Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case: DeWolfe v. Richmond

24-CM06-009911 | Maryland state trial court

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

None

People

Judge(s)

Adkins, Sally Denison (Maryland)

Barbera, Thomas Jeffrey (Louisiana)

Battaglia, Lynne A. (Maryland)

Bell, Robert M. (Maryland)

Berger, Stuart R. (Maryland)

Eldridge, John C. (Maryland)

Harrell, Glenn T. (Maryland)

Nance, Alfred (Maryland)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Mirviss, Mitchell Y (Maryland)

Schatzow, Michael (Maryland)

Judge(s)

Adkins, Sally Denison (Maryland)

Barbera, Thomas Jeffrey (Louisiana)

Battaglia, Lynne A. (Maryland)

Bell, Robert M. (Maryland)

Berger, Stuart R. (Maryland)

Eldridge, John C. (Maryland)

Harrell, Glenn T. (Maryland)

Nance, Alfred (Maryland)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Mirviss, Mitchell Y (Maryland)

Schatzow, Michael (Maryland)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Bashur, Ashley (District of Columbia)

Brockman, William F. (Maryland)

Curtis, Scott (Maryland)

Hut, A. Stephen Jr. (District of Columbia)

Peltzman, Cynthia G. (Maryland)

Wilson-Shelton, Gloria (Maryland)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
24C06009911	Docket Richmond v. District Court of Maryland	July 3, 2014	July 3, 2014 Docket
24-C-06-00911CN	Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland 2007 WL 5446237	June 12, 2007	June 12, 2007 Order/Opinion
24C06009911	Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland 2007 WL 7584827	Oct. 24, 2007	Oct. 24, 2007 Order/Opinion
24C06009911	Amended Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland 2007 WL 5446238	Dec. 7, 2007	Dec. 7, 2007 Order/Opinion
24C06009911	[Untitled] Richmond v. District Court Maryland state appellate court 952 A.2d 224	July 23, 2008	July 23, 2008 Order/Opinion
24C06009911	Per Curiam Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland Maryland state appellate court 990 A.2d 549	March 5, 2010	March 5, 2010 Order/Opinion
24C06009911	Order Richmond v. District Court of Maryland 2010 WL 7361161	Sept. 30, 2010	Sept. 30, 2010 Order/Opinion
24C06009911	[Untitled] Dewolfe v. Richmond Maryland state appellate court 21 A.3d 1063	June 17, 2011	June 17, 2011 Order/Opinion
24C06009911	Opinion by Barbera, J. Harrell and Adkins, JJ., concur and dissent Dewolfe v. Richmond Maryland state appellate court 76 A.3d 962	Jan. 4, 2012	Jan. 4, 2012 Order/Opinion
24C06009911	Opinion by Eldridge, J., Barbera, C.J., Harrell and Adkins, JJ., dissent. Dewolfe v. Richmond Maryland state appellate court 76 A.3d 1019	Sept. 25, 2013	Sept. 25, 2013 Order/Opinion

show / hide documents

Resources

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Securing Reasonable Caseloads: Ethics and Law in Public Defense Norman Lefstein	Chapter 1: The Failure to Implement the Right to Counsel Due to Excessive Caseloads A. The Constitutional Right to Counsel: Brief Overview B. Excessive Workloads: A Pervasive National P…	Jan. 1, 2011	Jan. 1, 2011 http://www.americanbar.org/...
Justice Denied: America's Continuing Neglect of Our Constitutional Right to Counsel. National Right to Counsel Committee	[Edited, from the website:] [Notwithstanding the nominal right of indigent defendants to publicly provided counsel,] Today, in criminal and juvenile proceedings in state courts, somet…	April 14, 2009	April 14, 2009 http://www.constitutionproject.org/...

show / hide resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 1, 2022, 3:03 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Maryland

Case Type(s):

Indigent Defense