University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
Title "U.S. v. Mohamud"
Date Dec 5, 2016
Author Global Freedom of Expression
External Link
Abstract The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an Oregon District Court ruling that the incidental collection of a U.S. citizen’s activities online under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) did not violate the Appellant’s Fourth Amendment rights protecting a citizen from unreasonable search and seizure. The Appeals Court also held that the District Court properly rejected the Appellant’s entrapment defense.
Source Columbia University

This Resource Relates To
case United States v. Mohamud (NS-OR-0003)

new search