University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
Title "Harris v. Quinn"
Date August 1, 2014
Author SCOTUS Blog
External Link
Abstract The holding in a lower court for this case was that the First Amendment prohibits the collection of an agency fee from the plaintiffs in this case, home health care providers who do not wish to join or support a union.

The Supreme Court judgment reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 30, 2014. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Sotomayor joined.
Source SCOTUS Blog

This Resource Relates To
case Harris v. Quinn (FA-IL-0012)

new search