University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
Title "Raimondo v. FBI (Internet Free Speech)"
Date Aug 27, 2018
Author ACLU Northern California
External Link
Abstract In 2004, the FBI conducted a “threat assessment” of long-time journalists and commentators Justin Raimondo and Eric Garris, as well as their website, In violation of the federal Privacy Act, this threat assessment compiled descriptions of the journalists’ First Amendment activities without any apparent law enforcement purpose. Attorneys at the ACLU Foundation of Northern California and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP represented the journalists in a federal lawsuit against the FBI. Records the journalists received in response to their Freedom of Information Act claims revealed that the threat assessment was based on shoddy investigative work in addition to the apparent targeting of the journalists’ political speech. In the litigation, the FBI asserted that it was entitled to create this threat assessment because of’s posting of government documents. But the First Amendment has long protected the publication of government secrets and the FBI never even suggested that the journalists or had violated the law by obtaining or posting those documents.
Source ACLU

This Resource Relates To
case Raimondo v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (NS-CA-0020)

new search