University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Gomez v. Trump IM-DC-0090
Docket / Court 1:20-cv-01419 ( D.D.C. )
Additional Docket(s) 20-cv-1926  [ 20-1926 ]  District of DC (U.S.)
20-cv-1856  [ 20-1856 ]  District of DC (U.S.)
20-cv-1907  [ 20-1907 ]  District of DC (U.S.)
20-cv-2128  [ 20-2128 ]  District of DC (U.S.)
State/Territory District of Columbia
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Special Collection Civil Rights Challenges to Trump Travel Ban Orders
COVID-19 (novel coronavirus)
Attorney Organization American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)
Case Summary
This case involves a dispute about visa processing. Following a March 20, 2020 decision by the State Department to cease most visa services, President Trump issued Presidential Proclamation 10014 on April 20, suspending the entry of all immigrants into the U.S. for two months, unless they qualified ... read more >
This case involves a dispute about visa processing. Following a March 20, 2020 decision by the State Department to cease most visa services, President Trump issued Presidential Proclamation 10014 on April 20, suspending the entry of all immigrants into the U.S. for two months, unless they qualified for an exception. Two months later, the entry suspension was extended to December 31, 2020 and expanded to include temporary nonimmigrant visas in Proclamation 10052. As a result, the State Department suspended review and adjudication of visas for non-excepted applicants (the No-Visa Policy).

Many groups were affected, including diversity lottery (DV-2020) winners who had not yet been issued a visa and who would not have their eligibility carry over into the next year, and minors who would age out of the preferential treatment for which they were eligible.

On May 28, 2020, U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents who had sponsored noncitizen minor children or other relatives for immigrant visas filed this class action lawsuit against President Trump, the State Department, and the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, with Judge Amit P. Mehta presiding. The plaintiffs sought a preliminary and permanent injunction preventing the government from acting to “deny or refuse consideration” of their visa petitions, a declaration that the Proclamations were unlawful, and attorney’s fees. They sued under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. § 706) and the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. §§ 1182, 1185) and alleged that the defendants’ conduct exceeded their authority and violated the plaintiffs’ rights under the Due Process Clause.

The plaintiffs moved to certify a class of visa sponsors whose beneficiaries or derivative beneficiaries were subject to the Proclamations and at risk of aging out on June 2.

On June 23, Judge Mehta denied the plaintiffs' motions for a preliminary injunction and class certification because they failed to show that a justiciable case or controversy existed. Specifically, Judge Mehta found that the plaintiffs had not shown that they faced imminent injury because some of the plaintiffs’ minor beneficiaries had successfully applied for visas under the “national interest exception” (a separate administrative procedure), and others had been unable to apply for visas for reasons unrelated to the Proclamations. 2020 WL 3429786.

The plaintiffs then amended their complaint on July 17, 2020, adding as plaintiffs corporations that were unable to hire necessary workers because workers’ visas had not been issued along with diversity visa selectees whose visas had to issue by September 30 to remain eligible for entry. They also proposed the following four subclasses:

1. Those who will be unable to receive their diversity visas before Sept. 30 deadline, and will thus be unable to immigrate.

2. Citizens who have sponsored an immediate relative who now cannot immigrate.

3. Lawful permanent residents who have an “approved immigrant visa petition for a preference relative” who, because of the Proclamations, will be unable to immigrate.

4. U.S. employers whose employees or potential employees cannot now immigrate.

Several states and the District of Columbia also filed an amicus brief arguing that immigrants were good for their economies and that the presidential action would hurt their recovery.

Three other suits filed between July 10, 2020 and August 5, 2020 were fully consolidated with this case on August 13: Aker v. Trump, No. 20-cv-1926; Mohammed v. Pompeo, No. 20-cv-1856; and Fonjong v. Trump, No. 20-cv-2128. In all of these cases, the plaintiffs were diversity visa selectees and derivative beneficiaries challenging Presidential Proclamations 10014 and 10052 under the APA; two (Mohammed and Fonjong) were filed by the same law firm.

Judge Mehta also partially consolidated Panda v. Wolf, No. 20-cv-1907, with this case to the extent that Panda raised similar issues. Panda involved an APA challenge to Proclamation 10052 but also included an equal protection argument that the government's conduct disparately impacted Indian nationals. On September 16, Judge Mehta denied the Panda plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction in the part of that case continuing separately. 2020 WL 5545554. The Panda plaintiffs appealed, and on September 29, Panda was stayed pending the outcome of the appeal.

Following the consolidation, many influential companies filed an amicus brief as well, arguing that they would suffer serious economic harm from the proclamations. The companies included Adobe, Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Paypal, Reddit, Twitter, Uber Technologies, and Zillow.

The plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on August 23, 2020, adding a claim under the Mandamus Act (28 U.S.C. § 1361) and requesting that the court issue an order of mandamus requiring defendants to adjudicate visa petitions.

On September 4, 2020, Judge Mehta granted the DV-2020 plaintiffs a preliminary injunction. The defendants were ordered to “undertake good-faith efforts . . . to expeditiously process and adjudicate DV-2020 diversity visas.” Defendants were preliminarily enjoined “from interpreting and applying the COVID Guidance to DV-2020 selectees” in such a way as not to process their visas because they were not “mission critical.” The remaining motions and requests were not granted. The court also delayed certifying a class, and the non DV-2020 plaintiffs did not obtain injunctive relief because vacatur of the policy would not eliminate their family separation problem. 2020 WL 5367010.

On September 14, 2020, the court amended the preliminary injunction to prevent the State Department from waiting 14 days to issue visas to DV-2020 applicants who were inside certain COVID-affected regions because the delay served no rational purpose. 2020 WL 5886855. On September 24, 2020, non DV-2020 plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit over the ruling against their motion for a preliminary injunction.

On September 30, 2020, the court certified a class in Gomez consisting of all “Individuals who have been selected to receive an immigrant visa through the U.S. Department of State’s FY2020 Diversity Visa Lottery and who had not received their immigrant visa on or before April 23, 2020, when the Presidential Proclamation 10014, later extended by Presidential Proclamation 10052, took effect.” But the court declined to certify a class in Aker because it was unclear how many applicants who were issued visas before the Proclamation had not been able to have them renewed, and because there was no legal impediment to renewing a visa. It also ordered the State Department to reserve 9,095 visas (calculated based on the expected reduction due to COVID-19) to correct for the loss of visas due to the illegal processing delays. 2020 WL 5861101.

This case is ongoing.

Samuel Poortenga - 10/02/2020


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Due Process: Procedural Due Process
Due Process: Substantive Due Process
Equal Protection
Right to travel
Content of Injunction
Preliminary relief granted
Defendant-type
Jurisdiction-wide
Discrimination-basis
Immigration status
National origin discrimination
General
Family reunification
Government Services (specify)
Juveniles
Wait lists
Immigration/Border
Admission - criteria
Admission - procedure
Constitutional rights
Employment
Family
Refugees
Undocumented immigrants - rights and duties
Visas - criteria
Visas - procedures
National Origin/Ethnicity
Indian
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Mandamus, 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Defendant(s) Acting Secretary
President of the United States
Secretary of State
Plaintiff Description Individuals and corporations who have been unable to gain visas for themselves or others due to Presidential Proclamations 10014 and 10052. Class Definition: “Individuals who have been selected to receive an immigrant visa through the U.S. Department of State’s FY2020 Diversity Visa Lottery and who had not received their immigrant visa on or before April 23, 2020, when the Presidential Proclamation 10014, later extended by Presidential Proclamation 10052, took effect.”
Indexed Lawyer Organizations American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status outcome Granted
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief Litigation
Filed 05/28/2020
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
  2020 DV Lottery Information Page
Law Office of Curtis Morrison
Date: Oct. 29, 2020
By: Curtis Morrison Law
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Frequently Asked Questions About Gomez v. Trump
American Immigration Lawyers Association
Date: Oct. 21, 2020
By: American Immigration Lawyers Association
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Status of Current Challenges to Presidential Proclamations
Joseph & Hall P.C.
Date: Aug. 4, 2020
By: Joseph & Hall P.C.
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Executive Order on Resuming the United States Refugee Admissions Program with Enhanced Vetting Capabilities
White House
Date: Oct. 24, 2017
By: United States
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats
www.whitehouse.gov
Date: Sep. 24, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Implementing Executive Order 13780 Following Supreme Court Ruling -- Guidance to Visa-Adjudicating Posts
Reuters
Date: Jun. 28, 2017
By: U.S. Department of State
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence
The White House
Date: Jun. 14, 2017
By: Donald Trump (White House)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States
Date: Mar. 6, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (President of the United States)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Memorandum to the Acting Secretary of State, the Acting Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security
The White House
Date: Feb. 1, 2017
By: Donald F. McGahn II, Counsel to the President (The White House)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Statement by Acting Attorney General Sally Yates
https://www.nytimes.com/
Date: 1/30/2017
By: Acting Attorney General Sally Yates (Department of Justice)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Statement By Secretary John Kelly on the Entry of Lawful Permanent Residents into the United States
https://www.dhs.gov/
Date: 1/29/2017
By: DHS Secretary John Kelly (Department of Homeland Security)
Citation: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/01/29/statement-secretary-john-kelly-entry-lawful-permanent-residents-united-states
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  OLC Memo Re: Proposed Executive Order Entitled "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States"
Date: Jan. 27, 2017
By: Curtis Gannon (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order: Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States
Federal Register
Date: Jan. 27, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

Court Docket(s)
D.D.C.
08/13/2020
1:20-cv-01926-APM
IM-DC-0090-9002.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/13/2020
1:20-cv-02128-APM
IM-DC-0090-9003.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/29/2020
1:20-cv-01907
IM-DC-0090-9001.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/30/2020
1:20-cv-01419-APM
IM-DC-0090-9000.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
02/18/2021
1:20-cv-01856
IM-DC-0090-9004.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
D.D.C.
05/28/2020
Complaint [ECF# 1]
IM-DC-0090-0001.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
06/23/2020
Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF# 41] (2020 WL 3429786)
IM-DC-0090-0002.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
07/10/2020
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus [ECF# 1]
IM-DC-0090-0016.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
07/14/2020
Complaint [ECF# 1]
IM-DC-0090-0023.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
07/15/2020
Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Their Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 3-1]
IM-DC-0090-0024.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
07/16/2020
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus [ECF# 1]
IM-DC-0090-0020.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
07/17/2020
First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus [ECF# 5]
IM-DC-0090-0017.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
07/17/2020
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 8 & 8-1 to 8-51]
IM-DC-0090-0018.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
07/17/2020
First Amended Complaint [ECF# 46]
IM-DC-0090-0014.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
07/31/2020
Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 53]
IM-DC-0090-0003.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/03/2020
Order [ECF# 26]
IM-DC-0090-0019.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/04/2020
Order [ECF# 19]
IM-DC-0090-0021.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/05/2020
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus [ECF# 1]
IM-DC-0090-0015.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/07/2020
[Brief of Several States as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs] [ECF# 58]
IM-DC-0090-0004.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/10/2020
Plaintiffs' Supplemental Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 66]
IM-DC-0090-0005.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/12/2020
Amicus Brief of Leading Companies and Business Organizations in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 82]
IM-DC-0090-0007.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/13/2020
Amended Order [ECF# 79]
IM-DC-0090-0006.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
08/23/2020
Second Amended Complaint [ECF# 111]
IM-DC-0090-0008.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/04/2020
Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF# 123] (485 F.Supp.3d 145)
IM-DC-0090-0009.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/14/2020
Amended Order [ECF# 132] (486 F.Supp.3d 445)
IM-DC-0090-0010.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/16/2020
Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF# 36] (487 F.Supp.3d 48)
IM-DC-0090-0022.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Source: Westlaw
D.D.C.
09/16/2020
Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF# 36] (487 F.Supp.3d 48)
IM-DC-0090-0026.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/16/2020
Plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal [ECF# 37]
IM-DC-0090-0025.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/24/2020
Notice of Appeal [ECF# 139]
IM-DC-0090-0011.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/25/2020
Plaintiffs' Joint Submission Regarding Further Relief [ECF# 146]
IM-DC-0090-0012.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
D.D.C.
09/30/2020
Memorandum Opinion and Amended Order [ECF# 151] (490 F.Supp.3d 276)
IM-DC-0090-0013.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Bates, John D. (D.C. Circuit, FISC, D.D.C.) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0021
Mehta, Amit Priyavadan (D.D.C.) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0002 | IM-DC-0090-0006 | IM-DC-0090-0009 | IM-DC-0090-0010 | IM-DC-0090-0013 | IM-DC-0090-0019 | IM-DC-0090-0022 | IM-DC-0090-0026 | IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9001 | IM-DC-0090-9002 | IM-DC-0090-9003 | IM-DC-0090-9004
Plaintiff's Lawyers Banias, Bradley (South Carolina) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0023 | IM-DC-0090-0024 | IM-DC-0090-0025 | IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9001
Barre, Abadir (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0015 | IM-DC-0090-0016 | IM-DC-0090-0017 | IM-DC-0090-0018 | IM-DC-0090-9003
Barre, Abadir Jama (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9004
Bless, Jesse (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Claffey, Danielle M. (Georgia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0020
Cunnings, Jordan (Oregon) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Dahab, Nadia H. (Oregon) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Forney, Geoffrey (Pennsylvania) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0023 | IM-DC-0090-0024 | IM-DC-0090-0025 | IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9001
Hellgren, Tess (Oregon) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Hoq, Laboni Amena (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Ingber, Matthew D (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Joseph, Jeff (Colorado) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0020 | IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9002
Kuck, Phillip C (Georgia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0020
Kuck, Charles H. (Georgia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0020 | IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9002
Manning, Stephen W. (Oregon) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Morrison, Curtis Lee (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0015 | IM-DC-0090-0016 | IM-DC-0090-0017 | IM-DC-0090-0018 | IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9003 | IM-DC-0090-9004
Pincus, Andrew J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Siskind, Gregory H. (Tennessee) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0020
Sung, Esther (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Tumlin, Karen C. (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Urena, Rafael N (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0015 | IM-DC-0090-0016 | IM-DC-0090-0017 | IM-DC-0090-0018 | IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9004
Wasden, Jonathan (South Carolina) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0023 | IM-DC-0090-0024
Welton, Cleland B II (- International -) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0001 | IM-DC-0090-0003 | IM-DC-0090-0004 | IM-DC-0090-0005 | IM-DC-0090-0008 | IM-DC-0090-0011 | IM-DC-0090-0012 | IM-DC-0090-0014 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Caplen, Robert Aaron (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9002 | IM-DC-0090-9004
Chang, William (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Girdharry, Glenn M. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000 | IM-DC-0090-9001
Goldsmith, Aaron S. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9001
Lyerla, Christopher Thomas (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Press, Joshua S. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9001
Walker, Johnny Hillary III (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Wen, James J (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
York, Thomas Benton (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Other Lawyers Appelbaum, John M. (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Balderas, Hector (New Mexico) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Becerra, Xavier (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Beninati, Nancy A (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Connors, Clare E. (Hawaii) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Dasgupta, Anisha (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Delery, Stuart F. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0007 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Dettmer, Ethan D. (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0007 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Donovan, Thomas J. Jr. (Vermont) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Downer, William H. (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Ellison, Keith (Minnesota) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Ferguson, Robert W. (Washington) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Ford, Aaron D. (Nevada) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Frey, Aaron M (Maine) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Frosh, Brian E. (Maryland) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Grewal, Gurbir S. (New Jersey) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Hampe, Carl W. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Healey, Maura T. (Massachusetts) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Herring, Mark R. (Virginia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
James, Letitia (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Jennings, Kathleen (Delaware) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Joseph, Lawrence J (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Kaul, Josh (Wisconsin) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Murdukhayeva, Ester (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Neronha, Peter F. (Rhode Island) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Nessel, Dana M. (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Newman, Michael L. (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Olson, Theodore B. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0007
Pierce, Daniel P. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Racine, Karl A. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Raoul, Kwame (Illinois) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Rodriguez, Leon (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Rosenblum, Ellen F. (Oregon) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Scherb, Matthew Alex (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Schnitzer, David Ari (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0007 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Shapiro, Joshua D. (Pennsylvania) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Soleimani, Jonathan N. (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0007 | IM-DC-0090-9000
Taliaferro, John David (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-9000
Tong, William (Connecticut) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Underwood, Barbara D. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004
Weiser, Philip J. (Colorado) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0090-0004

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -