This Note argues that reform must come from re-envisioning the manner in which the parole process is administered and by applying a truly individualized approach. To be clear, the legal standard of current dangerousness is not at issue; it is the process by which the parole board determines a given inmate's current danger that needs reform. Although many have evaluated the intersection between the DD population and the criminal justice system-including, for example, the often-unfair treatment and lack of opportunities at parole hearings for DD inmates7-few have studied inmates that fall into a "grey area." That is, individuals who do not fall within the DD classification, but who cannot successfully meet the requirements of parole without a more personalized assessment.
https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/2018/07/02/an-impossible-standard-the-california-parole-board-process-for-inmates-with-cognitive-impairments-note-by-amber-heron/Resource Type(s):
Articles that use the Clearinghouse
Institution: University of Southern California Gould School of Law
Citation: 91 S. Cal. L. Rev. 990-1019
Related Cases: