Case: Hill v. Bogans

1:80-cv-01043 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: Nov. 1, 1983

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case was brought in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado by an individual claiming his fourth amendment rights were violated when he was strip searched after being arrested on an invalid warrant on his way to work. He sued a police officer and the City and County of Denver Colorado.

The District Court (Judge Richard P. Matsch) dismissed the case, holding that the search was not unreasonable. Plaintiff appealed.

On May 30, 1984, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed the lower court, holding there was no justification for the strip search.

Summary Authors

Denise Heberle (3/28/2012)

People


Judge(s)

Chilson, Olin Hatfield (Colorado)

Logan, James Kenneth (Kansas)

McWilliams, Robert Hugh Jr. (Colorado)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Berrett, David M. (Colorado)

Attorney for Defendant

Halaby, Theodore S. (Colorado)

Judge(s)

Chilson, Olin Hatfield (Colorado)

Logan, James Kenneth (Kansas)

McWilliams, Robert Hugh Jr. (Colorado)

Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

81-02503

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

May 30, 1984

May 30, 1984

Order/Opinion

735 F.2d 735

Docket

Last updated March 23, 2024, 3:11 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Colorado

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Strip Search Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 1, 1983

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff was arrested on a bench warrant for failure to appear on a traffic citation. The warrant had been withdrawn, but the officer did not contact the county court. The arrestee was strip searched and placed with the general jail population.

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

The City and County of Denver (Denver, Denver), County

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Unreasonable search and seizure

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

Affected Sex or Gender:

Male

Type of Facility:

Government-run

Policing:

Strip search policy (policing)