Case: Muhammad v. Keve

1:77-cv-00221 | U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware

Filed Date: June 14, 1977

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1977, Muslim inmates of the Delaware Correctional Center filed a pro se suit in the District of Delaware against prison officials. The plaintiffs alleged violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that the food service policies and treatment by the staff violated their right to free expression of religion, because the dietary restrictions required by their Muslim observance were not being accommodated.Shortly after the complaint was filed in August …

In 1977, Muslim inmates of the Delaware Correctional Center filed a pro se suit in the District of Delaware against prison officials. The plaintiffs alleged violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that the food service policies and treatment by the staff violated their right to free expression of religion, because the dietary restrictions required by their Muslim observance were not being accommodated.

Shortly after the complaint was filed in August 1977, the District Court (Judge Walter Stapleton) partially granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction requiring defendants to assign one of the plaintiffs to work in the food preparation area and monitor the ingredients and procedures. It was at this time that the plaintiffs amended their complaint to include allegations of retaliatory treatment by the staff responding to plaintiffs' religiously inspired name changes.

After entry of the preliminary injunction, the case went to trial. Judge Stapleton held that the defendants had violated the plaintiffs' rights to free expression by failing to provide a pork-free diet and by prohibiting the plaintiffs' use of Muslim names. Muhammad v. Keve, 479 F. Supp. 1311 (D. Del. 1979). Judge Stapleton issued an injunction that assured plaintiffs' access to information regarding pork content in their food, delivery of mail addressed to their Muslim names, and freedom from punishment resulting from failure to acknowledge plaintiffs' non-Muslim names. In addition, each plaintiff was awarded judgment against Superintendent Redman in his favor in the amount of one dollar.

The docket indicates some attempt at enforcement by several inmates in the late 1990s. The inmate who filed the motion to enforce was among the plaintiffs who settled the case with the correctional center instead of going to the court. The court thus concluded the inmate did not have standing. Moreover, the court concluded the correctional center generally has complied with the court order to address the food and name issue.

Summary Authors

John Maksymonko (7/22/2005)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4221872/parties/muhammad-v-keve/


Judge(s)

Robinson, Sue Lewis (Delaware)

Stapleton, Walter King (Delaware)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Fatir, Amir (Delaware)

Attorney for Defendant

Parkins, John A. Jr. (Delaware)

Shannon, Joseph S. (Delaware)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:77-cv-00221

Docket [PACER]

April 30, 2013

April 30, 2013

Docket
71

1:77-cv-00221

Opinion

Oct. 22, 1979

Oct. 22, 1979

Order/Opinion

479 F.Supp. 1311

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4221872/muhammad-v-keve/

Last updated July 9, 2026, 5:36 a.m.

Docket for: Muhammad v. Keve
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 June 14, 1977

ORDER granting leave for petitioners to proceed in forma pauperis; defts. to answer complaint w/in 20 days of service of complaint; pltfs to mail copies of all communications with Court to John A. Parkins, Jr. Esq., Assistant Attorney General of DE. (Notice and copies to pltfs. and AG; exit copies to USM for each dft. ( signed by Judge Walter Stapleton ) (sm)

RECAP
2 June 14, 1977

COMPLAINT with motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit of poverty filed. (Notice and copy to AG of DE; exit copies to USM for each dft.) (sm)

RECAP
6 July 6, 1977

ANSWER to Complaint by Paul Keve, Raymond Anderson, John L. Sullivan, Walter Redman, George Nmn Pippin, Phyllis Patterson. (sm)

RECAP
13 Aug. 16, 1977

OPINION ( signed by Judge Walter Stapleton ) copies to: plaintiff, Attorney General (sm) Modified on 06/27/1997

RECAP
71 Oct. 22, 1979

OPINION ( signed by Judge Walter Stapleton ) copies to: counsel (sm)

Clearinghouse
75 April 9, 1980

FINAL JUDGMENT that non-obvious pork food will not be acceptable from vendors and will be returned; such food not be served to pltfs knowingly; dfts to notify all persons responsible of preparation of foods that no pork or pork derivatives be added during cooking process; pltfs to select inmate to read labels of all foods obtained for service to DCC inmates in accordance with Order; dfts shall revoke all policies prohibiting use by pltfs of Muslim names; dft Redman shall pay each pltf $1.00 in nominal damages. ( signed by Judge Walter Stapleton ) copies to: pltf. Wilbur Shabazz & Parkins (sm)

RECAP
76 June 18, 1997

MOTION by Masjid Muhammad, Wilbur Shabazz, Rauf Muhammad, Amin Hassan for Sanctions (ntl)

RECAP
77 June 25, 1997

CASE reassigned to Judge Sue L. Robinson . Notice to all parties. (ntl)

RECAP
78 June 26, 1997

RESPONSE by Paul Keve, Raymond Anderson, John L. Sullivan, Walter Redman, George Nmn Pippin, Phyllis Patterson to [76-1] motion for Sanctions (ntl)

RECAP
79 July 1, 1997

ORDER denying [76-1] motion for Sanctions ( signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson ) copies to: pltfs, cnsl (lf)

RECAP
80 July 2, 1997

Reply Brief Filed by Masjid Muhammad, Wilbur Shabazz, Rauf Muhammad, Amin Hassan to motion for sanction (lf)

RECAP
85 July 7, 1997

Return of undeliverable mail sent to plaintiff Rauf Muhammad (lf)

RECAP
81 July 9, 1997

Return of undeliverable mail sent to plaintiff Masjid Muhammad (lf)

RECAP
86 July 9, 1997

Return of undeliverable mail sent to plaintiff Rauf Muhammad (lf)

RECAP
87 July 9, 1997

Return of undeliverable mail sent to plaintiff Amin Hassan (lf)

RECAP
88 July 11, 1997

Return of undeliverable mail sent to plaintiff Wilbur Shabazz (lf)

RECAP
83 July 14, 1997

Return of undeliverable mail sent to plaintiff Masjid Muhammad (lf)

RECAP
84 July 14, 1997

Return of undeliverable mail sent to plaintiff Wilbur Shabazz (lf)

RECAP
82 July 16, 1997

Return of undeliverable mail sent to plaintiff Amin Hassan (lf)

RECAP
89 March 26, 1999

Letter dated 3/26/99 from court to pltf; re: response to letter rqsting status (lf)

RECAP
90 Oct. 13, 1999

Letter dated 10/13/99 from Robert Saunders to Judge Robinson; Re: status (lf)

RECAP
91 Oct. 20, 1999

Letter dated 10/20/99 from Stuart Drowos, Esq. to Judge Robinson; Re: response to pltf's rqst for status from court (lf)

RECAP
92 Oct. 28, 1999

Letter to Judge Robinson from Robt. Saunders in resp. to DI 91. (bkb)

RECAP
93 Dec. 13, 2006

Letter to Amir Fatir from Clerk dated 12/13/06 regarding returned papers; case has been closed; if filing new complaint, file in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (fmt)

RECAP
94 Jan. 10, 2007

Letter to Amir Fatir from Clerk returning papers; case is closed; papers will not be docketed; if wish to have papers docketed, a new complaint will need to be filed according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; enclosing necessary forms. (fmt)

RECAP
96 Aug. 13, 2007

MOTION to Enforce Judgment by Amir Fatir. (fmt)

RECAP
95 Aug. 16, 2007

Rejection Letter by the Court issued to Amir Fatir Regarding return of papers received on 8/13/07. (fmt)

RECAP
97 Sept. 24, 2007

ORDER, Set Briefing Schedule re pltf.'s motion to enforce jgm.: Defts.' Answering Brief due 10/22/2007. Pltf. may file a Reply Brief due 11/22/2007. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 9/24/07. (rlp)

RECAP
98 Sept. 25, 2007

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re all defendants: Entry of appearance of attorney Ophelia Michelle Waters. Attorney Joseph S. Shannon terminated. (fmt)

RECAP
99 Oct. 2, 2007

AFFIDAVIT of Amir Fatir filed by Amir Fatir. (fmt)

RECAP
100 Oct. 22, 2007

NOTICE of Appearance by Ophelia Michelle Waters on behalf of Department of Correction (Waters, Ophelia) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/23/2007 (fmt, ).

RECAP
101 Oct. 22, 2007

RESPONSE to Motion re [96] MOTION to Enforce Judgment (Department of Correction Administrators' Response to Plaintiff Amir Fatir's Motion to Enforce Judgment) filed by Department of Correction. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A# (2) Exhibit B# (3) Attachment No. 1# (4) Attachment No. 2# (5) Attachment No. 3# (6) Attachment No. 4)(Waters, Ophelia)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B

View on RECAP

3 Attachment No. 1

View on RECAP

4 Attachment No. 2

View on RECAP

5 Attachment No. 3

View on RECAP

6 Attachment No. 4

View on RECAP

RECAP
102 Oct. 23, 2007

AFFIDAVIT of Ron Hosterman re [101] Response to Motion, Executed Affidavit of Ron Hosterman filed by Department of Correction. (Waters, Ophelia)

RECAP
103 Oct. 26, 2007

REQUEST for Default as to all defendants - filed by Amir Fatir. (fmt)

RECAP
104 Nov. 16, 2007

REPLY BRIEF re [96] MOTION to Enforce Judgment filed by Amir Fatir. (fmt)

RECAP
105 Nov. 16, 2007

AFFIDAVIT of Amir Fatir filed by Amir Fatir. (fmt)

RECAP
106 Nov. 16, 2007

APPENDIX re [104] Reply Brief by Amir Fatir. (fmt)

RECAP
107 Jan. 25, 2008

ORDER; within ten days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a sur-reply to plaintiff's reply brief. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 1/25/08. (fmt)

RECAP
108 Jan. 30, 2008

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [107] Order - filed by Department of Correction. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order)(Waters, Ophelia)

1 Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
109 Feb. 15, 2008

SUR-REPLY BRIEF re [108] MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [107] Order filed by Phyllis Patterson, Paul Keve, Raymond Anderson, John L. Sullivan, Walter Redman, George Nmn Pippin. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit D1-D2 Affidavit of Cathy Escherich# (2) Exhibit D3-D4 Department of Correction Administrative Regulations# (3) Exhibit D5-D6 Affidavit of David Hoofnagle)(Waters, Ophelia)

1 Exhibit D1-D2 Affidavit of Cathy Escherich

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit D3-D4 Department of Correction Administrative Regulations

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit D5-D6 Affidavit of David Hoofnagle

View on RECAP

RECAP
110 Feb. 27, 2008

Plaintiff's Rebuttle to Defendant's Sur-Reply - filed by Amir Fatir. (nfn)

RECAP
111 Feb. 29, 2008

Supplement to Plaintiff's Rebuttle to Defendants' Sur-Reply - filed by Amir Fatir. (nfn)

RECAP
112 March 6, 2008

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 77-221. (fmt)

RECAP
113 March 6, 2008

ORDER denying [96] Motion to Enforce Judgment. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 3/5/08. (fmt)

RECAP
118 Feb. 19, 2009

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 2/18/2009. (nmf)

RECAP
130 Aug. 4, 2017

Letter to Clerk of Court from Abdul-Haqq Shabazz regarding copywork. (crb) (Entered: 08/04/2017)

RECAP
131 Aug. 4, 2017

Letter to Abdul-Haqq Shabazz from Clerk of Court regarding copywork - re 130 Letter. (crb) (Entered: 08/04/2017)

RECAP
132 Aug. 7, 2017

Second Letter to Abdul-Haqq Shabazz from Clerk of Court regarding copywork. (crb) (Entered: 08/07/2017)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Delaware

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 14, 1977

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Muslim inmates of prison bringing action against prison officials regarding eating pork in the prison

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State

Delaware Correctional Center

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Free Exercise Clause

Other Dockets:

District of Delaware 1:77-cv-00221

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

General/Misc.:

Food service / nutrition / hydration

Religious programs / policies

Discrimination Basis:

Religion discrimination

Recommended Citation