Case: Jolly v. Coughlin

1:92-cv-09026 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: Dec. 15, 1992

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On December 15, 1992, a Rastafarian inmate at the Southport Correctional Facility in Pine City, New York filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) 42 U.S.C. §2000b, against the New York State Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages, alleging that the defendants had violated his constitutional rights by s…

On December 15, 1992, a Rastafarian inmate at the Southport Correctional Facility in Pine City, New York filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) 42 U.S.C. §2000b, against the New York State Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages, alleging that the defendants had violated his constitutional rights by subjecting him to mandatory medical confinement when he refused to undergo a tuberculosis screening, which he believed to be in violation of his religious convictions.

On August 14, 1995, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Judge John George Koeltl) granted a preliminary injunction to the plaintiff. Jolly v. Coughlin, 894 F.Supp. 734 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). The defendants asked the court to modify the preliminary injunction order. On August 30, 1995, the district court denied the motion. Jolly v. Coughlin, 907 F.Supp. 63 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). The defendants appealed. On February 7, 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Judge Jose A. Cabranes), affirmed the district court's decision. 76 F.3d 468 (2nd Cir. 1996).

On February 27, 1997, prior to the beginning of trial, the defendants made an offer of judgment in the amount of $30,360, but the plaintiff refused it. On December 9, 1997, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding him injunctive relief and $30,000 in damages. The plaintiff and the defendants both asked the court to award them costs and attorneys' fees. On January 19, 1999, the district court (Judge Koeltl) awarded attorneys' fees and costs to the plaintiff for the time prior to February 27, 1997. The court also awarded costs to the defendants for the time after February 27, 1997, but denied the defendants' request for attorneys' fees. Jolly v. Coughlin, No.92-9026, 1999 WL 20895 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 1999). The plaintiff appealed. On January 24, 2000, the Second Circuit dismissed the appeal.

Summary Authors

Kristen Sagar (11/10/2006)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7628635/parties/jolly-v-coughlin/


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:92-cv-09026

Docket (PACER)

Sept. 6, 2000

Sept. 6, 2000

Docket
58

1:92-cv-09026

Memorandum

April 10, 1995

April 10, 1995

Order/Opinion

1995 WL 168810

71

1:92-cv-09026

Opinion and Order

Aug. 14, 1995

Aug. 14, 1995

Order/Opinion

894 F.Supp. 734

72

1:92-cv-09026

Memorandum and Order

Aug. 21, 1995

Aug. 21, 1995

Order/Opinion

1995 WL 495641

81

1:92-cv-09026

Opinion and Order

Aug. 30, 1995

Aug. 30, 1995

Order/Opinion

907 F.Supp. 63

95-02589

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Feb. 7, 1996

Feb. 7, 1996

Order/Opinion

76 F.3d 468

233

1:92-cv-09026

Opinion and Order

Jan. 19, 1999

Jan. 19, 1999

Order/Opinion

1999 WL 20895

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7628635/jolly-v-coughlin/

Last updated Aug. 17, 2025, 11:17 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
246

Sealed Document Attorney Notice to Retrieve

Aug. 9, 2018

Aug. 9, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER
247

Sealed Document Disposed

Sept. 14, 2018

Sept. 14, 2018

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 15, 1992

Closing Date: 2000

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Inmate whose claims arise out of arose out of his confinement in medical keeplock for over three years, without exercise and with only one shower per week, after he refused to take a tuberculosis screening test

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Sing Sing, State

New York State Department of Corrections, State

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Free Exercise Clause

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Damages

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Order Duration: 1995 - 0

Issues

General/Misc.:

Classification / placement

Religious programs / policies

Discrimination Area:

Medical Exam / Inquiry

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Medical care, general