Plaintiff Higginson's legal argument supporting an injunction (injunction denied). Plaintiff argued that race predominated over other factors, claiming that race was the only factor in the city's decision to change its voting system. The plaintiff also notes that any abridgement of the right to vote is irreparable harm and that the California Voting Rights Act provision that allows a private law firm threaten to sue a city to compel a change in voting system creates an imbalance of inequities to deserve an injunction. | Higginson v. Becerra S.D. Cal.