Case: Gilmore v. State of California

3:66-cv-45878 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Oct. 27, 1966

Closed Date: 2015

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1966, Robert Gilmore, an inmate at San Quentin, brought this suit against the California Department of Corrections (CDC) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiff alleged that policies regarding inmate access to law libraries, legal materials, and legal assistance violated his constitutional rights. The Gilmore case was consolidated with twenty-five other cases filed by inmates at facilities administered by the CDC. In 1970, the District Court issued a…

In 1966, Robert Gilmore, an inmate at San Quentin, brought this suit against the California Department of Corrections (CDC) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiff alleged that policies regarding inmate access to law libraries, legal materials, and legal assistance violated his constitutional rights. The Gilmore case was consolidated with twenty-five other cases filed by inmates at facilities administered by the CDC.

In 1970, the District Court issued an order enjoining the CDC from enforcing Prison Regulation 330.041, finding that it denied inmates reasonable access to the courts. Gilmore v. Lynch, 319 F.Supp. 105, (N.D.Cal.1970), on remand from, Gilmore v. Lynch, 400 F.2d 228, 231 (9th Cir.1968) (reversing district court's determination that case did not present substantial question of constitutional law requiring consideration by three-judge court under 28 U.S.C. § 2281). The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in a summary opinion. Younger v. Gilmore, 404 U.S. 15 (1971). In 1972, the three-judge panel approved the defendants proposed new regulations and ordered that the regulations be adopted.

In 1976, the CDC filed a compliance memorandum with the District Court, detailing the modifications made to the prison libraries. In 1977, the District Court denied the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint and ordered plaintiffs' counsel to prepare a final judgment in the matter.

Following negotiations on the issue of attorneys' fees, in 1979, the District Court awarded attorneys' fees to plaintiffs and ordered that the case be dismissed upon satisfaction of the payment of the fees. Six months later, the case was dismissed, subject to the right of plaintiffs to seek enforcement of the District Court's 1972 Order in the future.

There was no activity on the case for the next seventeen years.

In 1997, the defendants filed a motion under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), to terminate the 1972 injunction. The plaintiffs opposed the motion, arguing that the termination provision of the PLRA was unconstitutional, or that the PLRA's termination requirements had not been met. On January 13, 1998, the District Court (Judge Susan Y. Illston) granted the defendants' motion for termination, finding that the PLRA provisions, as applied, were constitutional. The plaintiffs appealed.

On appeal, the Gilmore case was consolidated with the case Thompson v. Gomez. On April 4, 2000, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded both cases. The Appellate Court (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher) held that the termination provision of the PLRA was constitutional but that both the Gilmore and Thompson District Courts should have taken evidence on the current circumstances at the prisons and examined the court record and the relief granted by the respective decrees in order to determine whether each was narrowly tailored and minimally intrusive, and should not have simply considered whether there were any explicit findings to this effect. Gilmore v. People of the State of California, 220 F.3d 987 (9th Cir. 2000). The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the District Court.

After informal negotiations between the parties, the CDC recognized that it needed additional time to determine the efficacy of various options to provide adequate law library resources. As a result, in 2002 the CDC decided not to renew its motion to terminate the 1972 injunction. The parties continued to investigate the conditions in the prisons and the options for ensuring adequate law library access.

During this period, inmates filed individual motions alleging that the CDC was violating the 1972 injunction by providing inadequate access. For example, on March 15, 2007, class member Charles T. Davis filed a pro se motion for order to show cause for civil and criminal contempt. Davis' motion alleged that the defendants violated the decree. The plaintiff class's attorneys investigated Davis' allegations and determined that no further action from the court was necessary; the defendants concurred. Accordingly, on April 23, 2007, the court denied Davis' motion. The court also directed that all future Gilmore-related grievances and motions put forth by pro se inmates be resolved informally between class counsel and defense counsel, without court intervention, unless counsel reach an unresolvable conflict.

On October 30, 2009, the state again filed a motion to terminate the 1972 injunction under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. On December 29, 2009, the District Court (Judge Illston) denied the defendants' motion for a protective order and their motion to bifurcate the hearing on their motion to terminate the 1972 injunction. 2009 WL 5218049. After conducting discovery, however, the plaintiffs withdrew their opposition to the termination motion on April 12, 2010. Accordingly, on April 16, 2010, the District Court granted the defendants' motion to terminate the 1972 injunction. On June 29, 2010, the parties agreed that the defendants would pay $149,669 in attorneys' fees and costs.

After the case was dismissed, an individual inmate filed a motion for injunctive relief for contempt, complaining that he has been denied sufficient access to the prison law library, in particular the law computer. He sought a temporary injunction requiring the warden of California Medical Facility, where he was incarcerated, to provide him with law library and law computer access. On September 7, 2010, the District Court issued an order regarding his motion informing him that the case was closed and that he would have to file his own case. In addition, other inmates continued to file motions for contempt. The District Court repeatedly responded that the case had been dismissed and that the inmates had to pursue independent cases.

On February 11, 2015, another inmate wrote a letter to the court alleging that the defendants were again denying access to the law library and legal materials. He include copies of letters he had written to the Prison Law Office, the plaintiffs' counsel in this case, describing the problems. As of February 5, 2016, the court has not responded to this letter.

Summary Authors

Chris Sullivan (8/19/2005)

Jessica Kincaid (2/5/2016)

Related Cases

Lancaster v. Tilton / Thompson v. Gomez, Northern District of California (1979)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5743295/parties/gilmore-v-people-of-california/


Judge(s)

Bright, Myron H. (North Dakota)

Chambers, Richard Harvey (Arizona)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Davis, Charles T. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Crown, Allen Robert (California)

de Kercor, Dianne (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:66-cv-45878

Docket (PACER)

Gilmore v. People of California

Feb. 18, 2003

Feb. 18, 2003

Docket

3:66-cv-45878

07-16524

Docket [PACER]

Gilmore v. People of California

Feb. 18, 2015

Feb. 18, 2015

Docket

68-22052

Opinion

Gilmore v. Lynch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Aug. 16, 1968

Aug. 16, 1968

Order/Opinion

400 F.2d 228

68-00626

Certiorari Denied

Lynch v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 1969

Feb. 26, 1969

Order/Opinion

393 U.S. 1092

3:66-cv-45878

Order Granting Relief

Gilmore v. Lynch

May 28, 1970

May 28, 1970

Order/Opinion

319 F.Supp. 105

70-00582

[Probable jurisdiction decision deferred]

Lynch v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 22, 1971

Feb. 22, 1971

Order/Opinion

401 U.S. 906

3:66-cv-45878

Order Denying Without Prejudice Motion to Strike Prayer for Damages

Gilmore v. Lynch

April 1, 1971

April 1, 1971

Order/Opinion

330 F.Supp. 326

70-00009

Per Curiam Opinion

Younger v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 8, 1971

Nov. 8, 1971

Order/Opinion

404 U.S. 15

3:66-cv-45878

Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Termination

Jan. 13, 1998

Jan. 13, 1998

Order/Opinion

98-15160

98-15198

Appellate Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

April 4, 2000

April 4, 2000

Order/Opinion

220 F.3d 987

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5743295/gilmore-v-people-of-california/

Last updated Oct. 29, 2026, 12:02 p.m.

Docket for: Gilmore v. People of California
ECF Number Date Description Link
174 Jan. 10, 2001

CLERK'S NOTICE case management conference set for 2:00 2/2/01 ; [3:66-cv-45878] (rcs, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 11/30/2001)

RECAP
175 Jan. 29, 2001

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Susan Illston : continuing case management conference (cc: all counsel) [3:66-cv-45878] (rcs, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 11/30/2001)

RECAP
176 Nov. 27, 2001

CLERK'S NOTICE Further case management conference conference set for 2:30 1/18/02 (counsel must file the joint case management conference statement one week prior to the conference; [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 11/30/2001)

RECAP
Jan. 8, 2002

RECEIVED Stipulation and request to continue case management conference submitted by defendant People of California [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF)

Jan. 8, 2002

RECEIVED Proposed Order continuing case management conference ( defendant People of California ) [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF)

177 Jan. 9, 2002

STIPULATION and REQUEST to continue case management conference. [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/10/2002)

RECAP
178 Jan. 9, 2002

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston Case management conference reset for 2:30 4/19/02 ; ( Date Entered: 1/10/02) (cc: all counsel) [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/10/2002)

RECAP
179 March 20, 2002

CLERK'S NOTICE Initial case management conference reset for 2:30 5/3/02 ; [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/21/2002)

RECAP
April 15, 2002

RECEIVED Stipulation and request to take case management conference off calendar; proposed order submitted by defendant People of California [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF)

180 April 16, 2002

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Susan Illston : to take case management conference off calendar ; dismissing case ; Counsel may schedule a further case management conference in the future ; appeal filing ddl 5/17/02 (cc: all counsel) [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/17/2002)

RECAP
181 Aug. 7, 2002

COPY of USCA Order: The renewed motion of appellants for attorneys fees in the amount of $29,184.16 is granted. [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/08/2002)

RECAP
182 Sept. 6, 2002

COPY of USCA Amended Order for attorneys fees: Attorneys fees in the amount of 23,229.05 is granted in the Gilmore matter and $29,184.16 in attorneys fees is granted in the Thompson matter. [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/06/2002)

RECAP
183 Feb. 18, 2003

NOTICE of Change of Attorney Assigment by defendant People of California of attorney Thomas S. Patterson [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 02/18/2003)

RECAP
184 July 12, 2005

MOTION before Judge Susan Illston for an Order to Show Cause re Contempt: Declaration of Willie Wisely by Willie Wisely. [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2016: # 1 envelop) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 07/12/2005)

RECAP
185 Aug. 24, 2005

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston for Service of Process. The clerk to serve counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for defendants re Motion [184-1]. The Court further invites either party to comment on the standing question presented in the motion. The parties should file their responses on or before 9/23/05. ( Date Entered: 8/25/05) (cc: all counsel) [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/25/2005)

RECAP
186 Sept. 23, 2005

RESPONSE by Plaintiff re order [185-1] [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/23/2005)

RECAP
187 Sept. 23, 2005

Comment by defendant re [184-1] motion for an Order to Show Cause re Contempt: Declaration of Willie Wisely [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/26/2005)

RECAP
188 Sept. 23, 2005

DECLARATION by Rob Churchill on behalf of defendant re Comment [187-1] [3:66-cv-45878] (ys, COURT STAFF) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/26/2005)

RECAP
189 Jan. 23, 2006

MOTION for Hearing on Order to Show Cause re Contmpt; Declaration of Willie Wisely in support by Wilie Wisely . (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2006) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2016: # 1 envelop) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/23/2006)

RECAP
190 Jan. 23, 2006

Ex Parte Motion for Transportation of Witnesses; Declaration of Willie Wisely. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2006) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/23/2006)

RECAP
191 Jan. 24, 2006

ORDER to show cause. Signed by Judge Illston on 1/23/06. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2006) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2016: # 1 Order) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/24/2006)

1 Order

View on PACER

RECAP
192 Jan. 24, 2006

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston denying 189 Motion for Hearing, denying 190 Ex Parte Application. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2006) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 01/25/2006)

RECAP
193 March 9, 2006

Received Document Stipulation and proposed order re: request for an extension of time to file the joint report concerning findings regardings law library materials by Robert O. Gilmore, Jr, Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, Willie Wisely. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2006) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/10/2006)

RECAP
194 March 9, 2006

Declaration of Edith Degraff in support of 195 plaintiffs' request for an extension of time to file joint report concerning findings regarding law library materials filed byRobert O. Gilmore, Jr, Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, Willie Wisely. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2006) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/10/2006)

RECAP
195 March 9, 2006

STIPULATION and Request for an extension of time to file the joint report concerning findings regarding law library materials by Robert O. Gilmore, Jr, Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, Willie Wisely. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2006) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/10/2006)

RECAP
196 March 9, 2006

Declaration of Megan Hagler in Support of 195 Stipulation and Request filed byRobert O. Gilmore, Jr, Inmates of San Quentin State Prison, Willie Wisely. (Related document(s) 195 ) (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2006) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/10/2006)

RECAP
March 10, 2006

Received Document Stipulation and Proposed Order re: Status Conference. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2006)

197 March 13, 2006

STIPULATION AND ORDER re Status Conference. Status Conference set for 4/14/06 at 2:30 p.m.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 3/13/6. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2006) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/14/2006)

RECAP
198 March 13, 2006

ORDER extending time to file the joint report concerning findings regarding law library materials to 3/31/06. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 3/10/06. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2006) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/14/2006)

RECAP
March 13, 2006

Set Deadlines/Hearings: Status Conference set for 4/14/2006 02:30 PM. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2006)

199 March 14, 2006

ORDER : This case shall be referred to the Court's electronic filing program pursuant to General Order 45. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 3/13/06. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2006) (Entered: 03/14/2006)

RECAP
March 14, 2006

CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2006)

200 March 31, 2006

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE REPORT filed by Robert O. Gilmore, Jr, Inmates of San Quentin State Prison. (Attachments: # 1 # 2)(Specter, Donald) (Filed on 3/31/2006) (Entered: 03/31/2006)

RECAP
201 March 31, 2006

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Robert O. Gilmore, Jr, Inmates of San Quentin State Prison re 200 Case Management Statement (Joint) (Specter, Donald) (Filed on 3/31/2006) (Entered: 03/31/2006)

RECAP
202 April 18, 2006

Minute Entry: Further Case Management Conference held on 4/14/2006 before Illston (Date Filed: 4/18/2006). () (ts, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 4/18/2006) (Entered: 04/18/2006)

RECAP
203 April 26, 2006

RESPONSE of Willie Wisely to re 200 Case Management Statement (Joint) : Declarations of Willie Wisely, Gavin Taylor by Willie Wisely. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2006) (Entered: 04/27/2006)

RECAP
204 Sept. 27, 2006

Declaration re Contempt filed byWillie Wisely. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2006) Additional attachment(s) added on 9/28/2006 (ys, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/28/2006)

RECAP
205 March 15, 2007

ORDER for service of process re Davis motion for OSC. Signed by Judge Illston on 3/15/07. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2007) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2016: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 03/15/2007)

1 Certificate of Service

View on PACER

RECAP
206 March 15, 2007

NOTICE of Motion and Motion for Order to Show Cause for Civil and Criminal Contempt by Charles T. Davis. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2007) (Entered: 03/16/2007)

RECAP
March 16, 2007

REMARK: Order directing adoption of regulations to implement previous order granting relief mailed to counsels for plaintiffs and defendants by US mail. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2007)

207 April 13, 2007

RESPONSE to 205 Order for Service of Process and Response Concerning Davis's Motion for an Order to Show Cause by Robert O. Gilmore, Jr, Inmates of San Quentin State Prison. (Specter, Donald) (Filed on 4/13/2007) Modified on 4/16/2007 (ys, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2016: # 1 response) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/13/2007)

RECAP
208 April 13, 2007

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of 207 by Robert O. Gilmore, Jr, Inmates of San Quentin State Prison (Specter, Donald) (Filed on 4/13/2007) Modified on 4/16/2007 (ys, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/13/2007)

RECAP
209 April 13, 2007

Declaration of M. Williams in Support of 207 Response ( Non Motion ) filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 207 ) (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2007) (Entered: 04/16/2007)

RECAP
210 April 13, 2007

Proposed Order denying Davis's motion for an order to show cause for civil and criminal contempt by People of California. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2007) (Entered: 04/16/2007)

RECAP
211 April 23, 2007

ORDER denying Davis's motion for an order to show cause and criminal contempt. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/23/07. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2007) (Entered: 04/23/2007)

RECAP
212 April 23, 2007

MOTION to Set Aside Class Counsel's Findings by Charles T. Davis. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2007) (Entered: 04/25/2007)

RECAP
213 April 25, 2007

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opposition by Charles T. Davis. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2007) (Entered: 04/25/2007)

RECAP
214 May 24, 2007

ORDER re motion of Charles T. Davis to set aside class counsel's findings (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2007) Modified on 5/24/2007 (SI, COURT STAFF).FILED IN ERROR (Entered: 05/24/2007)

RECAP
215 May 24, 2007

ORDER re motion of Charles T. Davis to set aside class counsel's findings. Signed by Judge Illston on 5/24/07. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2007) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2016: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 05/24/2007)

1 Certificate of Service

View on PACER

RECAP
216 May 31, 2007

MOTION for Sanctions for intentional breach of counsel's fiduciary duties by Charles T. Davis. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2007) (Entered: 05/31/2007)

RECAP
217 July 9, 2007

MOTION for final order of judgment so that plaintiff may appeal the Court's May 24, 2007 Order re 215 Order by Charles T. Davis. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2007) (Entered: 07/09/2007)

RECAP
218 July 20, 2007

NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Kenneth T. Roost (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 7/20/2007) (Entered: 07/20/2007)

RECAP
219 July 25, 2007

ORDER denying Motion of Charles T. Davis for final order of judgment (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2007) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2016: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ysS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 07/25/2007)

1 Certificate of Service

View on PACER

RECAP
220 Aug. 22, 2007

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 219 Order on Motion for Sanctions by Charles T. Davis. (Appeal Filing Fee: Billed) (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2007) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2007 (ys, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/23/2007)

RECAP
Aug. 22, 2007

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 220 Notice of Appeal. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2007)

Aug. 22, 2007

Copy of Notice of Appeal and Docket sheet mailed to all counsel. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2007)

Aug. 23, 2007

Mailed request for payment of docket fee to appellant (cc to USCA). (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2007)

Sept. 4, 2007

USCA Case Number 07-16524 for 220 Notice of Appeal. (rcs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2007)

Sept. 4, 2007

Received Document Letter dated 8/29/07 Re: petition for writ of mandate by Charles T. Davis. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2007)

221 Sept. 14, 2007

ORDER of USCA as to 220 Notice of Appeal : Dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 42(b). (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2007) (Entered: 09/17/2007)

RECAP
222 Sept. 17, 2007

MANDATE of USCA as to 220 Notice of Appeal: Dismissed. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2007) (Entered: 09/17/2007)

RECAP
223 Nov. 26, 2007

ORDER of USCA: Petition is denied. No motions for reconsideration, modification, or clarification of this order shall be filed or entertained. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2007) (Entered: 11/27/2007)

RECAP
224 Feb. 29, 2008

CLERK'S Second NOTICE Appeal Fee Past Due Notice. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2008) (Entered: 03/03/2008)

RECAP
225 March 6, 2008

Amended CLERK'S Second NOTICE - Appeal Fee Past Due Notice. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2008) (Entered: 03/06/2008)

RECAP
226 March 14, 2008

ORDER acknowledging receipt of notice (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2008) (Entered: 03/14/2008)

RECAP
227 March 17, 2008

Received Document/Notice of Motion/Affidavit by Larry B. Moore (forwarded to USCA). (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2008) (Entered: 03/17/2008)

RECAP
228 April 4, 2008

*Affidavit of Larry B. Moore purported class memober in support of appropriate course of action filed byLarry B. Moore.(ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2008) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/7/2008: # 1 env.) (ys, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/07/2008)

RECAP
229 June 5, 2008

NOTICE of Change of Address by plaintiffs' counsel, Donald Specter (Prison Law Office)(ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2008) (Entered: 06/06/2008)

RECAP
230 July 16, 2008

MOTION for alleged contempt for refusal of a party to obey conditions of negotiated settlement 18 U.S.C.A. ss401(3) by Robert Tunstall. (Attachments: # 1 env.)(ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2008) (Entered: 07/17/2008)

RECAP
231 Aug. 1, 2008

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CONTEMPT FINDING re 230 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2008) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/5/2008: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/01/2008)

1 cs

View on PACER

RECAP
232 June 23, 2009

* MOTION for Contempt for Refusal to Obey Conditions of Negotiated Settlement and Court Order filed by Robert Tunstall. (Attachments: # 1 env.)(ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2009) (Entered: 06/24/2009)

RECAP
233 July 1, 2009

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CONTEMPT FINDING re 232 .(SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/6/2009: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 07/01/2009)

1 cs

View on PACER

RECAP
234 Oct. 20, 2009

NOTICE by People of California NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS (McClain, Damon) (Filed on 10/20/2009) (Entered: 10/20/2009)

RECAP
235 Oct. 22, 2009

*Letter dated from Robert G. Stuter to the Court. (Attachments: # 1 env.)(ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009) (Entered: 10/26/2009)

RECAP
236 Oct. 30, 2009

MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by People of California. Motion Hearing set for 12/4/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
237 Oct. 30, 2009

Request for Judicial Notice re 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
238 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Gerald E. Atchley in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
239 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Dan Aylworth in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
240 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Richard Babb in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
241 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Kathy Balakian in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
242 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of R. Allen Baraldi in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
243 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Jean E. Bracy in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
244 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Rod Braly in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
245 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Glenn Brooking in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
246 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Lawrence A. Cone in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
247 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Minerva Cullers in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
248 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Troy Fennel in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
249 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Ovidio Gonzalez in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
250 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Robert Green in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
251 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Melany Heaslip-Thomas in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
252 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Dr. John L. Jackson in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
253 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Les Johnson in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
254 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of B. H. Van Klaveren in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
255 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Matthew K. Koop in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
256 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Nelson David Kraft in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
257 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Nancy Mcmahon in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
258 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Patricia E. Medved in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
259 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of Thomas Melvin in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
260 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of N. Olsen in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP
261 Oct. 30, 2009

Declaration of D. Paschal in Support of 236 MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES MOTION DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE INJUNCTION, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed byPeople of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) 236 ) (Roost, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/30/2009) (Entered: 10/30/2009)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Special Collection(s):

California's Prisoners' Rights Bar article

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 27, 1966

Closing Date: 2015

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Prisoners under sentence of death seeking declaration that PLRA was unconstitutional

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Prison Law Office

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

California Department of Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Northern District of California 3:66-cv-45878

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 98-15160

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 98-15198

Northern District of California 79-01630

Supreme Court of the United States 70-9

Supreme Court of the United States 582

Supreme Court of the United States 626

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 68-22052

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 07-16524

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

U.S. Supreme Court merits opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Attorneys fees

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Order Duration: 1966 - 2015

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Classification / placement

Religious programs / policies

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Administrative segregation

Law library access

Recommended Citation