Case: Edge v. DeKalb County

4:91-cv-00308 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Filed Date: Feb. 8, 1991

Closed Date: 1997

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On February 8, 1991, inmates in the DeKalb County Jail in Alabama filed a class action lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama against the county and corrections officials alleging unconstitutional conditions of confinement. The defendants filed a third-party complaint against the Alabama Department of Corrections alleging that they were responsible for the alleged unconstitutional conditions because the jail's inmates were mostly state pri…

On February 8, 1991, inmates in the DeKalb County Jail in Alabama filed a class action lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama against the county and corrections officials alleging unconstitutional conditions of confinement. The defendants filed a third-party complaint against the Alabama Department of Corrections alleging that they were responsible for the alleged unconstitutional conditions because the jail's inmates were mostly state prisoners. On June 14, 1991, the court (Judge William Acker Jr.) certified the class. On June 30, 1992, the court (Judge Acker) entered a consent decree, agreed to by the inmates and the county defendants -- but not the Alabama Department of Corrections, limiting the jail's population to 38 inmates, and requiring the jail to enhance security and the physical building. The court chose deliberately not to rule upon the third-party claims.

On February 3, 1993, the inmates filed a notice of noncompliance with the consent decree. On June 16, 1993, the court (Judge Acker) approved a settlement for the noncompliance matters.

On July 2, 1997, the Alabama Department of Corrections filed a motion to terminate the consent decree and perspective relief pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). On October 7, 1997, the court (Judge Acker) granted the motion to terminate because no findings had been made that the relief was narrowly drawn or that it was the least intrusive means to correct the violations and the plaintiffs did not make a showing that continued relief was necessary to correct a current violation of a federal right. The court also found that the PLRA was not unconstitutional. The plaintiffs appealed but the appeal was dismissed on February 12, 1998, for failing to pay the filing fee.

Summary Authors

Jaclyn Adams (4/5/2006)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5172105/parties/edge-v-dekalb-county/


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

4:91-cv-00308

Docket (PACER)

Edge v. DeKalb County

Feb. 12, 1998

Feb. 12, 1998

Docket
105

4:91-cv-00308

Memorandum Opinion (Class Action)

Oct. 7, 1997

Oct. 7, 1997

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5172105/edge-v-dekalb-county/

Last updated Aug. 16, 2025, 6:50 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
105

MEMORANDUM opinion filed ( by Judge William M. Acker Jr ) cm (Former Employee)

Oct. 7, 1997

Oct. 7, 1997

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: Alabama

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 8, 1991

Closing Date: 1997

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

inmates in the DeKalb County Jail in Alabama

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Southern Center for Human Rights (SCHR)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

DeKalb County (De Kalb), County

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 1992 - 1997

Issues

General/Misc.:

Totality of conditions

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Crowding (General)

Crowding: Pre-PLRA Population Cap