Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
502 cases, 4,135 documents
Ordered by
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
PFLAG, Inc. v. Donald J. Trump

8:25-cv-00337 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Feb. 4, 2025

Case Ongoing

This case is about the legality of two executive orders, EO 14168 and EO 14187, issued by President Trump that aimed to restrict access to gender-affirming medical care for transgender individuals under the age of nineteen. On February 4, 2025, PFLAG Inc., alongside the American Association of Physicians for Human Rights (GLMA) and several individual plaintiffs, filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The plaintiffs sued President Trump, the U.S. Dep…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Kingdom v. Trump

1:25-cv-00691 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 7, 2025

Case Ongoing

This putative class action challenges Trump’s Executive Order 14168 banning gender-affirming health care for incarcerated individuals in federal prison. On March 7, 2025, three incarcerated transgender individuals filed a class-action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which was assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. They were represented by the ACLU and the Transgender Law Center. The plaintiffs defined the class as, “[a]ll persons who are or will be incarc…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Fain v. Crouch

3:20-cv-00740 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia

Filed Date: Nov. 12, 2020

Case Ongoing

On November 12, 2020, three private plaintiffs (individually, “CF”, “ZM”, and “BM”; collectively, “Plaintiffs”), represented by Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund and private counsel, filed a class action lawsuit against the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), West Virginia Bureau for Medical Services (“BMS”), West Virginia Public Employees Insurance Agency (“PEIA”), and the Health Plan of West Virginia, Inc. (“HPWV”), (collectively, “WVA”), in the United States…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
State of Texas v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

5:24-cv-00204 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 4, 2024

Case Ongoing

This is a case about the validity of privacy rules established by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) which restrict states' investigating authority in connection with reproductive health care. On September 4, 2024, the State of Texas filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas against HHS, the Secretary of HHS, and the Director of the HHS Office for Civil Rights. Texas challenged a rule enacted by HHS in 2024 ("the 2024 Rule") related to the H…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Keohane v. Jones

4:16-cv-00511 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida

Filed Date: Aug. 15, 2016

Closed Date: Nov. 17, 2021

This is a case about access to gender affirming care in Florida prisons. The plaintiff was a transgender woman imprisoned in a men's correctional facility in the custody of the Florida Department of Corrections (“FDOC”). On August 15, 2016, the plaintiff filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida against the Secretary of the FDOC, an FDOC medical official, and the warden and medical director of the prison in which the plaintiff was incarcerated. Represented …
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Southampton Community Healthcare v. Bailey

23SL-CC01673 | Missouri state trial court

Filed Date: April 24, 2023

Closed Date: June 12, 2023

This is a case about access to gender-affirming care for transgender people in Missouri. On April 13, 2023, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey promulgated an emergency regulation that imposed restrictions on gender-affirming care for both minors and adults. The regulation was the first of its kind in that it applied to adults too, not just minors. It required providers to inform patients of certain claims and to ensure that patients were eligible for the care. To be eligible, patients must…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Van Garderen v. Montana

DV-32-2023-0000541-CR | Montana state trial court

Filed Date: May 9, 2023

Case Ongoing

This case centers around SB 99, a bill that bans evidence-based gender-affirming care for transgender minors in Montana but does not ban those same treatments for cisgender minors. The bill was set to go into effect on October 1, 2023. On May 9, 2023, two families with transgender youth—who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria and are currently receiving gender-affirming care—and two medical providers, represented by the ACLU and Lambda Legal, filed suit in Montana's district court for Mis…
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS/CONTRACTING
Hammons v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

1:20-cv-02088 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: July 16, 2020

Case Ongoing

care. On July 16, 2020, a transgender man, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and private counsel, sued the University of Maryland Medical Systems Corporation (“UMMS”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The plaintiff was scheduled to have a hysterectomy as part of his gender-affirming care prescribed by his doctor at UMMS-owned St. Joseph Medical Center (“SJMC”), a Catholic institution bound by the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Se…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood of Montana v. State of Montana

DDV-2013-407 | Montana state trial court

Filed Date: May 29, 2013

Case Ongoing

This lawsuit is about challenges to laws requiring parental consent for minors attempting to access abortion care. In 2011, the Montana Legislature enacted Legislative Referendum 120. After Montana voters adopted it in the November 2012 election, it took effect January 1, 2013 (the "2012 Referendum"). Under the 2012 Referendum, a minor under the age of 16 seeking an abortion had to notify a parent or seek judicial bypass by petitioning the youth court for an order waiving the notice requirement…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. Urmanski

2024AP330 | Wisconsin state supreme court

Filed Date: Feb. 22, 2024

Case Ongoing

This case is about a challenge to 176-year-old Wisconsin Statute § 940.04, that prohibited abortions except in the case to save the life of the mother. On February 22, 2024, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, a physician, and four private plaintiffs (collectively, “Planned Parenthood”), represented by private counsel, filed a petition to commence an original action in the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Planned Parenthood sought to challenge Wisconsin Statute 940.04 (“WS 940.04”), enacted in 1849, that …