Case: Petition of Kaufman

86E-0018-G1 | Massachusetts state trial court

Filed Date: Jan. 1, 1986

Closed Date: Dec. 15, 1992

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Behavioral Research Institute (BRI), now know as the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, is a Massachusetts based residential care facility for children and young adults with severe autism associated with behavioral problems. BRI is known for its use of negative reinforcement also known as aversive treatments, such as electric shock therapies, to disincentives undesirable behavior. As a result of its use of aversive treatments, BRI has been controversial and the subject of several law suits…

The Behavioral Research Institute (BRI), now know as the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, is a Massachusetts based residential care facility for children and young adults with severe autism associated with behavioral problems. BRI is known for its use of negative reinforcement also known as aversive treatments, such as electric shock therapies, to disincentives undesirable behavior. As a result of its use of aversive treatments, BRI has been controversial and the subject of several law suits. This case, along with Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Retardation, Behavioral Research Institute v. Secretary of Administration, and Judge Rotenburg Center v. Food and Drug Administration, are some of the cases brought surrounding various issues related to BRI.

Two wards with disabilities housed at BRI filed a lawsuit in the Probate and Family Court of Bristol County, Massachusetts petitioning the Court for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioners claimed that they were being unjustly deprived of their liberty without due process of law in violation of state statutes. The petitioners requested that they be placed somewhere other than BRI. The Probate and Family Court denied the petition for habeas corpus and the petitioners appealed.

On December 15, 1992, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts upheld the decision of the Probate and Family court to deny the petitions for habeas corpus. The Court held that the petitions failed because habeas corpus is not a means of requesting alternative placements but rather is to contest unjust restraint on liberty. Since the petitioners were merely requesting an alternative placement and were not contesting their general restraint on liberty or any underlying decisions, the petitions were denied. Petition of Kaufman 413 Mass 1010 (1992).

 

Summary Authors

Brian Kempfer (9/25/2014)

Haleigh Knowles (4/13/2026)

Related Cases

Judge Rotenburg Center v. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (2020)

Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Retardation, Massachusetts state trial court (1986)

Behavioral Research Institute v. Secretary of Administration, Massachusetts state trial court (1989)

People


Judge(s)

Abrams, Ruth (Massachusetts)

Greaney, John M. (Massachusetts)

Liacos, Paul J (Massachusetts)

Lynch, Neil L. (Massachusetts)

Nolan, Joseph R. (Massachusetts)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

86-00018

Opinion [Affirming Judgment]

Massachusetts state supreme court

Dec. 15, 1992

Dec. 15, 1992

Order/Opinion

413 Mass. 1010

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 1:55 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory:

Massachusetts

Case Type(s):

Intellectual Disability (Facility)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1986

Closing Date: Dec. 15, 1992

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Two students with severe autism and mental impairments who are residents at a residential school

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Judge Rotenberg Educational Center

Facility Type(s):

Non-government for-profit

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Other Dockets:

Massachusetts state supreme court 86E-0018-G1

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Sought:

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Unknown

Form of Settlement:

Confession of Judgment

Issues

General/Misc.:

Education

Juveniles

Disability and Disability Rights:

Autism

Disability, unspecified

Intellectual/developmental disability, unspecified

Mental Illness, Unspecified

Mental impairment

Special education

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Assault/abuse by staff (facilities)

Deinstitutionalization/decarceration

Placement in mental health facilities

Restraints (physical)

Youth / Adult separation

Recommended Citation