Case: DeWolfe v. Richmond

24C06009911 | Maryland state trial court

Filed Date: Nov. 13, 2006

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

A case summary is not yet available via the Clearinghouse.

People

Judge(s)

Adkins, Sally Denison (Maryland)

Barbera, Thomas Jeffrey (Louisiana)

Battaglia, Lynne A. (Maryland)

Bell, Robert M. (Maryland)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

Bashur, Ashley (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Adkins, Sally Denison (Maryland)

Barbera, Thomas Jeffrey (Louisiana)

Battaglia, Lynne A. (Maryland)

Bell, Robert M. (Maryland)

Berger, Stuart R. (Maryland)

Eldridge, John C. (Maryland)

Harrell, Glenn T. (Maryland)

Nance, Alfred (Maryland)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Mirviss, Mitchell Y (Maryland)

Schatzow, Michael (Maryland)

Attorney for Defendant

Bashur, Ashley (District of Columbia)

Brockman, William F. (Maryland)

Curtis, Scott (Maryland)

Hut, A. Stephen Jr. (District of Columbia)

Peltzman, Cynthia G. (Maryland)

Wilson-Shelton, Gloria (Maryland)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
06-09911	Docket Richmond v. District Court of Maryland	July 3, 2014	July 3, 2014 Docket
06-09911	Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland	June 12, 2007	June 12, 2007 Order/Opinion 2007 WL 5446237
06-09911	Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland	Oct. 24, 2007	Oct. 24, 2007 Order/Opinion 2007 WL 7584827
06-09911	Amended Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland	Dec. 7, 2007	Dec. 7, 2007 Order/Opinion 2007 WL 5446238
06-09911	[Untitled] Richmond v. District Court Maryland state appellate court	July 23, 2008	July 23, 2008 Order/Opinion 952 A.2d 224
06-09911	Per Curiam Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland Maryland state appellate court	March 5, 2010	March 5, 2010 Order/Opinion 990 A.2d 549
06-09911	Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland	Sept. 30, 2010	Sept. 30, 2010 Order/Opinion 2010 WL 7361161
06-09911	[Untitled] Dewolfe v. Richmond Maryland state appellate court	June 17, 2011	June 17, 2011 Order/Opinion 21 A.3d 1063
06-09911	Opinion by Barbera, J. Harrell and Adkins, JJ., concur and dissent Dewolfe v. Richmond Maryland state appellate court	Jan. 4, 2012	Jan. 4, 2012 Order/Opinion 76 A.3d 962
06-09911	Opinion by Eldridge, J., Barbera, C.J., Harrell and Adkins, JJ., dissent. Dewolfe v. Richmond Maryland state appellate court	Sept. 25, 2013	Sept. 25, 2013 Order/Opinion 76 A.3d 1019

show / hide documents

Resources

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Securing Reasonable Caseloads: Ethics and Law in Public Defense Norman Lefstein	Chapter 1: The Failure to Implement the Right to Counsel Due to Excessive Caseloads A. The Constitutional Right to Counsel: Brief Overview B. Excessive Workloads: A Pervasive National P…	2011	Jan. 1, 2011 http://www.americanbar.org/...
Justice Denied: America's Continuing Neglect of Our Constitutional Right to Counsel. National Right to Counsel Committee	[Edited, from the website:] [Notwithstanding the nominal right of indigent defendants to publicly provided counsel,] Today, in criminal and juvenile proceedings in state courts, somet…	April 14, 2009	April 14, 2009 http://www.constitutionproject.org/...

show / hide resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 3:10 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory:

Case Type(s):

Indigent Defense

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 13, 2006

Case Details

Other Dockets:

Maryland state appellate court No. 34

Maryland state trial court 24C06009911