University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
view search results
page permalink
Case Name Gayle v. Meade IM-FL-0029
Docket / Court 1:20-cv-21553 ( S.D. Fla. )
State/Territory Florida
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Special Collection COVID-19 (novel coronavirus)
Attorney Organization Legal Services/Legal Aid
Southern Poverty Law Center
Case Summary
COVID-19 Summary: This class action lawsuit for declaratory, injunctive and habeas relief, brought on behalf of detainees in civil immigration detention at three ICE detention centers in Florida. The petitioners sought a writ of habeas corpus, requesting the immediate release of all individuals in ... read more >
COVID-19 Summary: This class action lawsuit for declaratory, injunctive and habeas relief, brought on behalf of detainees in civil immigration detention at three ICE detention centers in Florida. The petitioners sought a writ of habeas corpus, requesting the immediate release of all individuals in custody, as well as a declaration that continued detention violated the Due Process Clause, and an order prohibiting the respondents from placing new detainees in detention. The court partially granted the petitioners’ temporary restraining order, ordering ICE to implement CDC sanitation guidelines and to review detainees for potential release, and then on June 6, granted a preliminary injunction. On July 17, the court appointed a Special Master to oversee compliance, adopting his recommendations in March 2021. Also in March 2021, plaintiffs became aware of a vaccination plan defendants had received in January but had not presented to the court. By April 13, 2021, the parties had reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which will remain in place for six months following the final order in this case. A fairness hearing was scheduled for October 29, 2021.


On April 13, 2020, a group of 34 civil immigration detainees at three Florida detention centers within the jurisdiction of the Miami Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) filed this federal class action lawsuit and petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Petitioners were represented by University of Miami School of Law’s immigration clinic, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Rapid Defense Network, Legal Aid Service of Broward County, and private counsel. Petitioner-plaintiffs ("the petitioners") challenged the detention of noncitizens in South Florida as the spread of COVID-19 in ICE detention centers. The petitioners' cause of action arose under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.; the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C §§ 701 et seq.; and the federal habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2441. The case was assigned to Judge Marcia G. Cooke and referred to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman.

First, the petitioners alleged that their Fifth Amendment Due Process rights were violated when the respondents failed to follow the CDC guidelines for social distancing, disinfecting, or recommended hygiene practices. They alleged that ICE’s 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards (“PBNDS”) and National Detention Standards (”NDS”) required the respondents to follow CDC guidelines, and that a failure to do so violated the APA and the Due Process Clause. Second, the petitioners alleged that the respondents’ continued detention of the petitioners was excessive in relation to any government purpose and that the petitioners were deliberately indifferent to their health and safety, which was a violation of their Due Process rights. Third, the petitioners alleged that their detention violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause because respondents affirmatively subjected petitioners to an unreasonable risk of danger with deliberate indifference to employing policies that drastically increased the risk of petitioners’ contracting COVID-19.

The petitioners sought to certify a class of all individuals in civil immigration detention, as of April 13, 2020, at three Florida detention centers: Krome Service Processing Center, Broward Transitional Center, and Glades County Detention Center. Petitioners also sought to certify the following subclasses:
- Sub-class A: detained individuals with a stable location and/or place of residency in which they can self-quarantine and practice social distancing and hygiene pursuant to the CDC guidelines and Exec. Order No. 20-91 upon release.
- Sub-class B: all other detained individuals without access to a stable location and/or place of residency in which they can self-quarantine and practice social distancing and hygiene pursuant to CDC guidelines and Exec. Order No. 20-91 upon release.

The petitioners sought a writ of habeas corpus for immediate release of all individuals in the custody of ICE's three Florida detention centers, as well as declaratory and injunctive relief against unconstitutional conditions of confinement.

On the same day, the petitioners also filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and a motion for a preliminary injunction. They requested the court to enjoin the respondents from transferring detainees in or out of the three detention centers and to order the respondents to implement CDC health guidelines and protocols, and to release petitioners into community-based alternatives to detention.

On April 22, 2020, Magistrate Judge Goodman recommended the court grant in part the petitioners’ motion for a temporary restraining order and recommended 13 specific measures the court could take. 2020 WL 1949737. The court adopted in part Magistrate Judge Goodman's Report and Recommendation on April 30, 2020. 2020 WL 2086482. The court ordered ICE to:
1. Evaluate each of the named petitioners consistent with its regulations and inform the court which of the petitioners could be released by May 7, 2020.
2. Submit a report by May 3, 2020 describing how it intends to accelerate its review of its protocols resulting in release of detained individuals with the goal of reducing the population to 75% of capacity by May 14, 2020.
3. File weekly reports every Friday with information on the detained individuals ICE is releasing.
4. File twice-weekly reports containing information on the detained individuals remaining in custody.
5. Comply “immediately” with the CDC and ICE guidelines on providing adequate amounts of soap, water, and cleaning materials. ICE must have provided masks by May 2, 2020.
6. Provide appropriate training to its staff and detained individuals on the risks of COVID-19.

Judge Cooke clarified the April 30 temporary restraining order on May 2, 2020, stating that the order included all named petitioners in the action and that ICE could still transfer detainees from all three facilities after first evaluating them and determining their eligibility for release. 2020 WL 2203576.

On May 15, 2020, the court extended the temporary restraining order for an additional 14 days pending Magistrate Judge Goodman's Report and Recommendations on petitioners' motion for class certification and further hearing on the matter.

On May 20, 2020, the petitioners filed a motion to compel compliance with the court's temporary restraining order, alleging that ICE had failed to comply with the court's order and CDC guidelines.

On May 22, 2020, Magistrate Judge Goodman recommended that Judge Cook grant the class certification for the claims concerning conditions of confinement and for declaratory relief, but deny it for habeas corpus claims for release stating that those claims did not meet the commonality element because each release decision requires individual evaluation.

The court held a remote hearing on the motion to compel and on May 28, Judge Cooke extended the temporary restraining order from April 30 for another seven days.

On May 29, Magistrate Judge Goodman recommended the court deny the motion for class certification as to the requests for release, but grant class certification as to the other claims. Both parties filed objections to this report on June 3.

On June 6, Judge Cooke certified the class as "all current civil immigration detainees who are now held by ICE at Krome, BTC, and Glades when this action was filed, since this action was filed, or in the future." Judge Cooke granted the preliminary injunction, requiring ICE to comply with all ICE and CDC guidelines, including providing soap, hand sanitizer, and masks to detainees, and to limit transportation. The injunction also required ICE to educate detainees on mask-wearing and other prevention and to submit weekly reports to the court regarding the number of detainees being held and their detention status. 106 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1595.

On June 16, the plaintiffs filed a motion to compel compliance with the June 6 order, stating that the facilities were not implementing social distancing and not educating detainees on the importance of masks.

On July 5, the court granted the motion to compel compliance and appointed a Special Master, Michael B. Chavies of Akerman LLP, "to assess whether ICE is committing an ongoing violation of the detainees’ constitutional rights.” The Special Master would have the authority to request any records, physically inspect the three facilities and take photos and videos of the conditions inside. The court vacated that order the following day and didn't issue another order on the motion until July 17, this time appointing Matthew C. Dates of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson P.A. as Special Master instead. 2020 WL 4047334.

Between July and September, several plaintiffs moved for release or home confinement, but none of the motions were granted. Several individuals also successfully moved to intervene.

On January 4, 2021, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that they are entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs’ deliberate indifference claim because they've acted reasonably to implement measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 at Krome, BTC, and Glades. As to the due process claim, they argue it should be dismissed for failure to state a claim since the CDC Guidelines are not regulations with the force and effect of law. Finally, they argue that the state created danger claim also fails to state a claim for the same reason that the deliberate indifference claim fails. Plaintiffs responded on February 2, 2021, alleging that defendants ignored substantial evidence, including evidence recognized by the court in previous rulings, that contradict their claims for why summary judgment should be granted.

On January 21, 2021, the court denied an emergency motion to intervene for a plaintiff that had been deported to Guatemala. The Court held that it did not retain jurisdiction over class members that had been deported out of the United States, so the motion to intervene was moot.

On February 8, 2021, the court ordered that the Special Master give plaintiffs' counsel full access to his report on or before February 19, 2021, and file a redacted version of the Special Master’s report and recommendations on CM/EMF. This report details the investigations that the Special Master made during the summer of 2020 into the conditions at these facilities. On February 26, the plaintiff's filed a partial objection to the special master's report and recommendation, in which they pointed out that the report did not address one of the issues that the plaintiffs pointed out, namely that the facility was placing people who had tested positive for COVID-19 together with those who had not tested positive for COVID-19. On March 26, 2021, based on this report, the court issued an order denying in part and granting in part the petitioner's emergency motion to compel compliance with the courts June 6, 2020, preliminary injunction. This order affirmed and adopted the Special Masters report and its recommendations, which included defendants addressing their lack of proper social distancing.

On March 24, 2021, the court issued an order denying respondents' motion for reconsideration of the court's grant of a preliminary injunction.

Throughout the spring of 2021, discovery and attempts at mediation remained ongoing as plaintiffs filed for release or to remove themselves from the case as their circumstances changed. Specifically, on April 7, 2021, Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman issued a
Report and Recommendation on plaintiff's request for a second rule 30(b)(6) deposition in which he recommended that their request be granted. Plaintiffs requested this second deposition in response to the fact that defendants had received a formal, written vaccination plan, effective January 25, 2021, but which plaintiffs did not become aware of until March 9, 2021. Defendants filed several motions with the court between January and March but failed to give any indication that this plan existed, despite its relevance to plaintiffs' core allegation that defendants are, and have been, deliberately indifferent to plaintiffs’ medical and health risks from the COVID-19 virus. On April 11, Judge Cooke issued an order adopting Judge Goodman's report and recommendations. The 30(b)(6) depositions were limited to two hours per designee and must be taken by April 19, 2021. Additionally, on April 12, Judge Cooke ordered that on or before April 19, the parties update her on whether the case would be mooted if ICE vaccinated the detainees at all of the facilities at issue in this case.

On April 13, 2021, the parties issued a joint notice of a proposed settlement agreement, and a motion to suspend all pretrial deadlines and the trial date. Defendants also filed an unopposed motion to seal proposed settlement agreement, which was granted on April 16.

On April 16, 2021, the court issued an order administratively closing the case, since the parties had reached a proposed settlement agreement. All pending motions were denied as moot, and all pretrial deadlines and the trial date were canceled. On April 23, a status report was issued detailing the vaccinations of detainees that were taking place at Glades Detention Center and Broward Transitional Center. Defendants continued to provide first bi-weekly, then monthly status reports detailing the vaccinations of detainees from late April through August 2021.

On June 28, 2021, the parties filed a settlement agreement under seal and filed a joint motion for preliminary approval of settlement agreement and scheduling of fairness hearing. On June 29, defendants filed a motion to unseal the settlement agreement, and on July 3, all of these motions were referred to Judge Jonathan Goodman, who granted the order to unseal the settlement agreement on July 6.

The terms of the settlement agreement were:
1. Members of the class retain the right to pursue individual habeas petitions and motions for release.
2. Detention facilities will comply with all current, applicable ICE Pandemic Response Requirements (PRR) and Center for Disease Control (CDC) Guidelines.
3. The COVID-19 Vaccination Guidelines and Protocol shall be fully implemented, and vaccinations for both COVID-19 and seasonal influenza will be made freely available free of charge at all three detention facilities involved in this suit.
4. The detention facilities will provide educational materials on COVID-19 vaccination and safety precautions in multiple appropriate languages.
5. Limits placed on the population density allowed at these facilities, ordered that social distancing would be maintained whenever possible, ordered the facilities to implement proper testing and quarantine procedures, and ordered that the facilities keep residents informed of any ongoing quarantining efforts.
6. Staff will take all necessary cleaning and sanitation precautions around the facility, especially when transferring the use of objects between detainees and during mealtimes. 7. The detention facilities will provide unlimited soap and hand sanitizer and appropriate masks to all detainees at no cost and all staff must wear PPE when interacting with ICE detainees.
8. The detention facilities shall maintain all existing limitations on transfers, as required by the ICE PRR and the preliminary injunction, and shall implement proper testing and safety guidelines before and during the transfer of a detainee.
9. Detainees shall be provided with instructions in their primary language about how they can request and receive their own medical records, and as long as social visitation is not allowed, all detainees shall have access to telephones and/or other electronic devices for standard (audio) and/or video calling.
10. Defendants shall continue making their weekly certification regarding the detention
population.

These terms were set to remain in place for six months following the entry of the final order, or until each detainee who was remaining in one of the detention facilities at the time the final order was entered, had been given an opportunity to be vaccinated. Both sides could petition to adjust the agreement as the situation related to COVID-19 developed and changed.

A status hearing was held on July 14, and the court ordered the parties file to an amended motion for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement with a proposed report and recommendations by August 9, 2021. This report was filed on August 9, recommending that the court grant the joint motion for preliminary approval of settlement agreement and scheduling of a fairness hearing. Defendants filed an objection on August 11, and plaintiffs filed a response to that objection on August 16. On September 14, 2021, the court issued an order adopting the report and recommendation, and on September 20, a fairness hearing was scheduled for October 29, 2021.

Elena Malik - 05/20/2020
Caitlin Kierum - 07/05/2020
Chandler Hart-McGonigle - 11/26/2020
Tessa McEvoy - 10/06/2021


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Due Process: Substantive Due Process
Content of Injunction
Goals (e.g., for hiring, admissions)
Preliminary relief granted
Reporting
COVID-19
CDC Guidance ordered implemented
Contact tracing ordered
COVID testing ordered/modified
COVID vaccination ordered
Mitigation Denied
Mitigation Granted
Mitigation Requested
PPE-ordered provided to prisoners for free
PPE-ordered worn by staff
Quarantine/isolation ordered
Release Denied
Release Requested
Release-process created/modified
Sanitizer/Handsoap ordered made available/used
Social distancing ordered
Transfer-ordered or process created/modified
Wellness/temperature checks ordered
Defendant-type
Corrections
Law-enforcement
General
Bathing and hygiene
Classification / placement
Conditions of confinement
Food service / nutrition / hydration
Habeas Corpus
Sanitation / living conditions
Totality of conditions
Immigration/Border
Constitutional rights
Detention - conditions
Medical/Mental Health
Medical care, general
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Special Case Type
Habeas
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)
Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens
Habeas Corpus, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2253; 2254; 2255
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Defendant(s) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Miami Field Office
Plaintiff Description All current civil immigration detainees who are now held by ICE at Krome, BTC, and Glades when this action was filed, since this action was filed, or in the future.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations Legal Services/Legal Aid
Southern Poverty Law Center
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status outcome Pending
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief Litigation
Order Duration 2020 - n/a
Filed 04/13/2020
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
  Judge Abruptly Reverses Order to Have a Fact-Finder Investigate South Florida ICE Jails
miamiherald.com
Date: Jul. 6, 2020
By: Monique Madan
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  With Lives of Immigrant Detainees at Risk to COVID-19, Federal Judge Forces ICE's Hand
prisonlegalnews.org
Date: Jul. 1, 2020
By: Christopher Zoukis
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Court Docket(s)
S.D. Fla.
09/27/2021
1:20−cv−21553−MGC
IM-FL-0029-9000.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
S.D. Fla.
04/13/2020
Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 1, 1-2, 1-3]
IM-FL-0029-0007.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
04/13/2020
Petitioners Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction for Proposed Class and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [ECF# 4]
IM-FL-0029-0001.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
04/22/2020
Report and Recommendations on Emergency Motion for Injunctive Relief [ECF# 63] (2020 WL 1949737)
IM-FL-0029-0002.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
04/30/2020
Order Adopting in Part Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF# 76] (2020 WL 2086482)
IM-FL-0029-0003.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/02/2020
Order on Petitioners' Motion for Clarification [ECF# 78] (2020 WL 2203576)
IM-FL-0029-0004.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/05/2020
Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Expedited Motion for Class Certification, Request for Expedited Consideration, and Memorandum of Law in Support [ECF# 81]
IM-FL-0029-0005.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/09/2020
Respondents' Opposition to Motion for Class Certification [ECF# 92]
IM-FL-0029-0006.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/12/2020
Reply in Support of Motion for Class Certification [ECF# 94, 94-1]
IM-FL-0029-0008.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/18/2020
Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Memorandum Regarding Money v. Pritzker in Response to Post-Hearing Administrative Order [ECF# 103]
IM-FL-0029-0009.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/20/2020
Petitioners' Emergency Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's April 30, 2020 Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 106, 106-1, 106-2, 106-3, 106-4]
IM-FL-0029-0010.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/22/2020
Report and Recommendations on Class Certification Motion [ECF# 111]
IM-FL-0029-0011.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/25/2020
Respondents' Response to Petitioners' Emergency Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's April 30, 2020 Order [ECF# 116, 116-1, 116-2]
IM-FL-0029-0012.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/26/2020
Reply in Support of Petitioners' Emergency Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's April 30, 2020 Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 118]
IM-FL-0029-0013.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
05/29/2020
Amended Report and Recommendations on Class Certification Motion [ECF# 123]
IM-FL-0029-0014.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
06/03/2020
Respondents' Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendations on Class Certification [ECF# 143]
IM-FL-0029-0015.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
06/03/2020
Petitioners' Objection to Amended Report and Recommendation Concerning Class Certification [ECF# 144]
IM-FL-0029-0016.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
06/06/2020
Omnibus Order [ECF# 158] (2020 WL 3041326)
IM-FL-0029-0017.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
06/16/2020
Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's June 6, 2020 Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 163]
IM-FL-0029-0018.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
07/05/2020
Order Granting Petitioners' Emergency Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's June 6, 2020 Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 192]
IM-FL-0029-0019.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
07/17/2020
Order Appointing Special Master [ECF# 219] (2020 WL 4047334)
IM-FL-0029-0020.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
01/04/2021
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 484]
IM-FL-0029-0021.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
01/21/2021
Order on Emergency Motion to Intervene [ECF# 515]
IM-FL-0029-0022.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
02/02/2021
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 532]
IM-FL-0029-0023.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
02/16/2021
Order Following Special Master's Notice and Recommendation [ECF# 551]
IM-FL-0029-0024.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
02/19/2021
Special Master Report and Recommendation [ECF# 560]
IM-FL-0029-0025.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
02/25/2021
Plaintiffs' Partial Objection to Special Master's Report and Recommendation [ECF# 565]
IM-FL-0029-0030.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
03/24/2021
Order Denying Respondents' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Grant of a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 608] (2021 WL 1255627)
IM-FL-0029-0028.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
03/25/2021
Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part Petitioners' Emergency Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's June 6, 2020 Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 611] (2021 WL 1255317)
IM-FL-0029-0026.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
04/07/2021
Report and Recommendations on Request for Second Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition (With Extremely Accelerated Objections Deadline) [ECF# 633]
IM-FL-0029-0029.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
04/11/2021
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [ECF# 639] (2021 WL 1377872)
IM-FL-0029-0031.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
04/16/2021
Order Administratively Closing Case Upon Notice of Settlement [ECF# 645]
IM-FL-0029-0032.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
04/23/2021
Defendants' Status Report Regarding Vaccinations of Detainees [ECF# 653]
IM-FL-0029-0033.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
06/28/2021
Settlement Agreement [ECF# 697-1]
IM-FL-0029-0027.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
06/28/2021
Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement and Scheduling of Fairness Hearing [ECF# 698]
IM-FL-0029-0034.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
08/09/2021
Report and Recommendations on Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement [ECF# 729] (2021 WL 4973521)
IM-FL-0029-0036.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
S.D. Fla.
09/14/2021
Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF# 748] (2021 WL 4973523)
IM-FL-0029-0035.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Cooke, Marcia G. (E.D. Mich., S.D. Fla.) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0003 | IM-FL-0029-0004 | IM-FL-0029-0017 | IM-FL-0029-0019 | IM-FL-0029-0020 | IM-FL-0029-0026 | IM-FL-0029-0028 | IM-FL-0029-0031 | IM-FL-0029-0032 | IM-FL-0029-0035 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Goodman, Jonathan (S.D. Fla.) [Magistrate] show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0002 | IM-FL-0029-0011 | IM-FL-0029-0014 | IM-FL-0029-0022 | IM-FL-0029-0024 | IM-FL-0029-0029 | IM-FL-0029-0036 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Monitors/Masters Dates, Matthew Clarence (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0025 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Alcaro, Gregory Vincent (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Bell, Drew Thompson (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-0030 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Berger, Mitchell Wayne (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Berlow-Lehner, Lisa M (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Cariglio, Gennaro Jr (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Chavez, Paul (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Coberly, Jennifer Rae (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Copeland, Gregory Paul (New York) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Dominguez, Anthony Richard (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Edson, Scott Michael (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-0027 | IM-FL-0029-0030 | IM-FL-0029-0034 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Fleischman, Maia (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Gillman, Sarah Telo (New York) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Hujber, Richard Arpad (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Kegerreis, Sharon L (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Lehman, Kathryn Stewart (Georgia) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-0027 | IM-FL-0029-0030 | IM-FL-0029-0034 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Lerner, Romy Louise (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Montavon−McKillip, Andrea (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Norris, Allison (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Osberg-Braun, Linda Marguerite (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Perdomo, Erica (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Peterson, Chad Andrew (Georgia) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-0030 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Prada, Mark Andrew (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Ross, Ian M (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Sharpless, Rebecca (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0001 | IM-FL-0029-0005 | IM-FL-0029-0007 | IM-FL-0029-0008 | IM-FL-0029-0009 | IM-FL-0029-0010 | IM-FL-0029-0013 | IM-FL-0029-0016 | IM-FL-0029-0018 | IM-FL-0029-0023 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Trese, Patrick Farrell (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Barr, William P. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Celone, Michael Anthony (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Diaz, Natalie (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0006 | IM-FL-0029-0012 | IM-FL-0029-0015 | IM-FL-0029-0021 | IM-FL-0029-0027 | IM-FL-0029-0033 | IM-FL-0029-0034 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Gonzalez, Juan Antonio (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0027 | IM-FL-0029-0033 | IM-FL-0029-0034
Lee, Dexter (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0006 | IM-FL-0029-0012 | IM-FL-0029-0015 | IM-FL-0029-0021 | IM-FL-0029-0027 | IM-FL-0029-0033 | IM-FL-0029-0034 | IM-FL-0029-9000
Orshan, Ariana Fajardo (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-0006 | IM-FL-0029-0012 | IM-FL-0029-0015 | IM-FL-0029-0021
Quintana, Kayla Keller (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Other Lawyers Arias, Maggie (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Armada, Francisco (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Keller, Kayla Nicole (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Kilissanly, Megan Nicole (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Klco, Sara Michele (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000
Pereira, Eduardo Xavier (Florida) show/hide docs
IM-FL-0029-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
view search results
page permalink

- top of page -