Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Support the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse?

The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse is committed to making information about civil rights lawsuits public, accessible, and free. If you use our--recently revamped--website and the posted documents and information, would you consider a donation? Our small but mighty team relies principally on grant funding and donations. Can you help?

Thank you!

DONATE

Resource: Innovation or Illegitimacy: Remedial Receivership in Tinsley v. Kemp Public Housing Litigation

By: Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke

January 1, 2000

Through an analysis of Tinsley v. Kemp, a decade-long institutional reform case aimed at changing Kansas City, Missouri public housing, this Article engages in a case study focused on the receivership remedy in practice. Part I chronicles the decade of litigation and remedial results that turned around the troubled Kansas City Housing Authority ("Housing Authority"). Part II examines the efficacy and legitimacy of court displacement of government actors in the context of institutional reform litigation and compares receivership to other remedial alternatives. Part IMI concludes that while receivership has unique attributes, it is not a wholly extraordinary remedial measure. It was, however, a resourceful response to the organizational incompetence and dysfunction at the Housing Authority.

http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3613&context=mlr

Resource Type(s):

Case Studies

Institution: Harvard

Citation: 65 Missouri L. Rev. 655

Related Cases:

Tinsley v. Pierce