Filed Date: April 18, 1988
Closed Date: Nov. 1, 1990
Clearinghouse coding in progress
(This summary is temporary while we research the case). This case challenged abortion restrictions in Pennsylvania, including parental consent and spousal consent. Ultimately, the Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe v. Wade's holding that abortion is a fundamental right and that any abortion restriction that posed an undue burden on a woman's access to care was unconstitutional. Casey was later reversed in Dobbs.
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8775758/parties/planned-parenthood-v-casey/
Huyett, Daniel Henry (Pennsylvania)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8775758/planned-parenthood-v-casey/
Last updated Sept. 27, 2025, 8:57 a.m.
State / Territory: Pennsylvania
Case Type(s):
Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues
Key Dates
Filing Date: April 18, 1988
Closing Date: Nov. 1, 1990
Case Ongoing: No