Case: Wright v. Ducharme

2:90-cv-00396 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: March 19, 1990

Closed Date: 1997

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1986, a consent decree was implemented in which Washington State agreed to single-bunk the prisoners of the Washington State Reformatory (WSR). The consent decree arose out of a class action lawsuit by an inmate of the WSR who complained about the prison's policy of double-bunking the inmates. In 1988, WSR renovated the prison and began double-bunking the inmates during the renovation. On March 20, 1989, the same inmate spoke out publicly against double-bunking and persuaded numerous inma…

In 1986, a consent decree was implemented in which Washington State agreed to single-bunk the prisoners of the Washington State Reformatory (WSR). The consent decree arose out of a class action lawsuit by an inmate of the WSR who complained about the prison's policy of double-bunking the inmates. In 1988, WSR renovated the prison and began double-bunking the inmates during the renovation. On March 20, 1989, the same inmate spoke out publicly against double-bunking and persuaded numerous inmates to join him in demanding the enforcement of the consent decree. The next day he was placed in administrative segregation, and on March 30, 1989, he was transferred to another State facility.

On March 19, 1990, the inmate, represented by private attorneys, filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington against the prison officials for four alleged violations: 1) the administrative segregation was retaliation for exercising his constitutional rights; 2) his transfer to another facility violated his due process rights; 3) one of the reasons for his being administratively segregated was to punish him for trying to publish a dissenting newsletter; and 4) his equal protection rights were violated when the collaborator of the newsletter was not similarly placed in administrative segregation. The Court (Judge Barbara J. Rothstein) granted summary judgment to the defendants and plaintiff appealed.

In the appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Judges Thomas Tang, Alexander Kozinski, and Ferdinand Francis Fernandez) remanded plaintiff's retaliation claim against defendants for further proceedings, affirmed the lower court's holdings on the due process and equal protection claims; and reversed the court's finding of summary judgment for defendant. Wright v. Rebeiro, 988 F.2d 127 (Table), 1993 WL 51196 (9th Cir.(Wash.)). The Court also upheld the dismissal of several named defendants. Subsequently, both parties filed numerous motions, postponing the trial date several times, and on February 28, 1997, the Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief and terminated the case. However, it appears from the docket that it was not until May of that year that both parties agreed to a stipulated order of dismissal. In March of 1998, the Court ordered the return of sealed documents to counsel of record.

Summary Authors

Rebecca Bloch (3/18/2006)

People


Judge(s)

Fernandez, Ferdinand Francis (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Cornell, Cheri Yvonne (Washington)

Gendler, Michael W. (Washington)

Gordon, Patricia (Washington)

Attorney for Defendant

Judge, Daniel J. (Washington)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:90-cv-00396

Docket (PACER)

March 4, 1998

March 4, 1998

Docket

91-36087

Memorandum

Wright v. Rebeiro

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Feb. 26, 1993

Feb. 26, 1993

Order/Opinion

988 F.2d 127

Docket

Last updated March 24, 2025, 8:26 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
March 19, 1990

PROPOSED IFP, COMPLAINT & CONSENT (dktclk) (Entered: 03/21/1990)

PACER
1 March 22, 1990

ORDER by Magistrate John L. Weinberg granting application to proceed IFP (cc: all counsel) (RS) (Entered: 03/23/1990)

PACER
2 March 22, 1990

COMPLAINT (Summons(es) not issued) (RS) (Entered: 03/23/1990)

PACER
3 May 17, 1990

LETTER from Paul Wright requesting summons be served (RS) (Entered: 05/21/1990)

PACER
4 May 23, 1990

ORDER by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein of reference to Magistrate John L. Weinberg (cc: all counsel) (RS) (Entered: 05/23/1990)

PACER
5 May 30, 1990

ORDER by Magistrate John L. Weinberg directing service of process and procedures, Copies of summons and complaint to all defts' and to Washington State Attorney General's Office, response to complaint due within 45 days after service. (cc: all counsel) (dktclk) (Entered: 06/07/1990)

PACER
6 June 13, 1990

ACCEPTANCE/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE by defendant Larry Kincheloe on 6/9/90 (RS) (Entered: 06/14/1990)

PACER
7 June 13, 1990

ACCEPTANCE/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE by defendant Chase Riveland on 6/8/90 (RS) (Entered: 06/14/1990)

PACER
8 June 14, 1990

ACCEPTANCE/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE by defendant Jim Evans on 6/8/90 (RS) (Entered: 06/18/1990)

PACER
9 June 14, 1990

ACCEPTANCE/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE by defendant Kenneth Ducharme on 6/8/90 (RS) (Entered: 06/18/1990)

PACER
10 June 14, 1990

ACCEPTANCE/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE by defendant Veronica Rebeiro on 6/12/90 (RS) (Entered: 06/18/1990)

PACER
11 June 14, 1990

ACCEPTANCE/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE by defendant Howard Anderson on 6/8/90 (RS) (Entered: 06/18/1990)

PACER
12 June 22, 1990

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendants (dktclk) (Entered: 06/25/1990)

PACER
13 June 22, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding attorney [12-1] (dktclk) (Entered: 06/25/1990)

PACER
14 June 26, 1990

MOTION by plaintiff for order to take non-stenographic telephonic depositions assigned to Magistrate John L. Weinberg noted for 7/13/90 (RS) (Entered: 06/27/1990)

PACER
15 June 26, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion for order to take non- stenographic telephonic depositions [14-1] (RS) (Entered: 06/27/1990)

PACER
16 July 12, 1990

RESPONSE by defendant to PLAINTIFF'S motion for order to take non- stenographic telephonic depositions [14-1] (dktclk) (Entered: 07/16/1990)

PACER
17 July 14, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of SERVICE by MAILING of dft.'s response to pltf.'s motion to take non-stenographic telephonic depositions and related documents to pltf. on 7/12/90. (dktclk) (Entered: 07/17/1990)

PACER
18 July 19, 1990

REPLY by plaintiff Paul A Wright TO RESPONSE to motion for order to take non-stenographic telephonic depositions [14-1] (dktclk) (Entered: 07/24/1990)

PACER
19 July 25, 1990

ORDER by Magistrate John L. Weinberg GRANTING pltf.'s motion for order to take non-stenographic telephonic depositions [14-1] (cc: all counsel, pltf., BJR, JLW) , (dktclk) (Entered: 07/26/1990)

PACER
20 July 25, 1990

ANSWER by defendants'; jury demand (dktclk) (Entered: 07/27/1990)

PACER
21 July 25, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of SERVICE by mailing of dft.'s answer and jury demand to pltf. on 7/24/90. (dktclk) (Entered: 07/27/1990)

PACER
23 July 31, 1990

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff Paul A Wright in support of motion for appointment of counsel [22-1] (dktclk) (Entered: 08/07/1990)

PACER
24 July 31, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of SERVICE of pltf.'s motion for appt. of cnsl. to Atty. General by mail on 7/23/90 (dktclk) (Entered: 08/07/1990)

PACER
25 Aug. 15, 1990

ORDER by Magistrate John L. Weinberg ; discovery to be completed by 10/15/90; any pretrial motions and supporting briefs will be filed and served on or before 11/15/90 , pltf. pretrial statement shall be filed on or before 12/15/90; dft. shall file ans serve a similar statement on or before 1/15/91. (cc: all counsel, pltf.) (dktclk) (Entered: 08/17/1990)

PACER
26 Aug. 28, 1990

MOTION by plaintiff Paul A Wright to strike pretrial preparations deadline assigned to Magistrate John L. Weinberg noted for 9/14/90 (dktclk) (Entered: 08/31/1990)

PACER
27 Sept. 7, 1990

ORDER by Magistrate John L. Weinberg DENYING pltf.'s motion for appointment of counsel [22-1] (cc: all counsel, pltf., JLW ) (dktclk) (Entered: 09/10/1990)

PACER
28 Sept. 11, 1990

RESPONSE by defendant to motion to strike pretrial preparations deadline [26-1] (dktclk) (Entered: 09/14/1990)

PACER
29 Sept. 21, 1990

MOTION by defendant for protective order noted for 10/12/90 (dktclk) (Entered: 09/25/1990)

PACER
30 Sept. 21, 1990

MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of motion for protective order [29-1] (dktclk) (Entered: 09/25/1990)

PACER
31 Sept. 21, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of SERVICE by Atty. General of motion for protective order etc. on pltf. by mail 9/20/90. (dktclk) (Entered: 09/25/1990)

PACER
32 Sept. 27, 1990

MOTION by plaintiff to compel noted for 10/19/90 (RS) (Entered: 10/01/1990)

PACER
33 Sept. 27, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion to compel [32-1] (RS) (Entered: 10/01/1990)

PACER
34 Oct. 4, 1990

MOTION by defendants for leave to file overlength brief (memo in support of mtn for summ jgm) noted for 10/19/90 (RS) (Entered: 10/05/1990)

PACER
35 Oct. 4, 1990

MOTION by defendants for summary judgment noted for 10/26/90. Incorrectly noted-phoned cnsl (RS) (Entered: 10/05/1990)

PACER
37 Oct. 4, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion for leave to file overlength brief (memo in support of mtn for summ jgm) [34-1], etc (RS) (Entered: 10/05/1990)

PACER
Oct. 4, 1990

LODGED ORDER: to shorten time (RS) (Entered: 10/05/1990)

PACER
Oct. 4, 1990

LODGED ORDER: re: motion for leave to file overlength brief (memo in support of mtn for summ jgm) (RS) (Entered: 10/05/1990)

PACER
Oct. 4, 1990

PROPOSED dfts' memo in support of mtn for summary judgment (RS) (Entered: 10/05/1990)

PACER
38 Oct. 5, 1990

MOTION by plaintiff to strike dfts' summary judgment motion noted for 10/26/90. Incorrectly noted-letter sent (RS) (Entered: 10/12/1990)

PACER
39 Oct. 5, 1990

RESPONSE by plaintiff to motion to shorten time motion for leave to file overlength brief (memo in support of mtn for summ jgm) [34-1] [36-1] (RS) (Entered: 10/12/1990)

PACER
40 Oct. 5, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service by mail regarding motion to strike dfts' summary judgment motion [38-1] (RS) (Entered: 10/12/1990)

PACER
41 Oct. 6, 1990

LETTER from atty general confirming motion for summ jgm to be noted for 10/26/90 with motion to shorten time noted for 10/8/90 (RS) (Entered: 10/15/1990)

PACER
42 Oct. 6, 1990

RESPONSE by plaintiff to motion for protective order [29-1] (RS) (Entered: 10/15/1990)

PACER
43 Oct. 6, 1990

STIPULATION of facts (RS) (Entered: 10/15/1990)

PACER
44 Oct. 6, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding stipulation [43-1] (RS) (Entered: 10/15/1990)

PACER
46 Oct. 12, 1990

MOTION by plaintiff to compel production of interrogatories noted for 11/2/90. Incorrectly noted-letter sent (RS) (Entered: 10/18/1990)

PACER
47 Oct. 12, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service by mail regarding motion to compel production of interrogatories [46-1] (RS) (Entered: 10/18/1990)

PACER
45 Oct. 15, 1990

MINUTE ORDER: by JLW granting dft's motion to shorten time motion for leave to file overlength brief (memo in support of mtn for summ jgm) [34-1] [36-1], motion for summary judgment [35-1] noted for 10/26/90, and granting dft's motion for leave to file overlength brief (memo in support of mtn for summ jgm) [34-1] (cc: all counsel) (RS) (Entered: 10/16/1990)

PACER
119 Oct. 15, 1990

MEMORANDUM by defendants in support of motion for summary judgment [35-1] (overlength) (RS) (Entered: 08/14/1991)

PACER
48 Oct. 24, 1990

SUPPLEMENT by plaintiff re motion to strike dfts' summary judgment motion [38-1] (RS) (Entered: 10/25/1990)

PACER
49 Oct. 25, 1990

RESPONSE by defendant to motion to compel production of interrogatories [46-1] (RS) (Entered: 10/30/1990)

PACER
50 Oct. 31, 1990

RESPONSE by plaintiff to motion to compel production of interrogatories [46-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/02/1990)

PACER
51 Oct. 31, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion response [50-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/02/1990)

PACER
52 Nov. 1, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of Veronica Rebeiro in support of dfts' motion for summ jgm (RS) (Entered: 11/06/1990)

PACER
53 Nov. 1, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of Kenneth DuCharme regarding motion for summary judgment [35-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/06/1990)

PACER
54 Nov. 1, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of James Evans regarding motion for summary judgment [35-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/06/1990)

PACER
55 Nov. 1, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of Howard Anderson regarding motion for summary judgment [35-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/06/1990)

PACER
56 Nov. 1, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding affidavits in support of summ jgm motion [52-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/06/1990)

PACER
57 Nov. 2, 1990

SECOND RESPONSE by defendant to motion to compel production of interrogatories [46-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/06/1990)

PACER
58 Nov. 2, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of serivce regarding motion response [57-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/06/1990)

PACER
59 Nov. 7, 1990

REPLY by plaintiff to dfts' 2nd RESPONSE to motion to compel production of interrogatories [46-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/13/1990)

PACER
60 Nov. 7, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion reply [59-1] (RS) (Entered: 11/13/1990)

PACER
61 Nov. 29, 1990

SECOND SUPPLEMENT by plaintiff re motion to strike dfts' summary judgment motion [38-1] (RS) (Entered: 12/04/1990)

PACER
62 Nov. 29, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding supplement to motion [61-1] (RS) (Entered: 12/04/1990)

PACER
63 Dec. 5, 1990

RESPONSE by defendants to pltf's second supplement to pltf's motion to strike dfts' motion for summ jgm (RS) (Entered: 12/07/1990)

PACER
64 Dec. 5, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of Therese M. Wheaton (RS) (Entered: 12/07/1990)

PACER
65 Dec. 5, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service re dfts' response to pltf's supplement (RS) (Entered: 12/07/1990)

PACER
66 Dec. 7, 1990

REPLY by plaintiff to dfts' response to second supplement to strike dfts' motion for summ jgm (RS) (Entered: 12/11/1990)

PACER
67 Dec. 7, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service by pltf regarding reply [66-1] (RS) (Entered: 12/11/1990)

PACER
69 Dec. 14, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding supplement to motion [68-1] (RS) (Entered: 01/02/1991)

PACER
68 Dec. 24, 1990

SUPPLEMENT to pltf's motion to compel by plaintiff (RS) (Entered: 01/02/1991)

PACER
70 Dec. 28, 1990

MOTION by plaintiff to compel interrogatories of dfts Evans, Anderson and DuCharme noted for 1/11/91 (RS) (Entered: 01/03/1991)

PACER
71 Dec. 28, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of Paul A. Wright (RS) (Entered: 01/03/1991)

PACER
72 Dec. 28, 1990

AFFIDAVIT of service re motion to compel interrogatories, etc (RS) (Entered: 01/03/1991)

PACER
73 Jan. 2, 1991

RESPONSE by defendant to motion to compel interrogatories of dfts Evans, Anderson and DuCharme [70-1] (RS) (Entered: 01/04/1991)

PACER
74 Jan. 2, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion response [73-1] (RS) (Entered: 01/04/1991)

PACER
78 Jan. 7, 1991

PRAECIPE: by plaintiff to file attached exhibits to pltf's motion to compel response to interrogatories for dfts Anderson, DuCharme and Evans (RS) (Entered: 01/16/1991)

PACER
75 Jan. 8, 1991

REPLY by plaintiff Paul A Wright TO defendant's RESPONSE to motion to compel interrogatories of dfts Evans, Anderson and DuCharme [70-1] (dktclk) (Entered: 01/11/1991)

PACER
76 Jan. 8, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion reply [75-1] (dktclk) (Entered: 01/11/1991)

PACER
77 Jan. 9, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service by dft re afdt and correction sheet to depo of Kincheloe (RS) (Entered: 01/15/1991)

PACER
79 Jan. 14, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service by atty general re affidavit and correction sheet re depo of Kenneth DuCharme (RS) (Entered: 01/17/1991)

PACER
80 Jan. 24, 1991

ORDER by Magistrate John L. Weinberg regarding pending mtns: pltf's mtn to strike dfts' mtn for summ jgm is DENIED; pltf's mtns to compel are DENIED without prejudice; dfts' mtn for protective order is DENIED without prejudice; pltf's mtn to strike pretrial ddl is GRANTED; dft's mtn for summ jgm is STAYED, the court will renote the motion at the appropriate time; and all discovery is STAYED, except that specified in this order. (cc: all counsel,BJR,JLW) (RS) (Entered: 01/24/1991)

PACER
81 Feb. 15, 1991

MOTION by plaintiff to permit discovery relevant to summ jgm noted for 3/8/91 (RS) (Entered: 02/20/1991)

PACER
82 Feb. 15, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion to permit discovery relevant to summ jgm [81-1] (RS) (Entered: 02/20/1991)

PACER
83 March 15, 1991

RESPONSE by defendant to motion to permit discovery relevant to summ jgm [81-1] (SH) (Entered: 03/20/1991)

PACER
84 March 29, 1991

REPLY by plaintiff TO RESPONSE to motion to permit discovery relevant to summ jgm [81-1] (RS) (Entered: 04/02/1991)

PACER
85 March 29, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion reply [84-1] (RS) (Entered: 04/02/1991)

PACER
87 April 24, 1991

MOTION by plaintiff to stay pending appeal noted for 5/10/91 (RS) (Entered: 04/25/1991)

PACER
88 April 24, 1991

MOTION by plaintiff to shorten time on [88-1], motion to stay pending appeal [87-1] noted for 4/26/91 (RS) (Entered: 04/25/1991)

PACER
89 April 24, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion to stay pending appeal [87-1] (RS) (Entered: 04/25/1991)

PACER
91 April 27, 1991

MOTION by plaintiff to extend time to appeal JLW order noted for 5/17/91 (RS) (Entered: 05/06/1991)

PACER
90 April 29, 1991

MINUTE ORDER: by JLW GRANTING pltf's motion to shorten time on [88-1], motion to stay pending appeal [87-1] [88-1]and DENYING motion to stay pending appeal [87-1] (cc: all counsel) (RS) (Entered: 04/29/1991)

PACER
93 May 2, 1991

RESPONSE by defendants to pltf's mtn to shorten time and objection to stay (RS) (Entered: 05/07/1991)

PACER
94 May 2, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service regarding motion response [93-1] (RS) (Entered: 05/07/1991)

PACER
92 May 6, 1991

MOTION by plaintiff to shorten time on [92-1], motion to extend time to appeal JLW order [91-1] noted for 5/3/91. Incorrectly noted. (RS) (Entered: 05/07/1991)

PACER
96 May 9, 1991

REPLY by plaintiff TO RESPONSE to motion to shorten time and stay (RS) (Entered: 05/14/1991)

PACER
97 May 9, 1991

AFFIDAVIT of service re pltf's reply to mtn to shorten time (RS) (Entered: 05/14/1991)

PACER
95 May 13, 1991

ORDER by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein GRANTING pltf's mtn to shorten time; DENYING pltf's motion to extend time to appeal JLW order [91- 1]; and RENOTING dft's motion for summary judgment [35-1] to 5/31/91 (cc: all counsel) (RS) (Entered: 05/13/1991)

PACER
98 May 29, 1991

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file in reply to dfts' motion for summ jgm noted for 6/14/91. Incorrectly noted-letter sent (RS) (Entered: 06/03/1991)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Washington

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 19, 1990

Closing Date: 1997

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

prisoners of the Washington State Reformatory

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

Washington State Reformatory

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Western District of Washington 2:90-cv-00396

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 91-36087

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 1986 - 1997

Issues

General/Misc.:

Conditions of confinement

Disciplinary procedures

Sanitation / living conditions

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Administrative segregation

Recommended Citation