Filed Date: Nov. 10, 2025
Case Ongoing
Clearinghouse coding in progress
(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.)
On November 10, 2025, Plaintiff, a U.S. manufacturer and importer, sued CBP over the Trump Administration's IEEPA-based tariff regime. Its complaint alleged that the February 2025 “Trafficking Tariff Orders,” duties related to Chinese opioids, and the large “Reciprocal Tariff” expansion imposed undue burdens on imports, forced needless reclassification, and disrupted supply chains. Plaintiffs argued that appellate courts have already held these executive orders unlawful under V.O.S. Selections v. Trump. Plaintiff requested a declaration invalidating the tariffs, an injunction against further collection, suspension of liquidation, and full refunds.
This case is ongoing.
Mazak Corporation v. United States, U.S. Court of International Trade (2025)
Sumitomo Chemical America Inc. v. United States, U.S. Court of International Trade (2025)
NGK Automotive Ceramics USA, Inc. v. United States, U.S. Court of International Trade (2025)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71897379/parties/standex-international-corporation-dba-standex-scientific-solutions-v-us/
Cannistra, Daniel J. (- International -)
Wolff, Daniel William (- International -)
Attorney-in-Charge, Attorney-in-Charge (- International -)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71897379/standex-international-corporation-dba-standex-scientific-solutions-v-us/
Last updated Nov. 13, 2025, 1:51 p.m.
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority
Special Collection(s):
Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government
Key Dates
Filing Date: Nov. 10, 2025
Case Ongoing: Yes
Case Details
Other Dockets:
U.S. Court of International Trade 1:25-cv-00253
Available Documents: