Case: United States v. State of Connecticut

3:26-cv-00568 | U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut

Filed Date: April 13, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is about the federal government challenging state and local immigration policies.  The United States filed a lawsuit against Connecticut and New Haven on April 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, challenging state and local immigration policies that allegedly interfere with federal enforcement efforts. The complaint alleges that Connecticut's Trust Act and Policy Guidance, along with New Haven's Executive Order, unlawfully restrict law enforcement coo…

This case is about the federal government challenging state and local immigration policies. 

The United States filed a lawsuit against Connecticut and New Haven on April 13, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, challenging state and local immigration policies that allegedly interfere with federal enforcement efforts. The complaint alleges that Connecticut's Trust Act and Policy Guidance, along with New Haven's Executive Order, unlawfully restrict law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities by prohibiting compliance with immigration detainers, limiting communication about custody status, and restricting federal access to interview detained individuals. The federal government brought eight counts under the Supremacy Clause and Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) against the defendants, including Connecticut's Governor, Attorney General, and New Haven's Mayor in their official capacities, alleging violations of the Supremacy Clause and federal immigration statutes. The United States seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to invalidate these policies, along with attorneys' fees and costs.

This case was assigned to District Judge Alvin W. Thompson.

On July 6, 2026, the defendants filed motions to dismiss. First, they argued that the Trust Act and Order did not conflict with or expressly preempt federal immigration law, as they required compliance with federal statutes and did not regulate or discriminate against federal enforcement activities. Further, they argued that the United States lacked standing to bring the claims, as it could not demonstrate injury in fact, traceability, or redressability. Lastly, the defendants argued that their actions were protected by the Tenth Amendment anticommandeering. 

On July 27, the government filed a cross motion for summary judgment, arguing that the laws were expressly and impliedly preempted by federal immigration statutes, including 8 U.S.C. § 1373(a) and 1644, and conflicted with Congress’s enforcement objectives under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). It further contended that the laws violated intergovernmental immunity by discriminating against federal authorities and impermissibly regulating federal functions. The United States also asserted sovereign standing to challenge the laws, which it claimed obstructed federal immigration enforcement and were redressable by injunctive relief. 

As of October 2, 2026, this case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Haleigh Knowles (10/2/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73183416/parties/united-states-v-state-of-connecticut/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

Antaya, Colin S. (Connecticut)

Archer, Patrick Graham (Connecticut)

Donovan, Margaret (Connecticut)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Dooley, Tadhg (Connecticut)

Ghinaglia, Armando (Connecticut)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

3:26-cv-00568

Complaint

The United States of America v. State of Connecticut et al.

April 13, 2026

April 13, 2026

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73183416/united-states-v-state-of-connecticut/

Last updated Oct. 2, 2026, 2:28 p.m.

Docket for: United States v. State of Connecticut
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 13, 2026

COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by United States. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Story, Jackson) (Entered: 04/13/2026)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Exhibit

View on PACER

3 Exhibit

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 April 13, 2026

Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/13/2026.(Murphy, T) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
3 April 13, 2026

Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/12/2026 Discovery due by 10/13/2026 Dispositive Motions due by 11/17/2026 Signed by the Clerk on 4/13/2026.(Gaskins, A) Modified to add the Clerk on 4/14/2026 (Gaskins, A). (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
4 April 13, 2026

ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 4/13/2026.(Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
5 April 13, 2026

Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including presiding over a jury or non-jury trial) and to order the entry of final judgment.(Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
6 April 13, 2026

Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research: Attorneys and pro se litigants alike should exercise great caution in submitting any AI-generated language in filings before the Court. Use of AI without verification of the accuracy of the information it generates like any other shoddy research method from other sources or tools implicates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the central purpose of which is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus to streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts. Rule 11 applies fully to actions filed by pro se litigants.Therefore, all parties are on notice that the Court has a no-tolerance policy for any briefing (AI-assisted or not) that hallucinates legal propositions or otherwise severely misstates the law. Such filings will often result in sanctions absent reasonable excuse. See generally Willis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n et al, No. 3:25-CV-516-BN, 2025 WL 1408897 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025). Signed by Clerk on 4/13/2026.(Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
7 April 13, 2026

Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 4/13/2026.(Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
April 13, 2026

Request to Issue Summons

April 13, 2026

Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Story, Jackson)

April 13, 2026

Case Assignment

April 13, 2026

CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Alvin W. Thompson assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti. (Freberg, B)

8 April 14, 2026

NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 6 Notice re: AI-Assisted Research,,,, 4 Electronic Filing Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, 1 Complaint filed by USA, 7 Standing Protective Order, 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 5 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Signed by Clerk on 4/14/2026.(Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
9 April 14, 2026

ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *City of New Haven, Justin Elicker, Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jackson Story DOJ-Civ* *P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station* *Washington, DC 20044*. (Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
10 April 14, 2026

ELECTRONIC SUMMONS REISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *City of New Haven, Justin Elicker, Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jackson Story DOJ-Civ* *P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station* *Washington, DC 20044*. (Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
April 14, 2026

Notice re: Disclosure Statement

April 14, 2026

NEW Case Assignment

April 14, 2026

Notice re: AI-Assisted Research

April 14, 2026

Electronic Summons Issued

11 April 16, 2026

SUMMONS Returned Executed City of New Haven served on 4/16/2026, answer due 5/7/2026; Justin Elicker served on 4/16/2026, answer due 5/7/2026. (Attachments: # 1 attachment)(Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/16/2026)

RECAP
12 April 16, 2026

SUMMONS Returned Executed Ned Lamont served on 4/15/2026, answer due 5/6/2026; State of Connecticut served on 4/15/2026, answer due 5/6/2026; William Tong served on 4/15/2026, answer due 5/6/2026. (Attachments: # 1 attachment, # 2 Attachment)(Gaskins, A) (Entered: 04/16/2026)

RECAP
13 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher M. Mattei on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Mattei, Christopher) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
14 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Donovan on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Donovan, Margaret) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
15 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Janelle Medeiros on behalf of Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong (Medeiros, Janelle) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
16 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Rondon on behalf of Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong (Rondon, Michael) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
17 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Edward David Rowley on behalf of Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong (Rowley, Edward) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
18 April 27, 2026

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until July 6, 2026 to Respond to the 1 Complaint by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker, Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong. (Medeiros, Janelle) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
19 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Allison Jacobs on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Jacobs, Allison) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
20 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Roderick Ryan Williams on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Williams, Roderick) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
21 April 27, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Colin S. Antaya on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Antaya, Colin) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

RECAP
April 27, 2026

Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/10/2026 (Kelsey, N)

22 April 28, 2026

MOTION to Intervene filed by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard.Responses due by 5/19/2026 (Attachments: # 1 Attachment, # 2 Civil cover sheet, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C)(Irizarry, Josie) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

1 Attachment

View on RECAP

2 Civil cover sheet

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit B

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit C

View on RECAP

RECAP
April 28, 2026

Set Deadlines/Hearings

23 April 30, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Harold Hongju Koh on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Koh, Harold) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

RECAP
24 April 30, 2026

ORDER: The defendants' Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 18 ) is hereby GRANTED, over objection, for good cause shown. The defendants shall respond to the complaint by July 6, 2026. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 4/30/2026. (Young, S.) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

RECAP
April 30, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

April 30, 2026

Answer deadline updated for City of New Haven to 7/6/2026; Justin Elicker to 7/6/2026; Ned Lamont to 7/6/2026; State of Connecticut to 7/6/2026; William Tong to 7/6/2026. (Ferguson, L.)

May 5, 2026

Update Answer Deadline

25 May 21, 2026

Public NOTICE and Judicial NOTICE by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

RECAP
26 June 2, 2026

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until 30 Days Following the Adjudication of Motions to Dismiss for Filing of Rule 26(f) Report by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker, Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong. (Mattei, Christopher) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

RECAP
27 June 3, 2026

ORDER: The defendants' consented-to Motion to Postpone Filing of Rule 26(f) Report and to Set a Briefing Schedule for Motions to Dismiss (ECF No. 26 ) is hereby GRANTED. The parties shall file a Rule 26(f) Report 30 days after the court has adjudicated any motion to dismiss. Any motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before July 6, 2026. Any opposition to the motion to dismiss is due 21 days after the filing of a motion to dismiss. Any reply in support of a motion to dismiss is due 14 days after the filing of any opposition to the motion to dismiss. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 6/3/2026. (SY) (Entered: 06/03/2026)

RECAP
June 3, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

June 3, 2026

Set Deadlines: Dispositive Motions due by 7/6/2026 (lf)

June 4, 2026

Set Deadlines/Hearings

28 June 11, 2026

AFFIDAVIT Signed By Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Sui Juris filed by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. (ag) (Entered: 06/11/2026)

RECAP
29 July 6, 2026

MOTION to Dismiss by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker.Responses due by 7/27/2026 (Mattei, Christopher) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

RECAP
30 July 6, 2026

Memorandum in Support re 29 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker. (Mattei, Christopher) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

RECAP
31 July 6, 2026

MOTION to Dismiss by Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong.Responses due by 7/27/2026 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support)(Medeiros, Janelle) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

RECAP
32 July 7, 2026

Proclaimation by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag) (Entered: 07/07/2026)

RECAP
33 July 13, 2026

MOTION for Attorney(s) Patrick Archer to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-8676132) by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker. (Antaya, Colin) (Entered: 07/13/2026)

RECAP
34 July 13, 2026

MOTION for Attorney(s) Toby Merrill to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-8676165) by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Additional Bar Memberships)(Antaya, Colin) (Entered: 07/13/2026)

RECAP
35 July 13, 2026

MOTION for Attorney(s) Erin Monju to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-8676171) by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Antaya, Colin) (Entered: 07/13/2026)

RECAP
36 July 13, 2026

MOTION for Attorney(s) Kayla Svihovec to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-8676191) by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Antaya, Colin) (Entered: 07/13/2026)

RECAP
37 July 14, 2026

ORDER granting 33 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Patrick Archer. Certificate of Good Standing due by 9/14/2026 Signed by Clerk on 7-14-2026. (ag) (Entered: 07/14/2026)

RECAP
July 14, 2026

Order on Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice

38 July 15, 2026

NOTICE by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag) (Entered: 07/15/2026)

RECAP
39 July 15, 2026

MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. (ag) (Entered: 07/15/2026)

RECAP
40 July 16, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re 33 MOTION for Attorney(s) Patrick Archer to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-8676132) by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker. (Archer, Patrick) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

RECAP
41 July 16, 2026

ORDER granting 34 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Toby Merrill. Certificate of Good Standing due by 9/14/2026 Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 7-16-26. (ag) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

RECAP
42 July 16, 2026

ORDER granting 35 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Erin Monju. Signed by Clerk on 7-16-26. (ag) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

RECAP
43 July 16, 2026

ORDER granting 36 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Kayla Svihovec. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 7-16-26. (ag) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

RECAP
July 16, 2026

Order on Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice

44 July 17, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Toby Merrill on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Merrill, Toby) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
45 July 17, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re 34 MOTION for Attorney(s) Toby Merrill to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-8676165) by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker. (Merrill, Toby) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
46 July 17, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Graham Archer on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Archer, Patrick) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
47 July 17, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Monju on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Monju, Erin) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
48 July 17, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Kayla Max Svihovec on behalf of City of New Haven, Justin Elicker (Svihovec, Kayla) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
49 July 17, 2026

MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of Defendants by 43 Cities, Counties, and Elected Officials. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Amici Curiae Brief)(Dooley, Tadhg) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
50 July 17, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Armando Ghinaglia on behalf of 43 Cities, Counties, and Elected Officials (Ghinaglia, Armando) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
51 July 17, 2026

MOTION for Attorney(s) Tinesha Zandamela to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-8684019) by 43 Cities, Counties, and Elected Officials. (Attachments: # 1 DC Certificate of Good Standing)(Dooley, Tadhg) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
52 July 17, 2026

MOTION for Attorney(s) Rupa Bhattacharyya to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-8684023) by 43 Cities, Counties, and Elected Officials. (Attachments: # 1 DC Certificate of Good Standing)(Dooley, Tadhg) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

RECAP
53 July 20, 2026

ORDER granting 51 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Tinesha Zandamela. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 7/20/2026. (ag) (Entered: 07/20/2026)

RECAP
54 July 20, 2026

ORDER granting 52 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Rupa Bhattacharyya. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 7/20/2026. (ag) (Entered: 07/20/2026)

RECAP
July 20, 2026

Order on Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice

55 July 21, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Tinesha Zandamela on behalf of 43 Cities, Counties, and Elected Officials (Zandamela, Tinesha) (Entered: 07/21/2026)

RECAP
56 July 24, 2026

NOTICE by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag) (Entered: 07/24/2026)

RECAP
57 July 27, 2026

Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by USA.Responses due by 8/17/2026 (Story, Jackson)

RECAP
58 July 27, 2026

Memorandum in Support re [57] Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 29, 30, 31) filed by USA. (Story, Jackson)

RECAP
59 July 27, 2026

Statement of Material Facts re [57] Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by USA. (Story, Jackson)

RECAP
60 July 30, 2026

MOTION for Janelle R. Medeiros to Withdraw as Attorney by Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong. (Medeiros, Janelle) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

RECAP
61 July 31, 2026

ORDER: Attorney Janelle R. Medeiros's Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (ECF No. 60 ) is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk shall terminate the appearance of Attorney Medeiros on behalf of the following defendants: the State of Connecticut; Ned Lamont, the Governor of Connecticut, in his official capacity; and William Tong, the Attorney General of Connecticut, in his official capacity. The docket sheet should also reflect that Attorney Medeiros has never represented the City of New Haven and Justin Elicker, Mayor of New Haven, in his official capacity. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 7/31/2026. (SY) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

RECAP
62 July 31, 2026

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until September 9, 2026 to file Reply Memoranda in Support of Motions to Dismiss and for Stay of Summary Judgment Briefing by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker, Ned Lamont, State of Connecticut, William Tong. (Mattei, Christopher) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

RECAP
July 31, 2026

Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

63 Aug. 3, 2026

NOTICE by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag) (Entered: 08/03/2026)

RECAP
64 Aug. 3, 2026

Objection re 31 MOTION to Dismiss, 29 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. (ag) (Entered: 08/03/2026)

RECAP
65 Aug. 3, 2026

OBJECTION re 57 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. (ag) (Entered: 08/03/2026)

RECAP
66 Aug. 3, 2026

ORDER: Any opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion for Extension of Time and Stay of Summary Judgment Briefing (ECF No. 62 ) shall be filed by August 4, 2026. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 08/03/2026. (JL) (Entered: 08/03/2026)

RECAP
Aug. 3, 2026

Order

Aug. 3, 2026

Set/Reset Deadlines as to 62 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until September 9, 2026 to file Reply Memoranda in Support of Motions to Dismiss and for Stay of Summary Judgment Briefing. Responses due by 8/4/2026. (lf)

67 Aug. 4, 2026

Memorandum in Opposition re 62 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until September 9, 2026 to file Reply Memoranda in Support of Motions to Dismiss and for Stay of Summary Judgment Briefing filed by USA. (Story, Jackson) (Entered: 08/04/2026)

RECAP
68 Aug. 5, 2026

ORDER: Defendants' Joint Motion for Extension of Time and Stay of Summary Judgment (ECF No. 62 ) is hereby GRANTED. The defendants' deadline to file reply briefs in support of their respective motions to dismiss is extended to September 29, 2026. Briefing on the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is STAYED until further order of the court. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 8/5/2026. (SY) (Entered: 08/05/2026)

RECAP
Aug. 5, 2026

Set/Reset Deadlines as to 31 MOTION to Dismiss, 29 MOTION to Dismiss. Defendants' Reply due by 9/29/2026. (lf)

Aug. 6, 2026

Set Motion and Rcmd Ruling Deadlines/Hearings

69 Aug. 11, 2026

NOTICE by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag)

RECAP
70 Aug. 11, 2026

NOTICE by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag)

RECAP
71 Aug. 14, 2026

NOTICE by 43 Cities, Counties, and Elected Officials (Zandamela, Tinesha)

RECAP
72 Aug. 18, 2026

NOTICE by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag)

RECAP
73 Aug. 18, 2026

NOTICE by Andrew Hamilton Pritchard (ag)

RECAP
74 Aug. 19, 2026

ORDER: Attorney Tinesha Zandamela's Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance (ECF No. [71]) is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk shall terminate the appearance of Attorney Zandamela on behalf of Amici Curiae 43 Cities, Counties, and Elected Officials. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 08/19/2026. (SO)

RECAP
75 Aug. 26, 2026

MOTION for Patrick Archer to Withdraw as Attorney by City of New Haven, Justin Elicker. (Archer, Patrick)

RECAP
76 Aug. 27, 2026

ORDER: Attorney Patrick Archer's Motion to Withdraw Appearance (ECF No. [75]) is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk shall terminate the appearance of Attorney Archer on behalf of the City of New Haven and Justin Elicker. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 8/27/2026. (SO)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Connecticut

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 13, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The United States federal government

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

City of New Haven, Connecticut

State

State of Connecticut

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Supremacy Clause

Other Dockets:

District of Connecticut 3:26-cv-00568

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Immigration/Border:

Sanctuary city/state

Recommended Citation