Case: The Advocates For Human Rights v. BONDI

1:26-cv-00865 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 12, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

The Advocates for Human Rights, a Minneapolis-based non-profit organization that monitors U.S. Immigration Court operations, filed a complaint on March 12, 2026, against several Department of Justice officials in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judge Rudolph Contreras is presiding over this case. The organization alleged that it had operated an Immigration Court Observation Project at the Fort Snelling Immigration Court since 2017, with volunteers and staff regula…

The Advocates for Human Rights, a Minneapolis-based non-profit organization that monitors U.S. Immigration Court operations, filed a complaint on March 12, 2026, against several Department of Justice officials in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judge Rudolph Contreras is presiding over this case. The organization alleged that it had operated an Immigration Court Observation Project at the Fort Snelling Immigration Court since 2017, with volunteers and staff regularly observing removal and bond proceedings under federal regulations requiring immigration court hearings to be generally open to the public. Beginning in early 2025, however, the Fort Snelling Immigration Court increasingly limited or completely blocked public access to hearings, both in-person and by Webex, without prior notice or explanation. These restrictions included locked courtroom doors, ejection of observers from virtual hearings, blanket closure notices, and arbitrary access policies that prevented observers from attending proceedings even when respondents and their attorneys gave permission. The complaint asserted four counts under the Administrative Procedure Act and First Amendment, alleging the restrictions were arbitrary, capricious, implemented without required notice-and-comment procedures, and violated constitutional rights. The organization sought declaratory and injunctive relief requiring defendants to comply with federal regulations governing public access to immigration proceedings.

This case is ongoing.

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72455259/parties/the-advocates-for-human-rights-v-bondi/


Judge(s)

Contreras, Rudolph (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Nagy, Brandon R. (District of Columbia)

Reiter, Harvey L. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:26-cv-00865

Complaint

March 12, 2026

March 12, 2026

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72455259/the-advocates-for-human-rights-v-bondi/

Last updated March 17, 2026, 9:15 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-12294683) filed by The Advocates For Human Rights. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit List, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits 1-16, # 4 Summons P. Bondi via DC US Attorney, # 5 Summons P. Bondi via J. Sullens, # 6 Summons D. Margolin, # 7 Summons T. Riley, # 8 Summons E. Dillow, # 9 Summons D. Margolin via US Attorney, # 10 Summons T. Riley via US Attorney, # 11 Summons E. Dillow via US Attorney)(Nagy, Brandon) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/12/2026) (zmtm). (Entered: 03/12/2026)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Exhibit List

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Exhibits 1-16

View on PACER

4 Summons P. Bondi via DC US Attorney

View on PACER

5 Summons P. Bondi via J. Sullens

View on PACER

6 Summons D. Margolin

View on PACER

7 Summons T. Riley

View on PACER

8 Summons E. Dillow

View on PACER

9 Summons D. Margolin via US Attorney

View on PACER

10 Summons T. Riley via US Attorney

View on PACER

11 Summons E. Dillow via US Attorney

View on PACER

March 12, 2026

March 12, 2026

Clearinghouse
2

SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

March 12, 2026

March 12, 2026

3

NOTICE of Appearance by Harvey L. Reiter on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Reiter, Harvey) (Entered: 03/12/2026)

March 12, 2026

March 12, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

March 12, 2026

March 12, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zmtm)

March 12, 2026

March 12, 2026

4

Appear Pro Hac Vice

March 17, 2026

March 17, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

March 17, 2026

March 17, 2026

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Public Benefits/Government Services

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 12, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Case Details

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:26-cv-00865

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Recommended Citation