Resource: Merrill v. Dunlap

By: Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project

September 5, 2020

Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project

Plaintiffs, who are blind or legally blind, claimed ADA, 29 U.S.C. 794 et seq., and Maine Human Rights Act violations relating to Maine's refusal to provide accessible electronic voting/vote-by-mail means. Plaintiffs demanded that Maine implement a remote, accessible vote by mail system.

https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=158