Case: Edwards v. Sard

63-01983 | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed Date: 1963

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This was a civil rights case brought under 42 USC Sec. 1983 in the early 1960s by two African American inmates at Lorton Reformatory, a correctional institution operated by the District of Columbia, charging that they had been discriminated against in housing assignments. The inmates had been assigned to dormitories housing only African American inmates. Their requests for transfer to other housing had been denied. Some dormitories were integrated, while others were segregated. The court addres…

This was a civil rights case brought under 42 USC Sec. 1983 in the early 1960s by two African American inmates at Lorton Reformatory, a correctional institution operated by the District of Columbia, charging that they had been discriminated against in housing assignments. The inmates had been assigned to dormitories housing only African American inmates. Their requests for transfer to other housing had been denied. Some dormitories were integrated, while others were segregated. The court addressed the question of whether racially-based housing assignments in prisons are illegal race discrimination. Noting that the law allowed for delay in total integration for compelling circumstances, the District Court (Judge Luther Wallace Youngdahl) concluded that proof of a racial imbalance in the dormitories was not sufficient to justify relief for the inmates where the court found that full integration would jeopardize the safety of the prison due to racial friction, particularly between black Muslims and white inmates, including white supremacist groups. Edwards v. Sard, 250 F.Supp. 977 (1966). We have no further information about this case. Westlaw had no direct history of the case. A PACER search similarly found no information on the case.

Summary Authors

Denise Lieberman (10/17/2005)

People


Judge(s)

Youngdahl, Luther Wallace (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Cooper, George (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Cashman, James (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Youngdahl, Luther Wallace (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

63-01983

Reported Opinion

Feb. 25, 1966

Feb. 25, 1966

Order/Opinion

250 F.Supp. 250

Docket

Last updated March 31, 2024, 3:03 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: 1963

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Black inmates of correctional institution claiming they had been discriminated against in dormitory assignments

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Lorton Reformatory (Lorton), Regional

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General:

Racial segregation

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Administrative segregation

Discrimination-basis:

Race discrimination

Type of Facility:

Government-run