Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
7,924 cases
Ordered by
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
United States v. Dugan

2:25-cr-00089 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: April 24, 2025

This case was a highly unusual federal criminal prosecution of a sitting state court judge—who was alleged by the Trump Administration to have interfered with an immigration arrest. On April 24, 2025, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Wisconsin indicted Wisconsin Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan on two counts: (1) obstruction of a federal administrative proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 1505, and (2) concealment of a person from arrest under 18 U.S.C. § 1071. The case was assigned to U.S. Di…

Case Is Ongoing

DISABILITY RIGHTS
Day v. District of Columbia

1:10-cv-02250 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Dec. 23, 2010

The plaintiffs, institutionalized individuals in the District of Columbia with disabilities, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on December 23, 2010. The complaint alleged that the District of Columbia had policies and procedures that force the unnecessary institutionalization of people with disabilities who could live in the community with appropriate services. The plaintiffs claimed that these policies, which erected barriers to receiving long-term care…
SPEECH AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
GLBT Youth in Iowa Schools Task Force v. Reynolds

4:23-cv-00474 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

Filed Date: Nov. 28, 2023

The Iowa governor signed SF 496 into law on May 26, 2023. SF 496 includes an Age-Appropriate Standard, an Identity and Orientation Prohibition, a Library Restriction provision (together, the Book Restriction provisions), and a Parental Notice provision. The Age-Appropriate Standard dictates that school libraries must contain “only age-appropriate materials” which cannot include “any material with descriptions or visual depictions of a sex act.” SF 496 defines sex act broadly and does not accoun…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Hassan v. Reese

2:25-cv-01139 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: June 30, 2025

This case concerned alleged unequal access to religious accommodations for Muslim inmates in Oregon prisons. On June 30, 2025, three Muslim inmates filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Pendleton Division, against the Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC). The plaintiffs, represented by Public Accountability and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), brought two claims. First, they alleged disparate holiday accommodations under the Equal Protection …
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Illinois Baptist State Association v. Illinois Department of Insurance

2020MR000325 | Illinois state trial court

Filed Date: June 10, 2020

This case is about a challenge to an Illinois law requiring health insurance policies to provide coverage for abortions. On June 10, 2020, the Illinois Baptist State Association, two Illinois corporations–Southland Smiles, Ltd. and Rock River Cartage, Inc.–and two Illinois residents filed suit against the Illinois Department of Insurance and its Director (collectively, the “Illinois Department of Insurance” or “IDOI”)) in state trial court. The plaintiffs sought judicial review of the state’s R…

Judgment for Defendant

Appeal Pending

PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
State of Oregon v. Trump

3:25-cv-01756 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2025

[This summary is temporary while we research the case.] On September 28, 2025, the State of Oregon sued President Trump, among others, for federalizing members of the Oregon National Guard for deployment in Portland, Oregon, to participate in civilian law enforcement. Plaintiff believes defendant's actions violate the 10th Amendment and the Posse Comitatus Act.

Case Is Ongoing

PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
Thakur v. Trump

3:25-cv-04737 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: June 4, 2025

This case is about the alleged unlawful termination, suspension, or reduction of federal research grants to University of California researchers under a series of executive orders issued by President Trump and directives from the Department of Governmental Ethics (DOGE). On June 4, 2025, a group of University of California researchers, faculty, staff, academic appointees, and employees filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Pre…

Preliminary Injunction Granted

Appellate Stay of Trial Court Relief Denied

IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Immigrant Advocates Response Collaborative v. U.S. Department of Justice

1:25-cv-02279 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: July 16, 2025

This case challenges a coordinated set of federal immigration enforcement policies—referred to as a “campaign” of courthouse arrests—that authorize arrests in immigration courts, the abrupt dismissal of removal proceedings, and the placement of noncitizens into expedited removal. These policies are allegedly intended to deprive noncitizens of their rights by subjecting them to immediate arrest and removal while attending or appearing in court. On July 16, 2025, Immigrant Advocates Response Coll…

Case Is Ongoing

PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
Danziger v. United States

1:25-cv-01241 | U.S. Court of Federal Claims

Filed Date: July 28, 2025

[This summary is temporary while we research the case.] On July 28, 2025, plaintiff sued the United States for their mass termination of United States Agency for International Development ("USAID")  Personal Services Contractor ("PSC") contractors—including Named Plaintiff and those similarly situated—was unlawful, an abuse of discretion, and conducted in bad faith.

Case Is Ongoing

IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
CoreCivic, Inc. v. Leavenworth, Kansas, City of

2:25-cv-02457 | U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas

Filed Date: Aug. 8, 2025

[This summary is temporary while we research the case.] On August 8, 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. filed suit against the City of Leavenworth, Kansas and its City Commission Members over the passage of Resolution No. B-2394. Plaintiffs claim that resolution No. B-2394 substantially interferes with and obstructs the Congressionally funded and approved enforcement of federal immigration law by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”).  In particular, Resolution No. B-2394 prohibits performance of…

Case Is Ongoing