance with the Court’s October 24, 2019 order.

On January 20, 2021, the case was set for settlement conference. On February 2, 2021, the Court granted the plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees. Because the case was ongoing, Judge Winmill ordered that the plaintiff should not enter a motion requesting fees until the case had concluded and the defendants retained the right to object to the reasonableness of the costs and fees awarded. The parties continued to litigate the appropriate attorney’s fees to be awarded.

On September 30, 2022, after extensive discovery and written and oral argument, the Court awarded the plaintiff $2,586,048.80 in attorney’s fees and an additional $45,544.20 in litigation expenses. The defendants appealed this decision to the Ninth Circuit on October 28, 2022. This appeal is ongoing as of April 2, 2023.

	Document
1:17-cv-00151 19-35017 19-35019 19-35552 19-35917	Docket	July 2, 2020	July 2, 2020 Docket
3 1:17-cv-00151	Civil Rights Complaint Edmo v. Idaho State Board of Corrections	April 6, 2017	April 6, 2017 Complaint
10 1:17-cv-00151	Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for a TRO and Preliminary Injunction	April 13, 2017	April 13, 2017 Pleading / Motion / Brief
43 1:17-cv-00151	Memorandum in Support of IDOC Defendants' First Motion for Dispositive Relief	Nov. 1, 2017	Nov. 1, 2017 Pleading / Motion / Brief
66 1:17-cv-00151	Memorandum Decision and Order	June 7, 2018	June 7, 2018 Order/Opinion 2018 WL 2018
129 1:17-cv-00151	Memorandum Decision and Order	Oct. 9, 2018	Oct. 9, 2018 Order/Opinion 2018 WL 2018
149 1:17-cv-00151	Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order	Dec. 13, 2018	Dec. 13, 2018 Order/Opinion
172 1:17-cv-00151	Third Amended Complaint	Jan. 31, 2019	Jan. 31, 2019 Complaint
175 1:17-cv-00151	Memorandum Decision and Order	March 4, 2019	March 4, 2019 Order/Opinion 2019 WL 2019
193 1:17-cv-00151	Memorandum Decision and Order Edmo v. Idaho Department of Corrections	April 9, 2019	April 9, 2019 Order/Opinion 2019 WL 2019

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Edmo v. Idaho Department of Correction	After a three-day evidentiary hearing on Ms. Edmo’s motion for a preliminary injunction, Judge B. Lynn Winmill issued an order on December 13, 2018 requiring IDOC and IDOC’s medical provider Corizon …	Oct. 14, 2020	Oct. 14, 2020 https://www.nclrights.org/...
Fact Sheet: Protecting and Advancing Health Care for Transgender Adult Communities Caroline Medina	New data and analysis reveal important health disparities and barriers to care for transgender adults and what can be done to address these issues.	Aug. 25, 2021	Aug. 25, 2021 https://www.americanprogress.org/...

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Adree Edmo. Responses due by 4/27/2017 (jp) (Entered: 04/07/2017)	April 6, 2017	April 6, 2017 PACER
2	Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account, This is a sealed document. re 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adree Edmo. (jp) (Entered: 04/07/2017)	April 6, 2017	April 6, 2017 PACER
3	COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Adree Edmo. (Attachments: # 1 complaint continued, # 2 complaint continued, # 3 complaint continued)(jp) (Entered: 04/07/2017) 1 complaint continued View on PACER 2 complaint continued View on PACER 3 complaint continued View on PACER	April 6, 2017	April 6, 2017 Clearinghouse
4	EXHIBITS TO COMPLAINT by Plaintiff Adree Edmo re 3 Complaint. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits continued, # 2 Exhibits continued)(jp) (Entered: 04/07/2017) 1 Exhibits continued View on PACER 2 Exhibits continued View on PACER	April 6, 2017	April 6, 2017 PACER
5	MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Adree Edmo. Responses due by 4/28/2017 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Affidavit in support, # 3 Exhibits)(jp) (Entered: 04/07/2017) 1 Memorandum in Support View on PACER 2 Affidavit in support View on PACER 3 Exhibits View on PACER	April 6, 2017	April 6, 2017 PACER
6	MOTION for Service by a US Marshalby Plaintiff Adree Edmo. Responses due by 4/27/2017 (jp) (Entered: 04/07/2017)	April 6, 2017	April 6, 2017 PACER
7	MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction ( Responses due by 4/27/2017)by Plaintiff Adree Edmo. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in support, # 2 proposed order)(jp) (Entered: 04/07/2017) 1 Affidavit in support View on PACER 2 proposed order View on PACER	April 6, 2017	April 6, 2017 PACER
8	ORDER of Conditional Filing - (jp)	April 7, 2017	April 7, 2017 PACER
9	NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to Adree Edmo re 3 Complaint (jp)	April 7, 2017	April 7, 2017 PACER
10	MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of 7 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Adree Edmo.(cjs)	April 13, 2017	April 13, 2017 Clearinghouse
11	ORDER FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS AND WITHDRAWAL OF INMATE FILING FEE FROM PRISON TRUST ACCOUNT. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 1 is GRANTED. The Director of the Idaho Department of Correction or his designee shallcollect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the $350.00 balance of thefiling fee and shall forward payments to the Clerk of Court. (Notice sent to Finance). Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (A copy of this order has been mailed to the Director of the Idaho Dept. of Correction.)(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)	April 14, 2017	April 14, 2017 PACER
12	INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff may proceed on (1) her Eighth Amendment medical treatment claims, her related negligence or medical malpractice claims, and her equal protection claims, against Defendants Corizon, Kempf, Craig, Siegert, Yordy, Eliason, Young, and Whinnery. Defendants Corizon, Kempf, Craig, Siegert, Yordy, Eliason, Young, and Whinnery shall be allowed to waive service of summons by executing, or having their counsel execute, the Waiver of Service of Summons and returning it to the Court within 30 days. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 5 is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent that court staff shall begin a search for pro bono counsel for Plaintiff. Because the Court will allow Defendants an opportunity to waive service of process, Plaintiff's Motion for Service by a U.S. Marshal 6 is MOOT. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) Modified on 4/14/2017 - Due to time of order being docketed, mailings will go out on Monday 4/17/2017 (st).	April 14, 2017	April 14, 2017 PACER
13	COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service. I certify that I caused a copy of the following documents to be mailed to the following named persons: copies of Complaint (dkt #3), Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (dkt #7), Order (dkt #12), and attached Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons: Mark Kubinski, Idaho Department of Corrections, 1299 North, Orchard, Ste. 110, Boise, ID 83706 and a copy of Order (dkt #12) and a copy of the attached Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons to: Adree Edmo #94691, ISCI, PO Box 14, Boise, ID 83707(st)	April 17, 2017	April 17, 2017 PACER
14	COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service. I certify that I caused a copy of the following documents to be mailed to the following named persons: copies of Complaint (dkt #3), Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (dkt #7), Order (dkt #12), and attached Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons: Kevin West and Dylan Eaton, Parsons Behle & Latimer, 800 W. Main Street,, Suite 1300, Boise, ID 83702 and Order (dkt #12) and a copy of the attached Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons to: Adree Edmo #94691, ISCI, PO Box 14, Boise, ID 83707(st)	April 17, 2017	April 17, 2017 PACER
15	NOTICE of Appearance by Brady James Hall on behalf of Richard Craig, Kevin Kempf, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy (Hall, Brady)	May 12, 2017	May 12, 2017 PACER
16	WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Richard Craig, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy, Kevin Kempf. Richard Craig waiver sent on 4/19/2017, answer due 6/19/2017; Rona Siegert waiver sent on 4/19/2017, answer due 6/19/2017; Howard Keith Yordy waiver sent on 4/19/2017, answer due 6/19/2017; Kevin Kempf waiver sent on 4/19/2017, answer due 6/19/2017. (Hall, Brady)	May 12, 2017	May 12, 2017 PACER
17	NOTICE of Appearance by Dylan Alexander Eaton on behalf of Corizon Incorporated, Scott Eliason, Catherine Whinnery, Murray Young (Eaton, Dylan)	May 17, 2017	May 17, 2017 PACER
18	WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Murray Young, Catherine Whinnery, Corizon Incorporated, Scott Eliason. Murray Young waiver sent on 4/17/2017, answer due 6/16/2017; Catherine Whinnery waiver sent on 4/17/2017, answer due 6/16/2017; Corizon Incorporated waiver sent on 4/17/2017, answer due 6/16/2017; Scott Eliason waiver sent on 4/17/2017, answer due 6/16/2017. (Eaton, Dylan)	May 17, 2017	May 17, 2017 PACER
20	MOTION for Leave to Amend 3 Complaint by Plaintiff Adree Edmo. Responses due by 6/7/2017. (cjs) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/19/2017: # 1 Proposed Amended Complaint part 1 of 4, # 2 Proposed Amended Complaint part 2 of 4, # 3 Proposed Amended Complaint part 3 of 4, # 4 Proposed Amended Complaint part 4 of 4) (cjs). (Entered: 05/19/2017) 1 Proposed Amended Complaint part 1 of 4 View on PACER 2 Proposed Amended Complaint part 2 of 4 View on PACER 3 Proposed Amended Complaint part 3 of 4 View on PACER 4 Proposed Amended Complaint part 4 of 4 View on PACER	May 17, 2017	May 17, 2017 PACER
19	NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Corizon Incorporated, Richard Craig, Scott Eliason, Kevin Kempf, Rona Siegert, Catherine Whinnery, Howard Keith Yordy, and Murray Young re 17 Notice of Appearance and 15 Notice of Appearance Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 7/18/2017. (km) Modified on 5/19/2017 (km). Modified on 5/22/2017 to remove pdf docs that were attached in error (jp).	May 19, 2017	May 19, 2017 PACER
21	Corporate Disclosure Statement by Corizon Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Corizon Health, Inc. for Corizon Incorporated.. (Eaton, Dylan)	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2017 PACER
22	RESPONSE to Motion re 20 MOTION to Amend/Correct 3 Complaint filed by Corizon Incorporated, Scott Eliason, Catherine Whinnery, Murray Young. Replies due by 6/21/2017.(Eaton, Dylan)	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2017 PACER
23	RESPONSE to Motion re 20 MOTION to Amend/Correct 3 Complaint filed by Richard Craig, Kevin Kempf, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy. Replies due by 6/21/2017.(Hall, Brady)	June 7, 2017	June 7, 2017 PACER
24	ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND AND ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend 20 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file the Amended Complaint (currently Dkt. 20-1 through Dkt. 20-4) as a separate docket entry in this case. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, as well as to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Order, within 21 days after entry of this Order. This case is REASSIGNED to the Hon. B. Lynn Winmill, Chief United States District Judge. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) (Entered: 06/09/2017)	June 8, 2017	June 8, 2017 RECAP
25	AMENDED COMPLAINT against Corizon Incorporated, Richard Craig, Scott Eliason, Idaho State Board of Corrections, Kevin Kempf, David McClusky, Robin Sandy, Rona Siegert, Catherine Whinnery, Cindy Wiison, Howard Keith Yordy, and Murray Young, filed by Adree Edmo. (Attachments: # 1 amended complaint continued, # 2 amended complaint continued, # 3 amended complaint continued)(st) (Entered: 06/09/2017) 1 amended complaint continued View on PACER 2 amended complaint continued View on PACER 3 amended complaint continued View on PACER	June 8, 2017	June 8, 2017 RECAP
	DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change. Per Order (docket #24), this case has been reassigned to Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Please use case number 1:17-cv-00151-BLW on all future pleadings. (st)	June 9, 2017	June 9, 2017 PACER
	Notice of Case Number Change	June 9, 2017	June 9, 2017 PACER
26	NOTICE of Appearance by Craig Durham on behalf of Adree Edmo (Durham, Craig)	June 19, 2017	June 19, 2017 RECAP
27	NOTICE of Appearance by Deborah A Ferguson on behalf of Adree Edmo (Ferguson, Deborah)	June 19, 2017	June 19, 2017 PACER
28	Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (cjs)	June 19, 2017	June 19, 2017 PACER
29	STIPULATION and joint motion to vacate and reset filing deadlines by Adree Edmo. (Durham, Craig)	June 22, 2017	June 22, 2017 RECAP
30	ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: The parties' Joint Motion and Stipulation to Vacate and Reset Deadlines (Dkt. 29 ) is GRANTED. The parties shall follow the deadlines set forth in the Stipulation. Pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 7 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Motions terminated: 7 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Adree Edmo. (km)	June 23, 2017	June 23, 2017 PACER
	The 60 day deadline has expired. Case will remain with District Judge. No more notice of availability will be sent out. Consent deadline(s) termed. (cjs)	July 19, 2017	July 19, 2017 PACER
	Expired 60 Day ddl re Consents	July 19, 2017	July 19, 2017 PACER
31	MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Amy Whelan. ( Filing fee $ 225 receipt number 0976-1629026.)Craig Durham appearing for Plaintiff Adree Edmo. Responses due by 9/20/2017 (Durham, Craig)	Aug. 30, 2017	Aug. 30, 2017 PACER
32	MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Lori E. Rifkin. ( Filing fee $ 225 receipt number 0976-1629035.)Craig Durham appearing for Plaintiff Adree Edmo. Responses due by 9/20/2017 (Durham, Craig)	Aug. 30, 2017	Aug. 30, 2017 PACER
33	DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving 31 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Amy Whelan for Adree Edmo; approving 32 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Lori E Rifkin for Adree Edmo. Per General Order 206, out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)	Aug. 30, 2017	Aug. 30, 2017 PACER
34	MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Dan Stormer. ( Filing fee $ 225 receipt number 0976-1629433.)Craig Durham appearing for Plaintiff Adree Edmo. Responses due by 9/21/2017 (Durham, Craig)	Aug. 31, 2017	Aug. 31, 2017 PACER
35	DOCKET ENTRY ORDER approving 34 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorney Dan Stormer for Adree Edmo. Per General Order 206, out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)	Aug. 31, 2017	Aug. 31, 2017 PACER
36	AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second) and Exhibits A & B in Support against All Defendants, filed by Adree Edmo. (Attachments: # 1 Summons re Defendant Jeff Zmuda)(Rifkin, Lori) 1 Summons re Defendant Jeff Zmuda View on PACER	Sept. 1, 2017	Sept. 1, 2017 RECAP

Case: Edmo v. Idaho Department of Correction

1:17-cv-00151 | U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho

Case Summary

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Resources

Docket

Case Details