Case: United States v. Plaquemines Parish School Board

2:66-cv-00071 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Filed Date: Jan. 1, 1966

Closed Date: April 30, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated public schools were unconstitutional. However, Plaquemines Parish refused to desegregate, so the U.S. government brought suit in 1966 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. This case was assigned to District Judge Christenberry.  In August 1966, the court entered a preliminary injunction barring the defendants from discriminating on the basis of race or color.  After substantial litigation, th…

In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated public schools were unconstitutional. However, Plaquemines Parish refused to desegregate, so the U.S. government brought suit in 1966 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

This case was assigned to District Judge Christenberry.  In August 1966, the court entered a preliminary injunction barring the defendants from discriminating on the basis of race or color.  After substantial litigation, the plaintiffs won the action in 1971. The case resulted in a consent decree that mandated desegregation efforts for decades. In 1975, the district court concluded that "the relief provided in the court's orders had resulted in the elimination of the effects of past discrimination." The Court stated that it would "retain jurisdiction of the case for one year." 

Implementation work continued; an Associated Press article stated that "Plaquemines Superintendent Shelley Ritz said Justice Department officials still visited every year as recently as 2023 and requested data on topics including hiring and discipline."

On April 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice and the defendants stipulated jointly to dismiss the half century old consent decree providing for the desgregation of public school in Plaquemines Parish, with prejudice.  Their first filing stated that the because the stipulation was pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), it did not require a court order. Because Judge Christenberry had died (in 1975), the chief judge reassigned the case to a new judge--Brandon Long. The parties then refiled their stipulation on April 29, 2025, "out of an abundance of caution."  

Summary Authors

Claire Pollard (11/11/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69939010/parties/united-states-v-plaquemines-parish-school-board/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Darlington, Andrew (Louisiana)

Geissler, R. Jonas (Louisiana)

Attorney for Defendant

Brungard, Morgan (Louisiana)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
190-1

2:66-cv-00071

Docket (scanned non-digital)

April 22, 2025

April 22, 2025

Docket
1

2:66-cv-00071

Docket (scanned pre-digital)

April 22, 2025

April 22, 2025

Docket
190

2:66-cv-00071

Joint Stipulation of Dismissal

April 22, 2025

April 22, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
196

2:66-cv-00071

Joint Stipulation of Dismissal

April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69939010/united-states-v-plaquemines-parish-school-board/

Last updated Nov. 19, 2025, 7:19 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

DOCKET SHEET of 66cv71. Documents 1-190 originally maintained on paper. (sek) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

April 22, 2025

April 22, 2025

Clearinghouse
190

STIPULATION of Dismissal with prejudice by All Parties. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits)(sek) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

1 Exhibits

View on RECAP

April 22, 2025

April 22, 2025

Clearinghouse
191

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll as Counsel of Record attorneys R. Jonas Geissler and Andrew Darlingon by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits, # 2 Proposed Order)(sek) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

192

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll as Counsel of Record as to attorney Morgan Brungard by All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits, # 2 Proposed Order)(sek) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

193

Ordered that case be randomly reallotted another section of this court; case randomly reallotted to Judge Brandon S. Long, by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown Date Signed: 4/24/2025 (sek) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

April 24, 2025

April 24, 2025

194

ORDER granting 191 Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record for Attorney R. Jonas Geissler, Andrew Darlington for USA. Signed by Judge Brandon S. Long on 4/29/2025. (meb) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

195

ORDER granting 192 Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record for Attorney Morgan Brungard for Lorena E Bakright, Frederick G Deiler, E J Elizey, Sidney J Gleason, Clarence Kirby, Anthony Maltese, H F. S. McLaughlin, Jr, S A Moncla, Berchmans J Perez, Dallas A Picou, Plaquemines Parish School Board, Clarence Ragas. Signed by Judge Brandon S. Long on 4/29/2025. (meb) (Entered: 04/29/2025)

April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

196

Joint STIPULATION of Dismissal with prejudice by USA, All Defendants (Brungard, Morgan) Modified text/filers on 4/30/2025 (meb). (Entered: 04/29/2025)

April 29, 2025

April 29, 2025

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory:

Louisiana

Case Type(s):

School Desegregation

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations Involving the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Reversing Course on Existing Litigation

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1966

Closing Date: April 30, 2025

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The U.S. government.

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Plaquemines Parish School Board (Plaquemines), County

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Louisiana 2:66-cv-00071

Available Documents:

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Relief Sought:

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Monitoring

Reporting

Issues

General/Misc.:

School/University Facilities

School/University policies

Affected Race(s):

Black