Case: Williams v. San Francisco

CGC-20-587008 | California state trial court

Filed Date: Oct. 7, 2020

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is about law enforcement use of illegally accessed real-time surveillance footage to monitor demonstrators following the killing of George Floyd. The plaintiffs, Black and Latino residents of San Francisco who participated in protests against police violence in May and June of 2020, filed this action on October 7, 2020, in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant, the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD), used a netw…

This case is about law enforcement use of illegally accessed real-time surveillance footage to monitor demonstrators following the killing of George Floyd. The plaintiffs, Black and Latino residents of San Francisco who participated in protests against police violence in May and June of 2020, filed this action on October 7, 2020, in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant, the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD), used a network of surveillance cameras to spy on protestors in real-time, in violation of the City of San Francisco’s Acquisition of Surveillance Technology Ordinance (Ordinance), which was passed in response to claims that the SFPD disregarded departmental orders that required reasonable suspicion before surveilling on activities protected by the First Amendment. The Ordinance required that a city department obtain approval and establish a specific use policy prior to acquiring surveillance technology unless there were exigent circumstances. Despite that, the defendant allegedly acquired real-time surveillance footage from 400 cameras for approximately seven days. Represented by the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief as well as attorneys’ fees.

Both parties moved for summary judgment. On February 9, 2022, Judge Ulmer granted the defendant’s motion, finding. Judge Ulmer found that the Ordinance allowed city departments to continue using surveillance technology if they had been using it prior to the Ordinance’s passage until a separate ordinance were enacted that governed the department’s surveillance policy. Because no such separate ordinance had been enacted and because the SFPD used the same cameras during the 2019 San Francisco Pride celebration, Judge Ulmer concluded that the defendant was entitled to continue using that technology. 

The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on March 25, 2022. As of December 22, 2022, that appeal is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Claire Butler (12/30/2022)

People


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Cagle, Matthew T (California)

Hussain, Saira (California)

Rathi, Mukund (California)

Schwartz, Adam Jeffrey (California)

Attorney for Defendant

McGrath, Aileen M. (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

CGC-20-587008

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Oct. 7, 2020

Oct. 7, 2020

Complaint

CGC-20-587008

Orders on Summary Judgment Motions

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

Order/Opinion

Docket

Last updated Jan. 26, 2024, 1:39 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
07394745

OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS, COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR AS TO DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR MAR-10-2021 PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON DEC-07-2020 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT DUE ON FEB-16-2021 Fee: $450.00

Oct. 7, 2020

Oct. 7, 2020

07394743

NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF

Oct. 7, 2020

Oct. 7, 2020

07403393

SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT (TRANSACTION ID # 66022161), PROOF OF SERVICE ONLY, FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR SERVED OCT-07-2020, PERSONAL SERVICE AS TO DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Oct. 14, 2020

Oct. 14, 2020

07429627

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT (TRANSACTION ID # 66087053) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Fee: EXEMPT

Nov. 6, 2020

Nov. 6, 2020

07503252

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (TRANSACTION ID # 66262527) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Jan. 15, 2021

Jan. 15, 2021

07518368

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT (TRANSACTION ID # 66294603) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Jan. 29, 2021

Jan. 29, 2021

07534647

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66331095) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ESTIMATED TIME FOR TRIAL: 3.0 DAYS

Feb. 11, 2021

Feb. 11, 2021

07545959

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66360233) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR ESTIMATED TIME FOR TRIAL: 3.0 DAYS

Feb. 22, 2021

Feb. 22, 2021

07545960

PROOF OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE (TRANSACTION ID # 66360233) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Feb. 22, 2021

Feb. 22, 2021

07551965

NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE OF TRIAL, COURT TRIAL SET FOR FEB-22-2022 AT 9:30 AM IN DEPT. 206. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ON MAR-10-2021 IS OFF CALENDAR. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.

Feb. 25, 2021

Feb. 25, 2021

FEE PAID ON: STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER (TRANSACTION ID # 66825023) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Fee: EXEMPT

Aug. 5, 2021

Aug. 5, 2021

07759295

ORDER ON STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Aug. 12, 2021

Aug. 12, 2021

07764104

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER/NOTICE OF RULING FILED ON STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66853875) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Aug. 16, 2021

Aug. 16, 2021

07793543

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL MUKUND RATHI (TRANSACTION ID # 66917942) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE REYES, NESTOR

Sept. 9, 2021

Sept. 9, 2021

07802844

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO HEARING SET FOR DEC-17-2021 AT 09:30 AM IN DEPT 302 Fee: EXEMPT

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802845

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802846

DECLARATION OF WAYNE SNODGRASS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802847

DECLARATION OF OLIVER LIM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802848

DECLARATION OF ASJA STEEVES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802849

SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802850

STIPULATION OF FACT (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

COURT REPORTING SERVICES LESS THAN 1 HOUR (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Fee: EXEMPT

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802852

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL (TRANSACTION ID # 66935878) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802905

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT **COURT REPORTER FEES PAID** (TRANSACTION ID # 66939474) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR HEARING SET FOR DEC-17-2021 AT 09:30 AM IN DEPT 302 Fee: $530.00

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802906

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66939474) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802907

SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66939474) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802910

PROOF OF SERVICE BY FILE AND SERVEXPRESS (TRANSACTION ID # 66939474) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07802912

COMPENDIUM OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 66939507) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

07847594

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67038466) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

07847595

SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS (UNDISPUTED MATERIAL) IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67038466) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

07847596

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS (TRANSACTION ID # 67038466) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

07847794

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67038677) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

07847795

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL (TRANSACTION ID # 67038677) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

07847796

SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67038677) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

07847797

COMPENDIUM OF EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67038677) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

07887370

REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67113542) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Nov. 19, 2021

Nov. 19, 2021

07887371

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF WAYNE SNODGRASS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67113542) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Nov. 19, 2021

Nov. 19, 2021

07887372

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL (TRANSACTION ID # 67113542) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Nov. 19, 2021

Nov. 19, 2021

07887417

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67113576) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Nov. 19, 2021

Nov. 19, 2021

07887418

REPLY TO DEFENDANT?S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS? SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT?S ADDITIONAL (TRANSACTION ID # 67113576) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Nov. 19, 2021

Nov. 19, 2021

07887419

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL (TRANSACTION ID # 67113576) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Nov. 19, 2021

Nov. 19, 2021

FILING FEE ONLY PAID FOR STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER RE: SCHEDULE FOR HEARING OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67156682) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR Fee: $20.00

Dec. 9, 2021

Dec. 9, 2021

07909221

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL (TRANSACTION ID # 67156682) FILED BY PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Dec. 9, 2021

Dec. 9, 2021

07915880

ORDER ON STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR HEARING OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Dec. 15, 2021

Dec. 15, 2021

MINI MINUTES FOR DEC-17-2021 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302

Dec. 17, 2021

Dec. 17, 2021

MINI MINUTES FOR DEC-17-2021 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302

Dec. 17, 2021

Dec. 17, 2021

LAW & MOTION, DEPT. 302, AS TO THE DEC-17-2021 HEARING RE: DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, THE COURT ADOPTS ITS TENTATIVE RULING. MATTER IS CONTINUED TO JANUARY 14, 2022 PER STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER, JR.; CLERK: SEAN KANE; COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO, CSR NO. 8600, EMAIL: MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM. (302/RBU)

Dec. 17, 2021

Dec. 17, 2021

LAW & MOTION, DEPT. 302, AS TO THE DEC-17-2021 HEARING RE: PLAINTIFFS HOPE WILLIAMS, NATHAN SHEARD, AND NESTOR REYES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, THE COURT ADOPTS ITS TENTATIVE RULING. MATTER IS CONTINUED TO JANUARY 14, 2022 PER STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER, JR.; CLERK: SEAN KANE; COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO, CSR NO. 8600, EMAIL: MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM. (302/RBU)

Dec. 17, 2021

Dec. 17, 2021

MINI MINUTES FOR JAN-14-2022 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302

Jan. 14, 2022

Jan. 14, 2022

MINI MINUTES FOR JAN-14-2022 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302

Jan. 14, 2022

Jan. 14, 2022

LAW & MOTION, DEPT. 302, AS TO THE JAN-14-2022 HEARING RE: DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, THE COURT ADOPTS ITS TENTATIVE RULING. MATTER IS CONTINUED TO JANUARY 21, 2022 ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION. JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER, JR.; CLERK: SEAN KANE; COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO, CSR NO. 8600, EMAIL: MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM (302/RBU)

Jan. 14, 2022

Jan. 14, 2022

LAW & MOTION, DEPT. 302, AS TO THE JAN-14-2022 HEARING RE: PLAINTIFFS HOPE WILLIAMS, NATHAN SHEARD, AND NESTOR REYES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, THE COURT ADOPTS ITS TENTATIVE RULING. MATTER IS CONTINUED TO JANUARY 21, 2022 ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION. JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER, JR.; CLERK: SEAN KANE; COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO, CSR NO. 8600, EMAIL: MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM (302/RBU)

Jan. 14, 2022

Jan. 14, 2022

MINI MINUTES FOR JAN-21-2022 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302

Jan. 21, 2022

Jan. 21, 2022

MINI MINUTES FOR JAN-21-2022 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302

Jan. 21, 2022

Jan. 21, 2022

LAW & MOTION, DEPT. 302, JAN-21-2022 HEARING HELD RE: DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THE COURT CONTINUES THIS MATTER FOR FURTHER HEARING TO FEBRUARY 1, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M. IN DEPT. 302, LAW & MOTION. JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER JR.; CLERK: SEAN KANE; COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO, CSR NO. 8600, EMAIL: MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM (302/RBU)

Jan. 21, 2022

Jan. 21, 2022

LAW & MOTION, DEPT. 302, JAN-21-2022 HEARING HELD RE: PLAINTIFFS HOPE WILLIAMS, NATHAN SHEARD, AND NESTOR REYES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THE COURT CONTINUES THIS MATTER FOR FURTHER HEARING TO FEBRUARY 1, 2022 AT 9:30 A.M. IN DEPT. 302, LAW & MOTION. JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER JR.; CLERK: SEAN KANE; COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO, CSR NO. 8600, EMAIL: MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM (302/RBU)

Jan. 21, 2022

Jan. 21, 2022

MINI MINUTES FOR FEB-01-2022 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302

Feb. 1, 2022

Feb. 1, 2022

MINI MINUTES FOR FEB-01-2022 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302

Feb. 1, 2022

Feb. 1, 2022

LAW AND MOTION, 302, DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS TAKEN UNDER SUBMISSION. JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER, CLERK: W. TRUPEK, COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO CSR# 8600, EMAIL: MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM MAILTO:MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM, REPORTED. (302/RBU)

Feb. 1, 2022

Feb. 1, 2022

LAW AND MOTION, 302, PLAINTIFF HOPE WILLIAMS, NATHAN SHEARD, NESTOR REYES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS TAKEN UNDER SUBMISSION. JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER, CLERK: W. TRUPEK, COURT REPORTER: MARIA TORREANO CSR# 8600, EMAIL: MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM MAILTO:MARIA.TORREANO@GMAIL.COM, REPORTED. (302/RBU)

Feb. 1, 2022

Feb. 1, 2022

07981681

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE (TRANSACTION ID # 67304503) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Fee: EXEMPT

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

07981682

DECLARATION OF WAYNE SNODGRASS IN SUPPORT OF JOINT EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE (TRANSACTION ID # 67304503) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

07981683

STIPULATION CONTINUING TRIAL DATE (TRANSACTION ID # 67304503) FILED BY CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

07981685

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC MAIL AND BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE (TRANSACTION ID # 67304503) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

07982009

ORDERS ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

LAW & MOTION, DEPT. 302, PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON FEB-01-2022, THE COURT NOW GRANTS DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (SEE SINGLE SIGNED ORDER AS TO BOTH MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR COMPLETE RULING.) JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER JR. (302/RBU)

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

LAW & MOTION, DEPT. 302, PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON FEB-01-2022, THE COURT NOW DENIES PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (SEE SINGLE SIGNED ORDER AS TO BOTH MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR COMPLETE RULING.) JUDGE: RICHARD B. ULMER JR. (302/RBU)

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

07982872

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER/NOTICE OF RULING FILED (TRANSACTION ID # 67306534) FILED BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Feb. 10, 2022

Feb. 10, 2022

07992166

REMOVED FROM MASTER COURT CALENDAR ON FEB-22-2022. ASSIGNED TO CASE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 610 ON JUN-15-2022 AT 10:30 AM FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR JUDGMENT AFTER ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS FILED 2/9/22. NOTICE SENT BY COURT. (206)

Feb. 17, 2022

Feb. 17, 2022

08019509

THE COURT ORDERED THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT ENTERED: IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR TAKE NOTHING FROM DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT

March 10, 2022

March 10, 2022

08021643

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 67387566)

March 11, 2022

March 11, 2022

08039642

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY APPELLANT WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR Fee: $100.00

March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

08039691

PROOF OF SERVICE FILED BY APPELLANT WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

08039935

NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL (TRANSACTION ID # 67428421) FILED BY APPELLANT WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

REPORTERS COSTS, TRAN # C2322328A003, TAG # 036872 (TRANSACTION ID # 67428421) DEPOSITED BY APPELLANT WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR Fee: $650.00

March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

FEE TO COVER TRIAL COURT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ADMINISTERING TRUST ACCOUNTS FOR PAYMENT OF REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT COSTS IN CIVIL APPEALS (CRC 8.130(B)(1); GC 70632) Fee: $50.00

March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

08074430

CLERK'S NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE OF APPEAL

April 22, 2022

April 22, 2022

08076089

NOTICE OF DEFAULT ON APPEAL SENT TO APPELLANT WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR

April 25, 2022

April 25, 2022

08077831

CLERK'S CERTIFICATE RE: DEFAULT NOTICE

April 26, 2022

April 26, 2022

08098579

NOTICE TO REPORTER TO PREPARE TRANSCRIPT

May 12, 2022

May 12, 2022

08100845

CLERK'S ESTIMATE OF COST OF APPEAL RECORD SENT TO APPELLANT, ESTIMATED COST $935.00 [$1,035., LESS $100.]

May 16, 2022

May 16, 2022

08112740

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE OF JUN-15-2022 IS OFF CALENDAR. JUDGMENT ON FILE. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.

May 24, 2022

May 24, 2022

COSTS OF PREPARATION ON APPEAL DEPOSITED (TRANSACTION ID # 67661502) BY APPELLANT WILLIAMS, HOPE SHEARD, NATHAN REYES, NESTOR Fee: $935.00

May 25, 2022

May 25, 2022

APPEAL RECORD CERTIFIED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL - 3 VOLS CT VIA TAP, 2 VOLS RT [APPEAL FILED 3-25-22, A165040 DIV 4]

June 29, 2022

June 29, 2022

08154214

CERTIFICATION NOTICE

June 29, 2022

June 29, 2022

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Policing

Special Collection(s):

Police Violence Protests

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 7, 2020

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiffs in this case are Black and latinx people who reside in San Francisco and who participated in protests against police violence in May and June of 2020.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU Affiliates (any)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City of San Francisco (San Francisco), City

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General:

Racial profiling