Case: National Council of La Raza v. Department of Justice

1:03-cv-02559 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: April 14, 2003

Closed Date: May 31, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 2003 a coalition of immigration rights organizations, represented by the ACLU Immigration Rights Project, brought suit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to compel production of internal DOJ policy memorandum relating to state and local police agency authority to enforce the federal immigration laws. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and brought pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552.Until 2002, the DOJ…

In 2003 a coalition of immigration rights organizations, represented by the ACLU Immigration Rights Project, brought suit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to compel production of internal DOJ policy memorandum relating to state and local police agency authority to enforce the federal immigration laws. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and brought pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552.

Until 2002, the DOJ's official position was that state and local police lacked inherent authority to enforce non-criminal immigration laws. That position changed in 2002 and was announced to the public in a press conference in June 2002 by then Attorney General John Ashcroft. During the press conference, the Attorney General referred to an unpublished DOJ Office of Legal Counsel Memorandum issued in April 2002. Plaintiffs sought production of the April 2002 OCL Memorandum and documents associated with it. The DOJ resisted disclosure and the litigation ensued.

The District Court (Judge Lewis A. Kaplan) granted the organizations' motion to compel disclosure of the April 2002 OCL Memorandum, with certain redactions, but denied disclosure of documents leading up to the formulation of that Memorandum. National Council of La Raza v. Department of Justice, 337 F.Supp.2d 524 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) and National Council, 345 F.Supp.2d 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).

The DOJ appealed and the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Circuit Judge Katzmann) affirmed, overruling claims of deliberative process exemption and attorney-client privilege. National Council of La Raza v. Department of Justice, 411 F.3d 350 (2nd Cir. 2005) No further case activity is noted.

A redacted version of the April 2002 OCL Memorandum that was produced appears as part of our document collection for this case.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Daligga (7/6/2012)

People


Judge(s)

Baer, Harold (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Campos, Sara (California)

Cassell, Michael David (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Comey, James B. (New York)

Corwin, Neil M. (New York)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:03-cv-02559

Docket (PACER)

National Council of La Raza et al. v. Department of Justice

Nov. 15, 2005

Nov. 15, 2005

Docket
1

1:03-cv-02559

Complaint

National Council of La Raza et al. v. Department of Justice

April 14, 2003

April 14, 2003

Complaint
24

1:03-cv-02559

Memorandum Opinion

National Council of La Raza et al. v. Department of Justice

Sept. 24, 2004

Sept. 24, 2004

Order/Opinion

337 F.Supp.2d 524

30

1:03-cv-02559

Order

National Council of La Raza et al. v. Department of Justice

Oct. 12, 2004

Oct. 12, 2004

Order/Opinion

2004 WL 2283822

37

1:03-cv-02559

Memorandum Opinion

National Council of La Raza et al. v. Department of Justice

Nov. 22, 2004

Nov. 22, 2004

Order/Opinion

345 F.Supp.2d 412

04-05474

Appellate Opinion

National Council of La Raza et al. v. Department of Justice

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

May 31, 2005

May 31, 2005

Order/Opinion

411 F.3d 350

1:04-cv-05444

OCL - Memorandum for the Attorney General

National Council of La Raza et al. v. Department of Justice

July 22, 2005

July 22, 2005

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

Last updated Dec. 19, 2024, 10:14 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 14, 2003

Closing Date: May 31, 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Public interest immigration organizations

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

National Immigration Law Center

ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

U.S. Department of Justice, Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), 5 U.S.C. § 552

Constitutional Clause(s):

Federalism (including 10th Amendment)

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Order Duration: 2004 - None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Records Disclosure

Immigration/Border:

Undocumented immigrants - state and local regulation