On February 2, 2017, 50 ACLU affiliates submitted FOIA requests seeking information about Customs and Border Protection’s on-the-ground implementation of the Muslim Bans at field offices around the country. When the government failed to respond in the time allotted, certain ACLU affiliates filed suit in April to get the requested records.
Since then, the government has released three “partial” responses that paint an incomplete picture of how CBP headquarters reacted. Because the FOIA requests now in litigation focus on how the bans were implemented locally, very few, if any, of the records produced thus far are responsive to the affiliates’ requests or relevant to the pending lawsuits.
But, because you have a right to know — and question — what the government is up to, we are publishing the documents the government released here and highlighting some themes that emerge from them.
Resource Type(s):
Clearinghouse Links to External Resources
Institution: American Civil Liberties Union
Related Cases:
American Civil Liberties Union of Hawai'i v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
American Civil Liberties Union of Maine v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
ACLU of Michigan v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
ACLU of Georgia v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
ACLU of Oregon v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
ACLU of Washington v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
ACLU Foundation of Texas v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
ACLU of Arizona v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
American Civil Liberties Union of Florida v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
ACLU of Southern California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security