Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
2,862 cases
Ordered by
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Denver Public Schools v. Noem

1:25-cv-00474 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: Feb. 12, 2025

Closed Date: June 9, 2025

This case challenges the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's purported rescission of the long-standing "Protected Areas Policy," which for the last 30 years has restricted immigration enforcement actions in sensitive areas such as schools. Denver Public Schools ("DPS") filed this lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") on Feb. 12, 2025 in the United States District Court of the District of Colorado. The case was assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico. According to the compl…

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)

IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
United States v. City of New York

1:25-cv-04084 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: July 24, 2025

This case involves one of many federal government challenges to sanctuary city laws.   On July 24, 2025, the United States filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the City of New York and its Mayor, as well as other top local agencies and their leadership. Filing under the Supremacy Clause, the Trump Administration claimed that New York’s sanctuary laws obstructed federal efforts to detain individuals unlawfully present in the country. Further,…

Case Is Ongoing

PUBLIC BENEFITS/GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Jansen v. Trump

1:25-cv-02961 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Sept. 2, 2025

This lawsuit challenges the Executive Order titled "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government." Just hours after his inauguration on January 20, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14168, titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” Section 2 of the Order redefined “sex” narrowly as immutable biological characteristics fixed at conception, thereby denying l…

Preliminary Injunction Denied

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Paine v. IKEA Holding US, Inc.

2:19-cv-00723 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: Feb. 21, 2019

Closed Date: Aug. 6, 2025

This case concerns allegations of age discrimination against employees of IKEA. On February 21, 2019, the Plaintiff, a 48 year old long term employee of IKEA, filed this lawsuit in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of himself and “all those current and former employees of IKEA in the United States who, since January 24, 2018, were age 40 or over and denied promotion.” The Plaintiff sued IKEA under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA),  29 U.S.C §621. Specifically, Plaint…

Settled: Case Closed

PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
American Federation of Government Employees v. U.S. Office of Management and Budget

3:25-cv-08302 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2025

This is a lawsuit by several labor organizations challenging the Trump administration’s directives to issue reductions in force during the federal government shutdown.   Plaintiffs include the American Federal of Government Employees (AFGE), the largest union of federal employees, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the largest trade union of public employees in the United States, and two California-based labor organizations. They filed this lawsuit on Se…

Case Is Ongoing

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Bois v. Levi Strauss & Co.

3:23-cv-02772 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: June 5, 2023

Closed Date: Aug. 7, 2025

This is a case challenging the continued passing over of the plaintiff for promotion due to allegedly discriminatory reasons. On June 5, 2023, a former employee of Levi Strauss & Co. filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Plaintiff sued Levi Strauss & Co. sex discrimination under Title VII. She sued Levi Strauss & Co. under age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). She sued Levi Strauss & Co. and her t…

Judgment for Defendant

PUBLIC BENEFITS/GOVERNMENT SERVICES
California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

2:23-cv-10169 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Dec. 4, 2023

This case challenged Los Angeles County’s concealed carry weapon permit issuance policies. On December 4, 2023, individual plaintiffs and four national and state level gun rights advocacy organizations filed a suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1988 against officials representing the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, City of La Verne Police Department, and California Attorney General in the Central District of California. The case was assigned to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Repres…

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Dec. 4, 2023

Defendants City of La Verne's and Chief Flores' Notice of Joinder in Defendants Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff Robert Luna's Response to Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority

May 20, 2024

Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part, Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Aug. 20, 2024

Order Entering Preliminary Injunction

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Jan. 22, 2025

Order Denying In Part And Granting In Part Defendants Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department And Sheriff Robert Luna’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended And Supplemental Complaint [Ecf No. 60]

California Rifle and Pistol Association, Incorporated et al. v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al.

July 21, 2025

see 6 additional documents

Preliminary Injunction Granted

EDUCATION
Council for Opportunity in Education v. U.S. Department of Education

1:25-cv-03514 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2025

This case challenged the Trump Administration Department of Education's decision to discontinue grants provided under the Higher Education Act of 1965.  On September 30, 2025, Council for Opportunity in Education (COE) filed suit against U.S. Department of Education (DOE) in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. COE is a membership organization consisting of colleges and non-profits that participate in the federal TRIO program. The TRIO programs were established in the 1960s to help…

Case Is Ongoing

SPEECH AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
American Association of University Professors v. Trump

3:25-cv-07864 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Sept. 16, 2025

This case is about the Trump administration’s termination of federal grants to the University of California system and the administration’s withholding of federal funding and grants to incentivize universities to eradicate “diversity, equity, and inclusion” from their campuses. This case is substantially related to Thakur et al v. Trump et al.  On September 16, 2025, labor unions and associations that represent faculty, students, and academic employees throughout the University of California Sy…

Case Is Ongoing

PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
Green & Healthy Homes Initiative, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

1:25-cv-01096 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: April 2, 2025

Closed Date: June 17, 2025

This case challenged the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to terminate plaintiffs’ environmental grants without notice or substantive reason. These grants, awarded in 2024 under the Biden Administration, comprised $8 million given directly to each plaintiff and access to a further $52 million for plaintiffs to distribute among other community-based environmental initiatives in their respective cities. In February 2025—under the Trump Administration—plaintiffs each received …

Judgment for Plaintiff

Appeal Pending