This complaint was brought in the County of Multnomah Circuit Court for the State of Oregon on July 29, 2020. The suit was brought by the ACLU of Oregon and an anonymous individual plaintiff ("Protester 1") against the City of Portland. The plaintiffs were represented by attorneys from the ACLU of Oregon and private counsel. The complaint came amidst police crackdowns on protests against police brutality that arose following the killing of George Floyd.

According to the complaint, the Portland Police Bureau (PPB) had been livestreaming the protests. Yet, the plaintiffs argued, this violated Oregon state law, which prohibited the collection of information about protesters political, religious, or social views. PPB argued that the livestreams fell into one of the narrow exceptions of this law that allowed for such data collection if they pertain to criminal investigations. However, the complaint alleged that PPB wrote in an email that they used to livestreams to inform the public about the protests. Additionally, in a 1988 consent decree the PPB agreed to follow the provisions of that law in exchange for the ACLU's assurance not to litigate data collection that occurred prior to 1988. Therefore, the plaintiffs in this case argued that the PPB was in violation of both the Oregon state law and the 1988 consent decree by collecting such information on protesters. They sought declaratory relief and temporary, preliminary, and permanent injunctive relief that would prohibit the PPB from recording protests unless it was in pursuit of a criminal investigation.

The next day, Judge Stephen Bushong granted the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO). However, the order did not prohibit the livestreaming, only the "collecting or maintaining" of the videos complained about by the plaintiffs. Judge Bushong also clarified that the order does not apply to failure to disperse orders given by the police.

The case is ongoing as of August 12, 2020

Jack Hibbard - 08/12/2020


compress summary