Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:
6930 cases, 47238 documents
Ordered by
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Burns v. Cline

CV-2015-2050 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Nov. 3, 2015

Case Ongoing

On November 3, 2015, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a lawsuit on behalf of an Oklahoma physician who had been practicing safe abortion care, against the Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and the District Attorney for Cleveland, Garvin and McClain counties. The lawsuit challenged S.B. 642, which imposed four different sets of requirements or restrictions on abortion providers in Oklahoma, including: A prohibition on aiding, abetting, or assisting a minor in obtaining an abortion without…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Davis v. Edmondson

CJ-2009-9154 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2009

Case Ongoing

On September 29, 2009, the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), on behalf of two Oklahoma resident taxpayers, filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Oklahoma County (Oklahoma state trial court). The lawsuit challenged Oklahoma House Bill 1595 on the grounds that the law violated the Oklahoma State Constitution’s “single-subject” requirement and that its enforcement would unlawfully use taxpayer funds. H.B. 1595 included a ban on “sex-selective abortions” and established new reporting require…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Nova Health Systems v. Henry

CJ-2008-9119 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Oct. 9, 2008

Case Ongoing

On October 9, 2008, NOVA Health Systems, a reproductive health clinic that offered abortions, challenged Oklahoma Senate Bill 1878 in the District Court of Oklahoma County. The law would impose numerous restrictions on the performance of an abortion, including a requirement that, before a woman may obtain an abortion, she must listen to her doctor describe an ultrasound image of her pregnancy. It also imposed limits on the administration of medication abortion and included informed consent requ…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
South Wind Women's Center v. Hunter

CV-2019-2506 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Nov. 8, 2019

Closed Date: Feb. 23, 2021

On November 8, 2019, South Wind Women's Center and Trust Women Oklahoma City (two reproductive healthcare facilities), the medical director of the Trust Women clinics, and a nurse practitioner of Trust Women filed this lawsuit. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, the plaintiffs challenged two Oklahoma statutes, 63 O.S. § 1-729.1 (“Physician-In Person Law”) and 63 O.S. § 1-731(A) (”Physician-Only Law”). The Physician-In Person Law prohibited the administration of medication aborti…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice v. Cline

CV-2011-1722 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Oct. 5, 2011

Case Ongoing

On October 5, 2011, the Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice (a non-profit dedicated to promoting reproductive justice) and NOVA Health Systems (a clinic providing reproductive healthcare services), represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) filed this lawsuit. Plaintiffs named as defendants the Oklahoma Commissioners of Health, the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, and the Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners. The lawsuit challenged Oklahom…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Tulsa Women's Reproductive Clinic v. Hunter

cv-2019-2176 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Sept. 25, 2019

Case Ongoing

On September 25, 2019, Tulsa Women’s Reproductive Clinic, represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, filed this lawsuit in an Oklahoma trial court challenging an Oklahoma law that forced doctors to tell patients that medication abortion can be “reversed” within 72 hours before their medication abortion appointment, a claim that is unsupported by scientific evidence. This law, S.B. 614, also required abortion providers to put up signs and inform patients of a website and 24-hour hotline …
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Nova Health Systems v. Cline

cv-2015-1838 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Oct. 2, 2015

Case Ongoing

On October 2, 2015, NOVA Health Systems (NOVA, a reproductive services health care clinic that provides abortions), represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Oklahoma County (Oklahoma state trial court). The lawsuit challenged recently enacted state laws H.B. 1721 and H.B. 1409, which banned the most common method of second-trimester abortion, “dilation and evacuation,” and increased the state’s mandatory waiting period from 24 to 72 hours, resp…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Nova Health Systems v. Edmondson

cv-2010-533 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: April 27, 2010

Case Ongoing

On April 27, 2010, NOVA Health Systems (a reproductive healthcare clinic), a physician providing abortion care in Oklahoma, and the Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice filed a challenge against Oklahoma House Bill 2780. The law prohibited a woman from getting an abortion unless she was first given an ultrasound, shown the ultrasound image, and listened to her doctor describe the image in detail. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on th…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Whole Woman's Health v. Smith

1:16-cv-01300 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: Dec. 12, 2016

Closed Date: Aug. 23, 2022

Whole Woman's Health and several other reproductive healthcare providers filed this lawsuit against the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas on December 12, 2016. Plaintiffs were represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights as well as private counsel. The suit challenged proposed regulations published by the Texas Department of State Health Services. These proposed regulations would require embryonic and fetal tissue …
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. State of South Carolina

2022-001062 | South Carolina state supreme court

Filed Date: July 13, 2022

Case Ongoing

On July 13, 2022, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, Greenville Women’s Clinic, and two physicians filed a lawsuit against South Carolina to challenge the state’s Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), a six-week abortion ban. This case was first filed in the Court of Common Pleas for the Fifth Judicial Circuit, then later taken up by the South Carolina Supreme Court after a petition for original jurisdiction was filed on July 20, 2022. Plaintiffs argued that South Carolina's six-week abortion ban violates the …