Case: Stengel v. Hogan

1:18-cv-03423 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Nov. 5, 2018

Closed Date: Nov. 16, 2018

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The case involves an emergency motion to halt the 2018 Maryland general election on the basis of fraud.  The plaintiff, pleading pro se, filed the emergency motion on November 5, 2018, in which they alleged they were falsely incarcerated and accused various government officials of illegal activities. Plaintiff filed this motion in the District of Maryland.  The motion proceeded for 8 pages and ends with a 5-page list of various celebrities who the plaintiff hoped to call as witnesses. Throughou…

The case involves an emergency motion to halt the 2018 Maryland general election on the basis of fraud. 

The plaintiff, pleading pro se, filed the emergency motion on November 5, 2018, in which they alleged they were falsely incarcerated and accused various government officials of illegal activities. Plaintiff filed this motion in the District of Maryland.  The motion proceeded for 8 pages and ends with a 5-page list of various celebrities who the plaintiff hoped to call as witnesses. Throughout the motion, the plaintiff did not cite any statutes or other legal provisions. Plaintiff sought to halt the Maryland general election due to the various alleged illegal activities conducted by government officials. 

The motion was denied and dismissed on November 16, 2018.  The court dismissed on the basis that "there [was] nothing contained in the plaintiff's pleading that might lead any reasonable person to believe that a viable cause of action has accrued on his behalf."   

The case is now closed. 

Summary Authors

(4/23/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8140266/parties/stengel-v-hogan/


Judge(s)

Blake, Catherine C. (Maryland)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Stengel, Marc L. (Maryland)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:18-cv-03423

Motion to Halt Election

Nov. 5, 2018

Nov. 5, 2018

Pleading / Motion / Brief
4

1:18-cv-03423

Memorandum

Nov. 16, 2018

Nov. 16, 2018

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8140266/stengel-v-hogan/

Last updated Aug. 9, 2025, 9:18 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

EMERGENCY MOTION to Halt Election by Marc L. Stengel (Attachments: # 1 Witness List, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (CDs and unusually large documents filed separately) (jnls, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 11/5/2018 (jnls, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 11/05/2018)

Nov. 5, 2018

Nov. 5, 2018

Clearinghouse
2

MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marc L. Stengel (jnls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 11/05/2018)

Nov. 5, 2018

Nov. 5, 2018

PACER
3

NOTICE of Proposed Summons by Marc L. Stengel (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Stet Agreement, # 2 Witness List) (No Contact Request List and CD FILED SEPARATELY) jnls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 11/06/2018)

Nov. 6, 2018

Nov. 6, 2018

PACER
4

MEMORANDUM Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/16/2018. (c/m 11/16/18 cags, Deputy Clerk)

Nov. 16, 2018

Nov. 16, 2018

RECAP
5

ORDER denying 1 Emergency Motion to Halt Election; granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing complaint. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/16/2018. (c/m 11/16/18 cags, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 11/16/2018)

Nov. 16, 2018

Nov. 16, 2018

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Maryland

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 5, 2018

Closing Date: Nov. 16, 2018

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff is a pro se litigant who filed a motion to halt election due to fraud

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Governor Hogan, None

Case Details

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

Declaratory Judgment

Source of Relief:

Unknown

Issues

Voting:

Candidate qualifications

Challenges to at-large/multimember district/election

Voting: General & Misc.