Filed Date: May 29, 2025
Clearinghouse coding in progress
[This summary is temporary while we research the case]. On May 29, 2025, the DC Council of the Blind (DCCB) and five named plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against the District of Columbia, alleging that blind pedestrians in the District could safely cross the vast majority of signalized intersections due to a lack of Accessible Pedestrian Signals (“APS”). The plaintiffs alleged that while the District has visual pedestrian signals many intersections to ensure the safety of its sighted pedestrians, only a fraction of those intersections have devices with APS to make them accessible to blind pedestrians. Moreover, the signals equipped with APS are often plagued by installation and maintenance issues. The plaintiffs alleged that the District's systemic failure to provide blind pedestrians full and equal access to its pedestrian signals program in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq.; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794; and the D.C. Human Rights Act, D.C. Code § 2-1401.01 et seq.
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70400677/parties/district-of-columbia-council-of-the-blind-v-district-of-columbia/
Chutkan, Tanya Sue (District of Columbia)
Allen, Michael Gerhart (District of Columbia)
Banner, Kaitlin Rose (District of Columbia)
Gallagher, Erin (District of Columbia)
Duprey, Patrick J. (District of Columbia)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70400677/district-of-columbia-council-of-the-blind-v-district-of-columbia/
Last updated Jan. 25, 2026, 11:50 a.m.