June 27, 2024
On August 22, 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit, United States v. State of Idaho, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho to protect what it alleged were rights of patients to access emergency abortion care guaranteed by federal law. The suit challenged Idaho Code § 18-622, passed in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs, which was set to go into effect on Aug. 25, 2022 and would impose a near-total ban on abortion in the state. The complaint sought a declaratory judgment that § 18-622 conflicted with, and was preempted by, the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, in situations where an abortion is necessary stabilizing treatment for an emergency medical condition, and an order permanently enjoining the Idaho law to the extent it conflicted with EMTALA.
On August 24, 2022, the district court granted the DOJ’s motion for a preliminary injunction, reasoning that it was not possible for healthcare workers to simultaneously comply with their obligations under EMTALA and Idaho Code § 18-622. On September 28, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stayed the injunction pending consideration of the appeal of district court's preliminary injunction order. Two days later, the Ninth Circuit, upon en banc reconsideration, lifted the stay. On January 5, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the preliminary injunction. Moreover, treating the application for a stay as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment, it granted the petition. The Court heard arguments in April 2024. On June 27, 2024, however, the Court issued a per curiam opinion, dismissing the case as improvidently granted and vacating the January 5 stay. Thus, the preliminary injunction went into effect, and hospitals were able to perform emergency abortions in the state while the litigation continued in the lower courts.
Read more about the case and find relevant documents here.