Case: District of Columbia Council of the Blind v. District of Columbia

1:25-01694 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: May 29, 2025

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

[This summary is temporary while we research the case]. On May 29, 2025, the DC Council of the Blind (DCCB) and five named plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against the District of Columbia, alleging that blind pedestrians in the District could safely cross the vast majority of signalized intersections due to a lack of Accessible Pedestrian Signals (“APS”). The plaintiffs alleged that while the District has visual pedestrian signals many intersections to ensure the safety of its sighted pedestrians…

[This summary is temporary while we research the case]. On May 29, 2025, the DC Council of the Blind (DCCB) and five named plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against the District of Columbia, alleging that blind pedestrians in the District could safely cross the vast majority of signalized intersections due to a lack of Accessible Pedestrian Signals (“APS”). The plaintiffs alleged that while the District has visual pedestrian signals many intersections to ensure the safety of its sighted pedestrians, only a fraction of those intersections have devices with APS to make them accessible to blind pedestrians. Moreover, the signals equipped with APS are often plagued by installation and maintenance issues. The plaintiffs alleged that the District's systemic failure to provide blind pedestrians full and equal access to its pedestrian signals program in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq.; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794; and the D.C. Human Rights Act, D.C. Code § 2-1401.01 et seq.

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70400677/parties/district-of-columbia-council-of-the-blind-v-district-of-columbia/


Judge(s)

Chutkan, Tanya Sue (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Allen, Michael Gerhart (District of Columbia)

Banner, Kaitlin Rose (District of Columbia)

Gallagher, Erin (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Duprey, Patrick J. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

No documents yet available via the Clearinghouse.

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70400677/district-of-columbia-council-of-the-blind-v-district-of-columbia/

Last updated Jan. 25, 2026, 11:50 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link

NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR The following error(s) need correction: Missing summonses- D.C. government. When naming a D.C. government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the D.C. Attorney General & D.C. Mayor. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. Invalid signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata. All filings must have an original signature or /s/ Attorney Name to represent an electronic signature of the filer. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zmtm)

May 29, 2025

May 29, 2025

Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zmtm)

May 30, 2025

May 30, 2025

RESOLVED.....NOTICE of Provisional/Government Not Certified Status re 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer I. Klar on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Klar, Jennifer).Your attorney renewal/government certification has not been received. As a result, your membership with the U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia is not in good standing, and you are not permitted to file. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.9, you must immediately correct your membership status by following the appropriate instructions on this page of our website: https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal. Please be advised that the presiding judge in this case has been notified that you are currently not in good standing to file in this court. Renewal Due by 6/11/2025. (zhcn) Modified on 6/6/2025 (zapb).

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

MINUTE ORDER: GRANTING Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to 5 Rachel Weisberg and 6 Erin Gallagher. Rachel Weisberg and Erin Gallagher are hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Plaintiffs in this matter. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 6/5/2025. (lcer)

June 5, 2025

June 5, 2025

MINUTE ORDER: GRANTING Defendant's 19 Consent Motion to Extend Time. Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' 1 Complaint is due by August 4, 2025. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 6/17/2025. (lcer)

June 17, 2025

June 17, 2025

MINUTE ORDER: GRANTING 20 Consent Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff shall file any motion for class certification by October 14, 2025. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 6/23/2025. (lcer)

June 23, 2025

June 23, 2025

MINUTE ORDER: GRANTING Defendant's 22 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is due by August 25, 2025. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 8/4/2025. (lcer)

Aug. 4, 2025

Aug. 4, 2025

MINUTE ORDER: GRANTING the parties' 23 Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines. Plaintiffs' deadline to move for class certification and Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint are hereby STAYED. The parties shall submit a joint status report by October 10, 2025, either requesting a referral to mediation or proposing a schedule for this case going forward. The joint status report shall be accompanied by a proposed order. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 9/26/2025. (lcer)

Sept. 26, 2025

Sept. 26, 2025

MINUTE ORDER: The parties' 25 Joint Motion to Stay and Refer to Mediation is GRANTED. This matter is hereby referred to the Court's Mediation Program. The Clerk of Court shall furnish a copy of this Minute Order to the Mediation Program for the purpose of designating a mediator. Further proceedings in this matter are STAYED until further order of the court. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before February 20, 2026, updating the court on the status of mediation and advising it as to the parties' position on whether the stay should be extended. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 11/20/2025. (lchs)

Nov. 20, 2025

Nov. 20, 2025

CASE REFERRED to Mediation. (zcll)

Nov. 20, 2025

Nov. 20, 2025

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 29, 2025

Case Details

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:25-01694