Case: People v. Seymour

78-2033 | Illinois state appellate court

Filed Date: 1979

Closed Date: Feb. 3, 1981

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In this criminal case the defendant sought to supress evidence based on an illegal strip search. The trial court (Circuit Court, Cook County, Franklin I. Kral, J.) ordered supression. The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court's decision. People v. Seymour, 398 N.E.2d 1191 (Ill. App. 1979), but on February 3, 1981, the Supreme Court of Illinois reversed the lower courts' decisions, holding that the specific details of any strip search determine its reasonableness. Pepole v. Seymour, 416 N.E. 2d 1070 (Ill. 1981).

The court held that the failure of the officers to inform the defendant that his was a bailable offense, (thus creating a custodial situation, as defendant had funds on his person sufficient to post bond) did not make the subsequent search unreasonable. Further, the court held that the search was reasonable because it was conducted incident to lawful arrest and was not so intrusive as to make it unreasonable.

398 N.E.2d 1191

Summary Authors

Denise Heberle (3/23/2012)

People


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Carey, Bernard (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Adam, Sam (Illinois)

Bloom, Marvin I. (Illinois)

Fahner, Tyrone C. (Illinois)

Hubbard, Arnette (Illinois)

Judge(s)

McGillicuddy, Helen F. (Illinois)

McNamara, Barry Thomas (Illinois)

Ryan, Howard C. (Illinois)

Simon, Seymour (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

78-2033

Opinion

Dec. 31, 1979

Dec. 31, 1979

Order/Opinion

398 N.E.2d 398

No. 53139

Opinion

Illinois state supreme court

Feb. 3, 1981

Feb. 3, 1981

Order/Opinion

416 N.E.2d 416

Docket

Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 2:49 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Strip Search Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: 1979

Closing Date: Feb. 3, 1981

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The people of the State of Illinois. (criminal case)

Plaintiff Type(s):

State Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

William Seymour, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General:

Strip search policy

Affected Sex or Gender:

Male

Type of Facility:

Government-run