Filed Date: 2020
Case Ongoing
Clearinghouse coding in progress
NOTE: This case is being tracked in close to real time by the Stanford/MIT Healthy Elections Project. So for information, see their tracker.
According to their summary as of October 7, 2020,
New Hampshire has traditionally been an in-person registration and voting state, with 90% of the electorate voting in person in the 2016 and 2018 elections. Plaintiffs contend that the absentee registration request process is unduly cumbersome and would lead to disenfranchisement of New Hampshire citizens who are navigating the absentee registration and voting process for the first time. In particular, Plaintiffs challenge New Hampshire’s witness requirement, documentation requirement, and Election Day receipt deadline. Additionally, Plaintiffs also challenge the postage requirement, citing excessive burden and costs. Plaintiffs request that court find these rules and requirements to be in violation of the New Hampshire Constitution and to enjoin the state from enforcing these requirements.
Delker, N. William (New Hampshire)
Callais, Amanda R. (District of Columbia)
Conley, William Martin (Wisconsin)
Dutton, Steven J (New Hampshire)
Elias, Marc Erik (District of Columbia)
Last updated Dec. 16, 2024, 8:52 p.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: New Hampshire
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Healthy Elections COVID litigation tracker
Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project
Key Dates
Filing Date: 2020
Case Ongoing: Yes
Plaintiffs
Attorney Organizations: