Case: Handberry v. Thompson

1:96-cv-06161 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: Aug. 14, 1996

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a class-action lawsuit brought by eleven school-age incarcerated individuals in the custody of the New York City Department of Correction ("DOC") claiming violation of federal and state laws in the failure to provide them with adequate general and special education services. On August 14, 1996, inmates between the ages of 16 and 21 held in DOC custody who had not earned a high school diploma filed this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The ca…

This is a class-action lawsuit brought by eleven school-age incarcerated individuals in the custody of the New York City Department of Correction ("DOC") claiming violation of federal and state laws in the failure to provide them with adequate general and special education services.
 
On August 14, 1996, inmates between the ages of 16 and 21 held in DOC custody who had not earned a high school diploma filed this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case was assigned toDistrict Judge Kimba M. Wood, with the matter referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV for general pretrial supervision. The plaintiffs, represented by the Legal Aid Society, sued the City of New York, DOC, the Board of Education, later renamed the Department of Education ("DOE"), and various city officials (collectively, the "City defendants"), as well as the Commissioner of the New York State Education Department, alleging that fewer than half of school-eligible DOC inmates received legally mandated educational services and that inmates with disabilities were denied special education services. Plaintiffs brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq., section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and New York constitutional, statutory, and regulatory education law. They sought declaratory and injunctive relief requiring defendants to provide all mandated educational services to eligible inmates. The parties stipulated to provisional class certification, which Judge Wood confirmed by order on November 20, 1996.
 
Judge Wood denied the Commissioner's motion to dismiss on May 28, 1997 and the City defendants' motion for partial summary judgment and declaratory judgment on plaintiffs' claims under the IDEA on June 10, 1998. The case proceeded to discovery and was reassigned to District Judge Constance Baker Motley on August 26, 1999. Judge Motley heard oral argument on plaintiffs' motion for declaratory judgment on January 7, 2000. On March 13, 2000, the court granted the motion, finding uncontradicted evidence that many class members received no general education services for significant periods, that hundreds of inmates in special housing units received no schooling at all, and that a substantial portion of the class with learning disabilities received no special education services. The court rejected the City defendants' arguments that the case was moot, that abstention was warranted, and that plaintiffs had failed to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), and ordered the City defendants to submit a plan for providing full and complete educational services to eligible inmates on Rikers Island. 92 F.Supp.2d 244.
 
The City defendants submitted an Education Plan in April 2000, which the court adopted only reluctantly on June 29, 2000, finding it deficient in many respects. On September 19, 2000, the court appointed Dr. Sheri Meisel to monitor its implementation for one year. After Dr. Meisel's Final Report, submitted in December 2001, found continued noncompliance, the court held a hearing on the parties' cross-applications to amend the Education Plan. On August 29, 2002, Judge Motley issued an opinion and accompanying order finding the City defendants had failed to meet their obligations regarding notification of services, escorts and security, minimum instructional time, teacher certification, library services, and numerous IDEA requirements including screening, development of Individualized Education Plans, related services, and transition planning. The court entered a detailed forty-seven-paragraph injunction amending the Education Plan and reappointing Dr. Meisel as monitor. 219 F.Supp.2d 525. The City defendants appealed and moved for a partial stay, which the court denied on September 19, 2002.
 
On November 27, 2002, the Second Circuit vacated the injunction and remanded for the district court to consider whether the Supreme Court's intervening decision in Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516 (2002), required plaintiffs to exhaust administrative remedies under the PLRA. On January 28, 2003, Judge Motley held that Porter did not require exhaustion, finding both that no administrative remedy was available to address DOC's and DOE's systemic failure to provide education and that the City defendants had waived any exhaustion defense by previously representing that no such remedy existed, and reinstated the August 2002 injunction. 2003 WL 194205. The City defendants again appealed on February 5, 2003, and plaintiffs cross-appealed. On April 4, 2003, the court granted the City defendants' motion for a partial stay pending appeal as to specific provisions of the injunction concerning library services, support team meetings, and cell study, while denying the City's request to modify the monitor provision. 2003 WL 1797850. The case was reassigned to District Judge Deborah A. Batts on October 7, 2005, and following her recusal, to District Judge George B. Daniels on February 16, 2007.
 
On January 17, 2006, the Second Circuit affirmed in part and vacated in part. The court held that the City defendants had waived any PLRA exhaustion defense and that IDEA exhaustion was excused as futile given the systemic nature of the claims. Applying the PLRA's requirement that prospective relief be narrowly drawn and necessary to correct a federal right, the court held that the district court lacked authority to order relief based solely on state law and vacated numerous injunction paragraphs on that ground, while affirming provisions grounded in the IDEA and in the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. The court remanded nine additional paragraphs for the district court to determine whether they were based on state or federal law. 436 F.3d 52. On rehearing, the court additionally vacated two paragraphs requiring inmates to meet with a school-based support team within five days of referral. 446 F.3d 335.
 
Proceedings continued on remand. The parties attempted to settle the action, and plaintiffs proposed an amended injunction. The case was largely inactive for several years. On June 10, 2014, the court appointed Dr. Peter E. Leone as Special Master to assess the current state of educational services. Based on Dr. Leone's findings, Magistrate Judge Francis on December 2, 2015, recommended entering a substantially narrowed amended injunction limited to six substantive requirements: a minimum of three hours of daily educational services; equal entitlement to services for inmates in restricted housing; application of the order to all DOE schools and programs within DOC facilities; provision of escorts to ensure timely access to instruction; continued provision of special education services, including in restricted housing; and reappointment of Dr. Leone as monitor for a two-year term. 2015 WL 10570793. Judge Daniels adopted this recommendation and entered the amended injunction on March 31, 2016. 2016 WL 1268265. 
 
After Dr. Leone submitted further semi-annual reports under the 2016 order, the City defendants moved on September 28,2018 to partially terminate the injunction as to both adolescent and adult inmates; plaintiffs opposed and obtained a postponement of the PLRA's automatic stay based on New York's "Raise the Age" law, which transferred sixteen- and seventeen-year-old inmates off Rikers Island to a new facility. The City defendants withdrew their termination motion and instead sought confirmation of Dr. Leone's factual findings of substantial or partial compliance across the injunction's paragraphs. On September 27, 2019, Judge Daniels granted the City defendants' motion to overrule plaintiffs' objections to Dr. Leone's Second and Third Reports and adopted Dr. Leone's uncontroverted factual findings, while declining to adopt his legal conclusions regarding compliance and denying without prejudice plaintiffs' request to reappoint Dr. Leone given intervening changes in circumstances.
 
On June 3, 2024, the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger for general pretrial management and settlement, and the parties have since engaged in extensive discovery disputes and settlement negotiations. As of August 2026, the case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Hannah Grosserichter (8/11/2026)

Angela Heverling (1/30/2006)

Abigail DeHart (10/27/2016)

Raul Noguera-McElroy (4/19/2019)

Ben Hefter (10/10/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4685569/parties/handberry-v-thompson/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Anger, Tyler Alex (New York)

Banks, Steven (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Anderson, Belina (New York)

Benjamin, Moshe (New York)

Birnbaum, Janice L. (New York)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:96-cv-06161

Civil Docket for Case #: 1:98-cv-04413

Aug. 26, 2020

Aug. 26, 2020

Docket
81

1:96-cv-06161

Opinion Granting Declaratory Judgment

March 13, 2000

March 13, 2000

Order/Opinion

92 F.Supp.2d 244

124

1:96-cv-06161

Opinion on the Party's Cross-Applications to Amend the Education Plan

Aug. 28, 2002

Aug. 28, 2002

Order/Opinion

219 F.Supp.2d 525

144

1:96-cv-06161

Opinion

Jan. 28, 2003

Jan. 28, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 194205

152

1:96-cv-06161

Memorandum Opinion & Order

April 4, 2003

April 4, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 1797850

03-00047

03-00065

Appellate Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Jan. 17, 2006

Jan. 17, 2006

Order/Opinion

436 F.3d 52

230

1:96-cv-06161

Report and Recommendation

Handberry et al. v. Thompson, Jr. et al.

Dec. 2, 2015

Dec. 2, 2015

Order/Opinion

2015 WL 10570793

251

1:96-cv-06161

Memorandum and Order

Handberry et al. v. Thompson, Jr. et al.

March 31, 2016

March 31, 2016

Order/Opinion

2016 WL 1268265

304

1:96-cv-06161

Memorandum Decision and Order

Handberry et al. v. Thompson, Jr. et al.

Sept. 27, 2019

Sept. 27, 2019

Order/Opinion

2019 WL 5203666

Resources

Resources related to this case
Title Description External URL Date / External URL

Oral History Project Interview with Attorney John Boston: Contents and Links

Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Contents: Clearinghouse Oral History Project Interview with Attorney John Boston (Spring 2023)
[
00:00-20:36] Early Lif…
April 2023

April 7, 2023

https://www.mivideo.it.umich.edu/...

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4685569/handberry-v-thompson/

Last updated Aug. 10, 2026, 5:42 p.m.

Docket for: Handberry v. Thompson
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 14, 1996

COMPLAINT filed; Summons issued and Notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c); FILING FEE $ 120.00 RECEIPT # 268801 (ricm) (Entered: 08/15/1996)

RECAP
Aug. 14, 1996

Magistrate Judge Francis is so Designated. (ricm)

2 Aug. 20, 1996

Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Gen. Pretrial/Including Initial Case Managment Conference....Dispositive Motion ( signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood ) Referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV (kg) (Entered: 08/20/1996)

RECAP
3 Sept. 4, 1996

RETURN OF SERVICE executed as to The City of New York by personal service, leaving with the NYC Dept. of Law on 8/21/96. Answer due on 9/10/96 for The City of New York (lam) (Entered: 09/06/1996)

RECAP
4 Sept. 11, 1996

Filed Memo_Endorsement on letter to Judge Wood from Dori A. Lewis dated 09/03/96, .. requests that Your Honor waive the requirement in your court rules that a conference among the parties be held before any motion can be filed and instead grant us permission to file our class certification motion without delay. PERMISSION TO MOVE FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION WITHOUT A PREMOTION CONFERENCE IS GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood) (djc) (Entered: 09/11/1996)

RECAP
5 Sept. 17, 1996

Filed Memo-Endorsement on letter to Judge Wood from Stephen Jacoby, Asst. Atty General dated 9/16/96, requesting an extension of the time for deft Commissioner Mills to move or answer ....THE DEADLINE FOR DEFT MILLS TO ANSWER OR MOVE IS HELD IN ABEYANCE PENDING THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE SCHEDULED PROMPTLY. SO ORDERED 9/17/96. MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRANCIS ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ) (lam) (Entered: 09/18/1996)

RECAP
6 Sept. 24, 1996

ORDER, Plaintiffs' counsel shall draft and circulate a stipulation providing for provisional class certification. Set defendant Mills' motion to dismiss to filing deadline for 10/21/96. Plaintiffs shall answer the motion by 11/11/96. Defendant Mills shall reply by 11/25/96, Set discovery due for 4/30/97, Set pretrial order due for 5/30/97. SO ORDERED: ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ) (ae) (Entered: 09/25/1996)

RECAP
7 Sept. 25, 1996

ORDER, for Moshe Benjamin to appear pro hac vice upon condition that he make formal application for admission pursuant to General Rule 2 of the local rules within 30 days. ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ); (ae) (Entered: 09/25/1996)

RECAP
8 Oct. 21, 1996

NOTICE OF MOTION by Richard Mills to dismiss the complaint, Return date 12/16/96; attached are papers in support (cd) (Entered: 10/22/1996)

RECAP
9 Oct. 21, 1996

MEMORANDUM by Richard Mills in support of [8-1] motion to dismiss the complaint (cd) (Entered: 10/22/1996)

RECAP
10 Oct. 22, 1996

ANSWER to Complaint by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York (Attorney Georgia Pestana) (kw) (Entered: 10/23/1996)

RECAP
11 Nov. 8, 1996

MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Wager in opposition to Dismiss. (djc) (Entered: 11/12/1996)

RECAP
12 Nov. 8, 1996

DECLARATION of Marta E. Nelson (djc) (Entered: 11/12/1996)

RECAP
13 Nov. 12, 1996

MEMORANDUM OF LAW by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York in opposition to [8-1] motion to dismiss the complaint (djc) (Entered: 11/14/1996)

RECAP
14 Nov. 20, 1996

STIPULATION and ORDERFOR PROVISIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE TO THE CLASS, This action is provisionally certified as a class action for the pltff. class, purs. to F.R.C.P. 23(a) and (b)(2), subject to the following two provisions... see doc. ...SO ORDERED... ( signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood ). (ls) (Entered: 11/21/1996)

RECAP
15 Nov. 26, 1996

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT by Richard Mills re: [8-1] motion to dismiss the complaint (djc) (Entered: 11/29/1996)

RECAP
16 Dec. 10, 1996

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV Re: [8-1] motion to dismiss the complaint ; ...FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH AVOVE, I RECOMMEND THAT COMMISSIONER MILLS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLT. BE DENIED. PURS. TO RULE 72 OF THE FRCP, THE PARTIES SHALL HAVE TEN (10) DAYS TO FILE WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.... Objections to R and R due by 12/24/96 (ls) (Entered: 12/11/1996)

RECAP
17 Dec. 18, 1996

Filed Memo_Endorsement on letter from Dori A. Lewis dated 12/16/96, I respectfully ask that the scheduled prescribed by Rule 72 be extended. Since I will be out of the country, I agree to an extension of objections until my return on 1/13/97, and ask that I be given until 1/27/97, to respond to any objections fld. by the State deft. ...SO ORDERED... ( signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood ) (ls) (Entered: 12/18/1996)

RECAP
18 April 14, 1997

Filed Memo_Endorsement on letter dated 4/10/97, pretrial order due for 11/28/97, dispositive motion filing deadline for 11/28/97 ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ) (cd) (Entered: 04/15/1997)

RECAP
19 May 28, 1997

ORDER denying [8-1] motion to dismiss the complaint. ( signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood ); Copies mailed (ae) (Entered: 05/29/1997)

RECAP
20 June 6, 1997

ANSWER to Complaint by Richard Mills (Attorney Moshe Benjamin),; jury demand; Firm of: Attny. Gen. of the State of NY by attorney Moshe Benjamin for defendant Richard Mills (ls) (Entered: 06/10/1997)

RECAP
21 Dec. 4, 1997

ORDER; reset any motion by defts addressing the impact of amendments to IDEA filing deadline for 1/9/98 ; pltff shall answer the motion by 2/6/98, and defts shall submit any reply by 2/13/98 ; reset all discovery due for 6/30/98 ; reset the pretrial order due for 7/31/98, unless any dispositive motion is fld. by that date; if such a motion is fld., the pretrial order shall be due thirty days after the motion is decided ; ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV Copies mailed (ls) (Entered: 12/05/1997)

RECAP
22 Jan. 21, 1998

NOTICE OF MOTION by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York; pursuant to Rule 56 of the FRCP, for partial summary judgment ; pursuant to Rule 57 of the FRCP, for declaratory judgment on plaintiffs' claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ; with Civil Rule 56.1 Statement and Declaration(s) in support attached.. (ae) (Entered: 01/23/1998)

RECAP
23 Jan. 21, 1998

MEMORANDUM OF LAW by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York in support of [22-1] pursuant to Rule 56 of the FRCP, for partial summary judgment; [22-2] motion pursuant to Rule 57 of the FRCP, for declaratory judgment on plaintiffs' claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (ae) (Entered: 01/23/1998)

RECAP
24 Feb. 6, 1998

MEMORANDUM by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager in opposition to [22-1] motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the FRCP, for partial summary judgment, [22-2] motion pursuant to Rule 57 of the FRCP, for declaratory judgment on plaintiffs' claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (cd) (Entered: 02/09/1998)

RECAP
25 Feb. 6, 1998

DECLARATION in opposition by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager [22-1] motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the FRCP, for partial summary judgment, [22-2] motion pursuant to Rule 57 of the FRCP, for declaratory judgment on plaintiffs' claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (cd) (Entered: 02/09/1998)

RECAP
27 Feb. 13, 1998

Amended Rule 56.1 Statement filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager (ls) (Entered: 02/18/1998)

RECAP
26 Feb. 17, 1998

Filed Memo-Endorsement on letter dated 2/12/98 from Georgia Pestana, granting Municipal Defendants' request for an extension until 2/17/98 to serve their reply to plaintiffs' opposition to their motion for partial summary judgment ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ) (kw) Modified on 02/19/1998 (Entered: 02/18/1998)

RECAP
28 Feb. 18, 1998

REPLY MEMORANDUM by The City of New York in support of re: [22-1] motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the FRCP, for partial summary judgment. (kw) (Entered: 02/20/1998)

RECAP
29 April 22, 1998

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; of Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV Re: [22-1] motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the FRCP, for partial summary judgment, [22-2] motion pursuant to Rule 57 of the FRCP, for declaratory judgment on plaintiffs' claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act; I recommend that the City defts' motion for summary jdgmt. as to the applicability of the IDEA be denied, that the motion for partial summary jdgmt. relating to the amendments to the IDEA be denied w/o prejudice to renew following submission of an amended complt. by the pltffs, and that declaratory relief be denied; Objections to R and R due by 5/6/98 (ls) (Entered: 04/23/1998)

RECAP
30 May 12, 1998

Filed Memo Endorsement on letter to Judge Francis from Dori Lewis and Heidi Grossman, dated 5/7/98, reset discovery due for 12/15/98 ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ) (cd) (Entered: 05/13/1998)

RECAP
31 June 10, 1998

ORDER denying [22-1] motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the FRCP, for partial summary judgment; denying [22-2] motion pursuant to Rule 57 of the FRCP, for declaratory judgment on plaintiffs' claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the City defts' other motion for partial summary judgment is dismissed without prejudice. The parties are directed to contact Mag. Judge Francis's Chambers to schedule further proceedings in this matter ( signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood ); Copies mailed (cd) (Entered: 06/12/1998)

RECAP
32 Sept. 29, 1998

NOTICE of change of address by Carlos Rivera (jp) (Entered: 09/29/1998)

RECAP
33 March 22, 1999

ORDER, by April 9, 1999, the City defendants shall complete their responses to all outstanding discovery requests and shall submit a privilege log. By April 23, 1999, plaintiffs shall submit their revised discovery responses ; set plaintiff's motion to compel filing deadline for 4/23/99 ; set all fact discovery due for 7/31/99 ; Any tours of correctional facilities by plaintiffs' experts shall be completed by October 15, 1999. Plaintiffs shall submit expert reports by October 29, 1999 Defendants shall submit expert reports by November 12, 1999. All expert discovery shall be completed by November 30, 1999. The pretrial order shall be submitted by December 31, 1999 unless any dispositive motion is filed by that date. If such a motion is filed, the pretrial order shall be due thirty days after the motion is decided. (signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV); Copies mailed (djc) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

RECAP
March 22, 1999

Pre-trial conference held before Mag. Judge Francis. (emil)

34 April 22, 1999

Filed Memo-Endorsement on letter to Mag Judge Francis from Dori Lewis and Janice Birnbaum, dated 4/20/99, motion filing deadline set for 4/30/99 with respect to plntfs motions to compel outstanding discovery (signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV). (cd) Modified on 04/23/1999 (Entered: 04/22/1999)

RECAP
35 May 11, 1999

Filed Memo-Endorsement on letter by Janice L. Birnbaum to Magistrate Judge Francis dated 5/11/99; granting the parties request that the City Defendant shall submit their opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery and for a protective order on or before 5/13/99, and that plaintiffs shall submit their reply 4 business days later ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ) (pl) (Entered: 05/12/1999)

RECAP
36 May 14, 1999

Filed Memo-Endorsement on letter to Mag. Judge Francis from Janice L. Birnbaum dated 5/13/99; granting counsel for City defts request for a 1-day extension of the submission date for the City Defts opposition to pltff's pending application to compel discovery and for a protective order, and for the submission of pltff's reply papers as follows: ; the City Defts will submit their opposition to pltffs' motion on or before 5/14/99, and pltffs will submit their reply 4 business days later ; ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV) (ls) (Entered: 05/17/1999)

RECAP
37 May 24, 1999

Letter filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager dated 5/20/99 re in response to the letter submitted by the City defendants' dated 5/14/99. (ri) (Entered: 05/25/1999)

RECAP
38 May 24, 1999

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault (af) (Entered: 05/26/1999)

RECAP
39 July 6, 1999

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault (kb) (Entered: 07/06/1999)

RECAP
40 July 6, 1999

Memo endorsed on pltffs' request to file document under seal; Application granted ; ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ); Copies mailed. (ls) (Entered: 07/06/1999)

RECAP
41 July 6, 1999

ORDER; with respect to plans for program or policy changes that have not yet been implemented, the City defts' assertion of the privilege is upheld; until a change is implemented the City defts have no argument that pltffs' request for injunctive relief is moot, and it would therefore be premature to breach the privilege. By 7/6/99, the City defts shall submit for my in camera inspection the documents as to which they assert the atty-client privilege and which are listed in Exhibit A to the letter of Dori A. Lewis and Mary Lynne Werlwas dated 4/30/99. By 7/6/99, the City defts shall submit a formal response to the five documents requests idenified on page 2 of the letter of Dori A. Lewis and Mary Lynne Werlwas dated 5/20/99 ; by 7/30/99, the City defts shall produce the requested correctional and educational records for the members of the pltff class, including blind and deaf inmates, as well as the requested housing plans, subject to the protective order agreed to by the parties ; 30-days prior to the close of fact discovery, the City defts shall make a final designation of those witnesses who will actually testify at trial. The Court will not impose any arbitrary limitation on the duration of depositions in this case. However, if any deposition is unjustifiably prolonged, the party defending the deposition may seek an order requiring the shifting of costs, including attys' fees ; the deadline for completion of fact discovery is extended to 10/15/99. ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ); Copies mailed. (sac) (Entered: 07/06/1999)

RECAP
42 July 6, 1999

Filed Memo-Endorsement on letter addressed to Judge Francis from Blanch Greenfield, dated 7/6/99, granting defendants request for an enlargement of time, until 7/9/99, for the City defendants to produce to the Court certain documents for in camera inspection (signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV); copies mailed. (ri) (Entered: 07/07/1999)

RECAP
43 July 6, 1999

Letter filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager addressed to Mag. Judge Francis from Dori A. Lewis, Mary Lynne Werlwas, dated 5/20/99, re: pltffs submit this letter in response to the letter submitted by the City Defts' dtd. 5/14/99 (ls) (Entered: 07/07/1999)

RECAP
44 July 6, 1999

Letter filed by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York addressed to Mag. Judge Francis from Janice L. Birnbaum, dated 5/14/99, re: the City defts request entry of an order that limits ea. deposition to one 7-hour day; counsel also writes to respond to pltffs' letter dtd. 4/30/99. (ls) (Entered: 07/07/1999)

RECAP
45 July 6, 1999

Letter filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager addressed to Mag. Judge Francis IV from Dori A. Lewis, Mary Lynne Werlwas, dated 4/30/99, re: pltffs seek an order compelling City defts to respond to discovery requests and to provide answers to deposition questions; the pltffs request a conference before the Court to resolve these issues (ls) (Entered: 07/07/1999)

RECAP
46 July 20, 1999

ORDER, regarding resolution of certain documants for in camera review submitted by the City defendants (signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV); Copies mailed. (djc) Modified on 07/23/1999 (Entered: 07/21/1999)

RECAP
47 July 27, 1999

STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER, regarding procedures that will govern the handling of "Covered Documents" ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ). (cd) Modified on 07/30/1999 (Entered: 07/28/1999)

RECAP
48 July 27, 1999

STIPULATION and ORDER, defendants Board of Education of the City of NY and City of NY shall provide counsel for plaintiffs and defendant Mills with the educational records of members of the plaintiff class who are under 18 at the time they signed releases for such records. The records shall be produced two weeks from the date of mailing of the notice to parents or guardians set forth in this stip and order. Counsel for the City defendants shall send via first class mail copies of the notice annexed hereto. Plaintiffs' counsel shall provide the City defendants' counsel with a complete copy of any written communications received concerning the education records. All verbal inquiries shall be responded to by joint conference call including counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for City defendants. ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ). (djc) Modified on 07/29/1999 (Entered: 07/28/1999)

RECAP
49 Aug. 25, 1999

Filed Memo-Endorsement on letter addressed to Mag. Judge Francis from Janice L. Birnbaum, dated 07/27/99, atty for defendants enclose for in camera review copies of the drafts of the Inter-Agency Agreement and related documents. Each of the drafts of the Inter-Agency Agreement and the related documents are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product (signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV); Copies mailed. (djc) Modified on 08/30/1999 (Entered: 08/26/1999)

RECAP
50 Aug. 26, 1999

Notice of reassignment to Judge Constance B. Motley. Copy of notice and judge's rules mailed to Attorney(s) of record: Dori A. Lewis. (em) (Entered: 08/26/1999)

RECAP
51 Aug. 31, 1999

NOTICE of change of address by Carlos Rivera (djc) (Entered: 09/03/1999)

RECAP
Sept. 2, 1999

Received copy of Notice of Re-Assignment which had been sent to Dori A. Lewis, Esq., and returned by the U.S.P.O. stamped: "Returned To Sender, Moved, Not Forwardable". (em)

52 Sept. 9, 1999

Filed Memo-Endorsement on letter addressed to Mag. Judge Francis from Dori A. Lewis, Mary Lynne Werl, dated 9/8/99, re: request that deadlines for both fact and expert discovery be extended for 3 months, respectively. APPLICATION GRANTED. No further extensions . ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ); Copies mailed. (sn) (Entered: 09/10/1999)

RECAP
53 Sept. 10, 1999

ORDER, parties are notified that this matter has been reassignd from the Hon. Kimba M. Wood to the Hon. Constance Baker Motley ; set pre-trial conference for 2:00 p.m. on 10/20/99. The parties should be prepared to argue any outstanding motions (signed by Judge Constance B. Motley); Copies mailed. (djc) Modified on 09/13/1999 (Entered: 09/13/1999)

RECAP
55 Sept. 27, 1999

ORDER; Eugene Bailey, DIN 97 A 1420, an inmate currently incarcerated at Greenhaven Correctional Facility, shall appear in the place designated by the Superintendent of GHCf, so that Mr. Bailey's deposition may be taken at GHCF beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, 10/19/99, and for so long thereafter as the deposition continues, with the continuation date to be agreed to by counsel for all parties and when feasible as soon after the original deposition date as possible ; the superintendent of other official in charge of the current place of incarceration of the inmates listed below, shall produce and transport these inmates from their present place of incarceration to the Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Ossining, New York, so that they may be prepared for and have their depositions taken on the dates listed below, and for so long thereafter as the deposition continues, with the continuation date to be agreed to by counsel for all parties and when feasible as soon after the original depositon date as possible. Each inmate listed in the above paragraph shall appear in the place designated by the Superintendent or other official in charge of the Sing Sing Correctional Facility so that the inmate may be prepared for and have his deposition taken as set forth in this order . ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ); Copies mailed. (pl) (Entered: 09/29/1999)

RECAP
54 Sept. 28, 1999

ORDER, in connection with the inspection of school programs at Rikers Island jail facilities, the City defts shall produce for use only by plntfs' counsel and their experts the class attendance list for each class visited, including the name and inmate number of each student, as further set forth in this document. Counsel may suggest questions to their respective experts ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (cd) (Entered: 09/29/1999)

RECAP
56 Oct. 8, 1999

ORDER the Supt. or other official in charge of the current place of incarceration of the following inmates: Michael Johnson, Lamar Jones, Andres Martinez, Kareem Miller, Austin Nunez, Luis Ortiz, Choice Scott, Melissa Wallace, and Jamel White, shall produce and transport the male inmates from their present place of incarceration to the Sing Sing Correctional Facility and the female inmates from their present place of incarceration to Bedford Hills Correctional Facility so that the inmates may be prepared for and have their depositions taken on the dates set forth in this Order, and for so long thereafter as the deposition continues, with the continuation date to be agreed to by counsel for all parties and when feasible as soon after the original deposition date as possible . ( signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ); Copies mailed. (emil) (Entered: 10/08/1999)

RECAP
57 Oct. 12, 1999

ORDER, at the request of the plaintiff the pre-trial conference scheduled for October 20, 1999 is rescheduled ; The parties are notified that a pre-trial conference in this action is scheduled for 10:30 a.m. on Wednesday, November 17, 1999 in courtroom 26-A in the United States Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street. All parties must arrive prepared for hearing on all pending motions ; (signed by Judge Constance B. Motley); Copies mailed. (djc) Modified on 10/13/1999 (Entered: 10/12/1999)

RECAP
58 Nov. 19, 1999

PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE and ORDER: the next pre-trial conference shall be held in Room 26A on 1/7/00 at 10:00 a.m., at which time the motion will be heard; pltffs are directed to file a motion for declaratory judgment that their rights to education while incarcerated have been violated and for an Order directing defts to file a plan for meeting the educational requirements of pltff on or before 12/1/99; defts will have until 12/15/99 to answer; pltff will have until 12/22/99 to reply. ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (jp) Modified on 11/23/1999 (Entered: 11/22/1999)

RECAP
59 Nov. 23, 1999

ORDER, by order of 11/17/99, pltffs were instructed to file a motion for declaratory judgment by 12/1/99; defts to file an answer by 12/15/99; and pltffs to reply by 12/22/99. The parties joint request to reconsider [58-1] Scheduling order or postpont these filing deadlines is denied . ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (sn) Modified on 11/29/1999 (Entered: 11/29/1999)

RECAP
60 Dec. 3, 1999

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (af) (Entered: 12/03/1999)

RECAP
61 Dec. 3, 1999

Memo-Endorsement on letter addressed to Mag. Judge Francis from Janice L. Birnbaum, dated 11/29/99. Re: the parties jointly request a brief conference before the Court to discuss the timely completion of discovery in light of the briefing schedule and motion pending before Judge Motley. Application denied; The discovery schedule shall be adhered to ; ( by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV ); copies mailed. (ls) (Entered: 12/06/1999)

RECAP
62 Dec. 15, 1999

ORDER, the deft's request to postpone the deadline for the opposition brief to plntfs motion for declaratory judgment until 12/17/99 is granted. The plntf's request to postpone the deadline for filing the reply brief until 1/3/00 is granted. All page limits remain in effect ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (cd) Modified on 12/20/1999 (Entered: 12/16/1999)

RECAP
65 Dec. 18, 1999

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (da) (Entered: 12/28/1999)

RECAP
63 Dec. 22, 1999

NOTICE OF CROSS MOTION by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York; for an order pursuant for summary judgment and dismissing the Complaint ; w/ attch. Rule 56.1stmt., declarations in support by Wagenstein Lisante, Ortiz, Volpini, Ray and Amended Delaration in support by Colon; Return date: 1/7/2000. (pl) (Entered: 12/27/1999)

RECAP
64 Dec. 22, 1999

MEMORANDUM OF LAW by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York in suppoet of re: [63-1] cross motion an order pursuant for summary judgment and dismissing the Complaint and in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for declaratory and parital summary judgment; w/ attch. appendix (pl) Modified on 12/27/1999 (Entered: 12/27/1999)

RECAP
66 Dec. 28, 1999

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (da) (Entered: 12/28/1999)

RECAP
67 Jan. 3, 2000

MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager in opposition to [63-1] cross motion for an order pursuant for summary judgment and dismissing the Complaint; and reply memorandum in support of pltffs' motion for declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment. (Rec'd in N.B. 1/3/00 8:50 PM) (sn) Modified on 01/05/2000 (Entered: 01/05/2000)

RECAP
68 Jan. 3, 2000

ANNOTATED RULE 56.1 STATEMENT in support of motion for delcaratory judgment and partial summary judgment filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager. (Rec'd in N.B. 1/3/00 8:51 PM) (sn) (Entered: 01/05/2000)

RECAP
69 Jan. 3, 2000

RESPONSE to City Defts' Rule 56.1 statement of facts in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager. (Rec'd in N.B. 1/3/00 8:51 PM) (sn) Modified on 01/05/2000 (Entered: 01/05/2000)

RECAP
70 Jan. 11, 2000

ORDER; defts' request to adjourn the conference scheduled for 1/7/00 is denied; all other deadlines remain in effect ; ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); copies mailed (ls) (Entered: 01/11/2000)

RECAP
71 Jan. 13, 2000

SCHEDULE and ORDER: that the next pre-trial conference shall be held in Room 26A on 6/15/00 at 10:00 a.m., at which time all objections to the defts plan will be heard; the motion for a declaratory judgment by pltff in its favor is granted as to all facilities at Riker's Island ; opinion follows, defts will have until 4/14/00 to serve and file a plan for providing full and complete educational facilities and services to all eligible Riker's Island inmates. Pltffs will have until 6/12/00 to file its objections. There will be no extensions of time granted as to the foregoing schedule . ( signed by Judge B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (jp) (Entered: 01/14/2000)

RECAP
72 Jan. 20, 2000

Letter filed by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York addressed to Magistrate Judge Francis from Janice L. Birnbaum in support of their request for an order limiting the tours of pltffs' security and educational experts. (sac) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
73 Jan. 20, 2000

Letter filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager addressed to Magistrate Judge Francis from Dori A. Lewis and Mary Lynne Werlwas, dated 9/27/99; Re: pltffs write to oppose the City defts' motion for a protective order. (sac) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
74 Jan. 20, 2000

Letter filed by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York addressed to Magistrate Judge Francis from Georgia Pestana, dated 12/1/97; Re: counsel writes to present the City defts' position with respect to the proposed invocation of the deliberative process privilege in upcoming depositions. (sac) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
75 Jan. 20, 2000

Letter filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager addressed to Magistrate Judge Francis from Marta Nelson, dated 12/3/97; Re: pltffs write briefly in response to defts' 12/1 letter regarding their assertion of the deliberative process privilege. (sac) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
76 Jan. 20, 2000

Letter filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager addressed to Magistrate Judge Francis from Dori A. Lewis, dated 12/10/99; Re: pltffs submit this letter brief as a motion purs. to FRCP 26 and 27 to compel the City defts to respond to discovery demands. (sac) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
77 Jan. 20, 2000

Letter filed by William C. Thompson Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Richard Mills, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor, Frederick Patrick, Board of Education, The City of New York addressed to Magistrate Judge Francis from Janice L. Birnbaum, dated 1/2/00; Re: this letter is submitted both (a) as a cross-motion to quash the deposition notices for Deputy Warden Rivituso, Deputy Warden Skinner, and Esteban Colon, to set time limits on 31 other noticed depositions of fact witnesses for the City Defts, and to limit the scope of the documents to be produced under the deposition notices directed to the custodians of records at four of DOC jails, and (b) in response to pltffs' letter to Your Honor dated 12/10/99, to compel certain discovery. (sac) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
78 Jan. 20, 2000

Letter filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager addressed to Mag. Judge Francis from Marta Nelson, Dori A. Lewis, dated 11/21/97, re: counsel for pltffs write to apprise the Court of a controversey regarding defts' proposed invocation of the deliberative process privilege to stop certain questions pltffs plan to ask of City policymakers during their upcoming depositions. (sn) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

RECAP
79 Feb. 10, 2000

NOTICE of change of office phone number by Board of Education, The City of New York (pl) (Entered: 02/14/2000)

RECAP
80 March 7, 2000

Transcript of record of proceedings before Judge Constance B. Motley for the date(s) of 1/7/00. (cd) (Entered: 03/07/2000)

RECAP
81 March 13, 2000

OPINION GRANTING DECLARATORY JUDGMENT #83619, for the reasons (outlined within this document) the court granted plntfs' motion for declaratory judgment, establishing the City defts' liability for failure to provide adequate general and special educational services to class members at the facilities on Rikers Island ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (cd) (Entered: 03/14/2000)

Clearinghouse
82 May 3, 2000

Education Plan For The Rikers Island Academies by The City Defts. defts (ls) Modified on 05/08/2000 (Entered: 05/08/2000)

RECAP
83 May 10, 2000

ORDER; pltffs' request to postpone the deadline for their response to defts' remedial plan and the hearing thereon is granted; pltffs' response is due by Friday, 6/23/00 ; the hearing on defts' remedial plan will be held on Wednesday, 6/28/00 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 26A at 500 Pearl Street ; ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (lf) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

RECAP
84 June 14, 2000

NOTICE OF MOTION by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager purs. to FRCP 56 for declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment against defts the City of New York, the Board of Education of the City of New York, William C. Thompson, Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor and Frederick Patrick . Return date 1/7/00. (Originally received in Mag. Judge Francis' chambers in Dec. 1999. Received for docketing on 6/14/00) (emil) (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
85 June 14, 2000

MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager in support of [84-1] motion purs. to FRCP 56 for declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment against defts the City of New York, the Board of Education of the City of New York, William C. Thompson, Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor and Frederick Patrick. (Originally received in Mag. Judge Francis' chambers in Dec. 1999. Received for docketing on 6/14/00) (emil) (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
86 June 14, 2000

RULE 56.1 STATEMENT filed by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager. (Originally received in Mag. Judge Francis' chambers in Dec. 1999. Received for docketing on 6/14/00) (emil) (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
87 June 14, 2000

DECLARATION of Dori A. Lewis by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman, Jose Colon, Irving Nooks, Austin Nunez, Carlos Luscz, Michael Picart, Carlos Rivera, Joseph Valdez, Eugene Bailey, Anthony Wager in support Re: [84-1] motion purs. to FRCP 56 for declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment against defts the City of New York, the Board of Education of the City of New York, William C. Thompson, Jr., Jerry Cammarata, Carol Gresser, Irene Impellizzeri, Sandra Lerner, Luis Reyes, Ninfa Segarra, Rudolph Crew, Michael Jacobson, Eric Taylor and Frederick Patrick. (Originally received in Mag. Judge Francis' chambers in Dec. 1999. Received for docketing on 6/14/00) (emil) (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
88 June 14, 2000

Exhibits in support of pltffs' motion for declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment - Volume 1. (Originally received in Mag. Judge Francis' chambers in Dec. 1999. Received for docketing on 6/14/00) (emil) Modified on 06/15/2000 (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
89 June 14, 2000

Exhibits in support of pltffs' motion for declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment - Volume II. (Originally received in Mag. Judge Francis' chambers in Dec. 1999. Received for docketing on 6/14/00) (emil) (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
90 June 14, 2000

Exhibits in support of pltffs' motion for declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment - Volume III. (Originally received in Mag. Judge Francis' chambers in Dec. 1999. Received for docketing on 6/14/00) (emil) Modified on 06/15/2000 (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
91 June 14, 2000

Exhibits in support of pltffs' motion for declaratory judgment and partial summary judgment - Volume IV. (Originally received in Mag. Judge Francis' chambers in Dec. 1999. Received for docketing on 6/14/00) (emil) (Entered: 06/15/2000)

RECAP
92 June 23, 2000

Objection(s) by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman et al to City Defts' Education Plan for the Rikers Island Academies (cd) (Entered: 06/27/2000)

RECAP
93 June 23, 2000

DECLARATION of Robert Rutherford by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman in support Re: [92-1] miscellaneous . (cd) (Entered: 06/27/2000)

RECAP
94 June 23, 2000

DECLARATION of Robert Sattler by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman in support Re: [92-1] miscellaneous . (cd) (Entered: 06/27/2000)

RECAP
95 June 23, 2000

DECLARATION of Patrick McManus by Zakunda-Ze Handberry, Marlon Coleman et al in support Re: [92-1] miscellaneous (cd) (Entered: 06/27/2000)

RECAP
96 June 30, 2000

ORDER; regarding City's proposed plan after the hearings of June 28 and June 29,000, the Court order as set forth in this Order; the next conference in this case will be held on 9/11/00 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 26A . ( signed by Judge Constance B. Motley ); Copies mailed. (pl) (Entered: 06/30/2000)

RECAP
97 Sept. 6, 2000

Transcript of record of proceedings before Judge Constance B. Motley for the date(s) of 6/29/00. (jp) (Entered: 09/06/2000)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

New York

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Disability Rights

Education

Juvenile Institution

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 14, 1996

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Class of individuals aged 16 through 21 years in the custody of DOC who are entitled to educational services.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Legal Services/Legal Aid

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

City

New York City Board of Education

New York City Department of Correction

State

New York State Education Department

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Indv. w/ Disab. Educ. Act (IDEA), Educ. of All Handcpd. Children Act , 20 U.S.C. § 1400

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Southern District of New York 1:96-cv-06161

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 03-00047

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 03-00065

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 02-00251

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 02-00279

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Declaratory Judgment

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Monitoring

Monitor/Master

Reporting

Issues

General/Misc.:

Education

Juveniles

Recommended Citation