Case: Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch

3:08-cv-01551 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 3, 2008

Closed Date: May 27, 2014

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 3, 2008, several lessors and lessees of residential accommodations in Farmers Branch, Texas, filed a lawsuit against the city in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, under the Supremacy Clause; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et. seq.; and the Texas Equal Rights Amendment. The plaintiffs, represented by private and public interest counsel, asked the court for monetary, declaratory and injuncti…

On September 3, 2008, several lessors and lessees of residential accommodations in Farmers Branch, Texas, filed a lawsuit against the city in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, under the Supremacy Clause; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et. seq.; and the Texas Equal Rights Amendment. The plaintiffs, represented by private and public interest counsel, asked the court for monetary, declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that the city's recently adopted Ordinance 2952 violated both the federal and state constitutions and the FHA. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that the ordinance's requirement that anyone wishing to rent a home or apartment prove U.S. citizenship or lawful residence and its requirement that landlords evict all tenants that cannot produce such proof were preempted by federal immigration law, in violation of the due process clause of the federal constitution, and in violation of equal protection measures in the federal and state constitutions and the FHA.

The Northern District had already permanently enjoined a substantially similar law, Ordinance 2903, on May 28, 2008. (See Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, and the two cases consolidated with it, Vazquez v. City of Farmers Branch and Barrietos v. City of Farmers Branch, for more information; see also Ramos v. City of Farmers Branch, a case on the ordinance brought in Texas state court.) Ordinance 2952 was passed in response to this injunction, and differed from its predecessor in two main ways: (1) it did not incorporate the HUD (Housing and Urban Development) classification system for non-citizen eligibility for housing, and (2) it reserved all determinations of immigration status to the federal government instead of deputizing landlords or local officials.

On September 12, 2008, the Court (Judge Jane J. Boyle) entered a temporary restraining order against Ordinance 2952, and on September 22 it granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction.

After a series of disputes over discovery and admissible evidence in 2009, on March 24, 2010, the Court (Judge Boyle) granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and denied that of the defendant. Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, 701 F. Supp. 2d 835 (N.D. Tex. 2010). It held that the ordinance was preempted by the Supremacy Clause, in that it was an attempt to regulate in the exclusively federal sphere of immigration, and that it was further preempted by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101, et seq., which was meant to be the only means of adjudicating the status of non-citizens and the uniform enforcement of which the ordinance undermined. On March 24, the Court issued an order permanently enjoining the ordinance from being enforced.

The defendants appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and after hearing arguments (October 4, 2011), a three-judge panel (Judge Thomas M. Reavley, Judge Jennifer W. Elrod and Judge James E. Graves Jr.) affirmed the lower court's decision on March 21, 2012. Villas at Parkside Partner v. City of Farmers Branch, 675 F.3d 802 (5th Cir. 2012). In an opinion by Judge Reavley, the panel held that the ordinance was not, as the city maintained, a residential housing regulation, but an impermissible attempt to regulate immigration that impeded the federal government's ability to uniformly enforce its immigration laws and threatened to interfere with its handling of foreign affairs. Judge Elrod, dissenting in part, would have held that the ordinance merely attached consequences to a federal determination of immigration status and did not attempt to regulate immigration per se, but that it was nonetheless preempted in part because the ordinance granted jurisdiction to state courts to review the immigration status of individuals, thus interfering with federal enforcement.

After the appellate ruling, Farmers Branch petitioned for a rehearing of the case en banc, which a majority of the Fifth Circuit appellate court judges approved on July 31, 2012. Then on July 22, 2013, in a 9-5 judgment, the 14-judge en banc panel struck down the ordinance. The 5-judge plurality opinion (Judge Stephen A. Higginson) held the criminal provisions of the ordinance to be conflict-preempted for presenting an obstacle to the purposes of federal anti-harboring law and federal authority to arrest and detain for possible unlawful presence, while the judicial review section of the ordinance was held to be explicitly preempted because federal law reserves the power to classify non-citizens to the federal government. The plurality proceeded to invalidate the entire law because they found the impermissible portions to be unseverable. The Reavely and Dennis opinions held the entirety of the ordinance conflict-preempted on broader grounds. In her partial concurrence/partial dissent, Judge Owen found only subsection (E)(4) and a sentence of (E)(5) from the judicial review section to be preempted, holding the rest of the ordinance not to be in conflict with federal law.

The 5-judge dissent (Judges Edith H. Jones and Jennifer Walker Elrod) found an even narrower portion of the ordinance's judicial review provisions to have been preempted, maintaining that the rest of the ordinance was not in conflict with federal law. The dissent further found that the plurality's severability analysis was flawed, explaining that the ordinance could stand on its own, even divested of criminal penalties, because of the presence of the civil penalties.

Farmers Branch then appealed to the Supreme Court, which denied cert on Mar. 7, 2014. The parties then settled on an attorneys' fees in meditation.

In March 2024 the case was closed. 

Summary Authors

Christopher Schad (6/4/2012)

Kenneth Gray (7/30/2013)

Ava Morgenstern (9/19/2017)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5027814/parties/villas-at-parkside-partners-v-the-city-of-farmers-branch-texas/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Anello, Farrin R (New York)

Arias, Jose Guadalupe (Texas)

Attorney, Rebecca L.

Attorney for Defendant
Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Attorney, Jeffrey Eric

Bernal, Diego Manuel (Texas)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:08-cv-01551

Docket [PACER]

April 27, 2015

April 27, 2015

Docket

Ordinance No. 2952

Villas at Parkside Partners v. Farmers Branch

No Court

Jan. 22, 2008

Jan. 22, 2008

Statute/Ordinance/Regulation
1

3:08-cv-01551

Plaintiffs' Complaint and Jury Demand

Sept. 3, 2008

Sept. 3, 2008

Complaint
22

3:08-cv-01551

3:08-cv-01615

Order (consolidating with Case No. 08-1551)

Reyes v. City of Farmers Branch

Sept. 16, 2008

Sept. 16, 2008

Order/Opinion
177

3:08-cv-01551

Memorandum Opinion and Order

March 24, 2010

March 24, 2010

Order/Opinion

701 F.Supp.2d 835

3:08-cv-01551

Press Release

Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch

No Court

March 24, 2010

March 24, 2010

Press Release

10-10751

Opinion (5th Cir.)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

March 21, 2012

March 21, 2012

Order/Opinion

675 F.3d 802

10-10751

Order (granting En Banc rehearing)

Villas at Parkside Partners v. Farmers Branch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

July 31, 2012

July 31, 2012

Order/Opinion

688 F.3d 801

10-10751

En Banc Opinion

Villas at Parkside Partners v. Farmers Branch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

July 22, 2013

July 22, 2013

Order/Opinion

726 F.3d 524

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5027814/villas-at-parkside-partners-v-the-city-of-farmers-branch-texas/

Last updated Sept. 17, 2025, 4:53 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against The City of Farmers Branch Texas filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd. (Filing fee $350; Receipt number 24761) (tln) (Entered: 09/03/2008)

Sept. 3, 2008

Sept. 3, 2008

Clearinghouse
2

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd. (tln) (Entered: 09/03/2008)

Sept. 3, 2008

Sept. 3, 2008

PACER
3

Summons Issued as to The City of Farmers Branch Texas. (tln) (Entered: 09/03/2008)

Sept. 3, 2008

Sept. 3, 2008

PACER
4

SUMMONS Returned Executed as to The City of Farmers Branch Texas ; served on 9/3/2008. (lmp) (Entered: 09/05/2008)

Sept. 4, 2008

Sept. 4, 2008

PACER
10

MOTION to Enlarge Page limits for Plaintiffs' Brief In Support of Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Relief filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Biles, C) Modified on 9/9/2008 (svc). (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
11

Plaintiffs' Amended re: 2 Cert. Of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd (Biles, C) Modified on 9/8/2008 (tln). (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
12

AMENDED DOCUMENT by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd. Amendment to 7 Appendix in Support,. Main appendix document. (Biles, C) (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
5

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd (Biles, C) (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
6

Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd re 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Biles, C) (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
7

Appendix in Support filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd re 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Injunctive Relief (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Appendix, # 3 Appendix, # 4 Appendix, # 5 Appendix, # 6 Appendix, # 7 Appendix) (Biles, C) (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
8

MOTION to Transfer filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Biles, C) Modified on 9/8/2008 (tln). (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
9

Appendix in Support filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd re 8 MOTION to Transfer (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Appendix, # 3 Appendix, # 4 Appendix, # 5 Appendix) (Biles, C) (Entered: 09/08/2008)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
13

ORDER granting 10 Motion to Enlarge Page limits for Plaintiffs' Brief In Support of Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. The page limit for Plaintiffs' Brief In Support Of Plaintiffs' Application For A Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction is enlarged to thirty-five pages. Defendant's Brief in Support of Its Response to Plaintiffs' Application may also be thirty-five pages. (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 09/09/08) (lmp) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

Sept. 9, 2008

Sept. 9, 2008

PACER
14

RESPONSE in Opposition filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas re 8 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division (Jung, Peter) (Entered: 09/11/2008)

Sept. 11, 2008

Sept. 11, 2008

PACER
15

Appendix in Support filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas re 14 Response in Opposition to Motion to Transfer (Jung, Peter) (Entered: 09/11/2008)

Sept. 11, 2008

Sept. 11, 2008

PACER
16

RESPONSE in Opposition filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas re 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Injunctive Relief (Jung, Peter) (Entered: 09/11/2008)

Sept. 11, 2008

Sept. 11, 2008

PACER
17

Appendix in Support filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas re 16 Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Jung, Peter) (Entered: 09/11/2008)

Sept. 11, 2008

Sept. 11, 2008

PACER
18

Plaintiffs' REPLY In Support re: 8 MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd (Biles, C) (Entered: 09/11/2008)

Sept. 11, 2008

Sept. 11, 2008

PACER
19

Application and Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Kris W Kobach for The City of Farmers Branch Texas. (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/11/08) (svc) (Entered: 09/12/2008)

Sept. 11, 2008

Sept. 11, 2008

PACER
20

Declaration of C. Dunham Biles by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits 1-5, # 2 Exhibits 6-7, # 3 Exhibit 8, # 4 Exhibits 9-10) (Biles, C) Modified on 9/15/2008 (klm). (Entered: 09/12/2008)

Sept. 12, 2008

Sept. 12, 2008

PACER
21

ORDER granting 5 Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order re City of Farmers Branch Ordinance No. 2592. Hearing on the application for preliminary injunction is scheduled for 9/22/2008 at 10:00 a.m. [see TRO for specifics] (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/12/2008) (caw) (Entered: 09/12/2008)

Sept. 12, 2008

Sept. 12, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jane J Boyle: Hearing held on 09/12/08. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - James Renard; Defense - Peter Jung. (Court Reporter Shawnie Archuleta.) Time in Court: 3 hours 30 minutes. NO PDF ATTACHED - THIS IS A VIRTUAL MINUTE ENTRY. (psm)

Sept. 12, 2008

Sept. 12, 2008

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines as to Plaintiffs' Application for Preliminary Injunction. Hearing set for 9/22/2008 10:00 AM before Judge Jane J Boyle per doc. 21. (klm)

Sept. 12, 2008

Sept. 12, 2008

PACER

Receipt of payment for Registry Fund. Authorized by 21 Order on Motion for TRO,. $1,500.00; Receipt # DS025093. (axc)

Sept. 15, 2008

Sept. 15, 2008

PACER
22

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1615-B is hereby consolidated with Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1551-B. (see order) (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/16/2008) (axm) Modified on 9/17/2008 (axm). (Entered: 09/16/2008)

Sept. 16, 2008

Sept. 16, 2008

Clearinghouse
23

ORDER: Consolidated Plaintiffs should file any Motion for Preliminary Injunction and supporting material no later than 9/19/2008 at noon. Defendant may submit a written response no later than 9 a.m. on 9/22/2008. The hearing on Consolidated Plaintiffs' Motion (if any) will be consolidated with the hearing on the original Plaintiffs' Application for Preliminary Injunction already set 9/22/2008 at 10:00 a.m. (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/16/2008) (axm) (Entered: 09/16/2008)

Sept. 16, 2008

Sept. 16, 2008

PACER
24

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The City of Farmers Branch Texas. (Jung, Peter) (Entered: 09/17/2008)

Sept. 17, 2008

Sept. 17, 2008

PACER
25

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias, Alfred Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 9/19/2008 (klm). (Entered: 09/18/2008)

Sept. 18, 2008

Sept. 18, 2008

PACER
26

MOTION for Leave to Extend Page Limitations to Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of their Application for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias, Alfred Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 9/19/2008 (klm). (Entered: 09/18/2008)

Sept. 18, 2008

Sept. 18, 2008

PACER
27

Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias, Alfred Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza. re 26 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages, 25 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 9/19/2008 (klm). (Entered: 09/18/2008)

Sept. 18, 2008

Sept. 18, 2008

PACER
28

ORDER granting 26 Motion for Leave to Extend Page Limitations to Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of their Application for a Preliminary Injunction. Consolidated Plaintiffs' Motion will be allowed to remain on file. (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 09/19/08) (lmp) (Entered: 09/19/2008)

Sept. 19, 2008

Sept. 19, 2008

PACER
29

MOTION for Entry of Scheduling Order filed by Alfredo Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 9/22/2008 (jrb). (Entered: 09/19/2008)

Sept. 19, 2008

Sept. 19, 2008

PACER
31

Application and Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Farrin R Anello for Alfredo Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza, Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards and Jose Guadalupe Arias. (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/19/2008) (axm) (Entered: 09/22/2008)

Sept. 19, 2008

Sept. 19, 2008

PACER
30

OBJECTION to Preliminary Injunction Evidence re: 12 Amended Document, 27 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion, 20 Affidavit, 7 Appendix in Support, filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas (Jung, Peter) (Entered: 09/22/2008)

Sept. 22, 2008

Sept. 22, 2008

PACER
33

AGREED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court hereby Grants the 25 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. It is further ordered that the bond posted by the Villas Plaintiffs in connection with the Court's temporary restraining order shall serve as Plaintiffs' bond for this Preliminary Injunction. (see order) (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 09/22/2008) (axm) (Entered: 09/23/2008)

Sept. 22, 2008

Sept. 22, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jane J Boyle: Hearing held on 09/22/08. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - James Renard; Defense - Peter Jung. (Court Reporter Shawnie Archuleta.) Time in Court: 10 minutes. NO PDF ATTACHED - THIS IS A VIRTUAL MINUTE ENTRY. (psm)

Sept. 22, 2008

Sept. 22, 2008

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines per Order (doc 33): Discovery due by 10/22/2008. Motions due by 10/29/2008. Responses due by 11/10/2008. (axm)

Sept. 22, 2008

Sept. 22, 2008

PACER
32

ANSWER to 1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas (Jung, Peter) Modified on 9/24/2008 (jrb). (Entered: 09/23/2008)

Sept. 23, 2008

Sept. 23, 2008

PACER
34

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marisol L Perez for Farrin R. Anello on behalf of Alfredo Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias. (Perez, Marisol) (Entered: 09/24/2008)

Sept. 24, 2008

Sept. 24, 2008

PACER
35

ORDER denying 8 Motion to Transfer Case. (see order) (Signed by Judge Jane J Boyle on 12/26/08) (lmp) Modified on 9/29/2008 (lmp). (Entered: 09/29/2008)

Sept. 26, 2008

Sept. 26, 2008

PACER
36

TRANSCRIPT of Temporary Restraining Order Proceedings held on September 12, 2008 before Judge Boyle. Court Reporter/Transcriber Shawnie Archuleta, Telephone number 214-753-2747. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript. A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Redaction Request - Transcript must be filed within 21 days. If no such Request is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed. Redaction Request due 10/23/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/3/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/31/2008. (spa) (Entered: 10/02/2008)

Oct. 2, 2008

Oct. 2, 2008

PACER
37

Defendant's Original Answer filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas to Reyes Plaintiffs' Original Verified Complaint. (Jung, Peter) Modified on 10/6/2008 (skt). (Entered: 10/04/2008)

Oct. 4, 2008

Oct. 4, 2008

PACER
38

Joint MOTION to Extend Time of Pretrial Deadlines filed by Alfredo Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza, Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, The City of Farmers Branch Texas, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Biles, C) (Entered: 10/10/2008)

Oct. 10, 2008

Oct. 10, 2008

PACER
39

Agreed MOTION Enlarge Page Limits for Motions for Summary Judgment Briefs, Responses and Reply Briefs filed by Alfredo Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza, Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, The City of Farmers Branch Texas, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Dowdy, William Trey) (Entered: 10/10/2008)

Oct. 10, 2008

Oct. 10, 2008

PACER
40

ORDER granting 38 Joint MOTION to Extend Time of Pretrial Deadline. Discovery due by 11/24/2008. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/10/08) (lmp) (Entered: 10/14/2008)

Oct. 10, 2008

Oct. 10, 2008

PACER
41

ORDER denying 39 Agreed MOTION Enlarge Page Limits for Motions for Summary Judgment Briefs, Responses and Reply Briefs. Counsel are advised to consult Local Rule 56.5(b) regarding summary judgment brief lengths. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/10/08) (lmp) (Entered: 10/14/2008)

Oct. 10, 2008

Oct. 10, 2008

PACER
42

Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss Claims filed by Alfredo Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Perales, Nina) (Entered: 10/17/2008)

Oct. 17, 2008

Oct. 17, 2008

PACER
43

Application and Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Michael M Hethmon for The City of Farmers Branch Texas. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/22/08) (skt) (Entered: 10/23/2008)

Oct. 22, 2008

Oct. 22, 2008

PACER
48

ORDER: Having considered Plaintiffs Alfredo Vasquez and Maria de la Luz Vasquez's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) (doc #42), the Court finds that the Motion is meritorious and it is therefore GRANTED. Plaintiffs Alfredo Vasquez and Maria de la Luz Vasquez are hereby DISMISSED from this case. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/23/08) (lmp) (Entered: 10/27/2008)

Oct. 23, 2008

Oct. 23, 2008

PACER
44

Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time Page Limits filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd (Biles, C) (Entered: 10/24/2008)

Oct. 24, 2008

Oct. 24, 2008

PACER
45

***UNFILED PER ORDER OF 10/27/08, DOC. 47*** MOTION to Compel For Attorneys' and Sanctions filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Biles, C) Modified on 10/27/2008 (klm). (Entered: 10/24/2008)

Oct. 24, 2008

Oct. 24, 2008

PACER
46

***UNFILED PER ORDER OF 10/27/08, DOC. 47*** Appendix in Support filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd re 45 MOTION to Compel For Attorneys' and Sanctions (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit) (Biles, C) Modified on 10/27/2008 (klm). (Entered: 10/25/2008)

Oct. 25, 2008

Oct. 25, 2008

PACER
47

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY PROTOCOL. Unfiling Plaintiffs' 45 MOTION to Compel For Attorneys' and Sanctions and Plaintiffs' 46 Appendix in Support due to the following deficiency: Villas Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Compel and Brief prior to the Court ruling on their Motion for Page Extension. Denying 44 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time Page Limits filed by Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd, Mary Miller Smith, Chateau Ritz Partners, Villas at Parkside Partners. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/27/08) (lmp) (Entered: 10/27/2008)

Oct. 27, 2008

Oct. 27, 2008

PACER
49

MOTION to Extend Pretrial Deadlines filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas (Dowdy, William Trey) Modified on 11/13/2008 (jyg). (Entered: 11/12/2008)

Nov. 12, 2008

Nov. 12, 2008

PACER
50

Opposed MOTION to Modify Scheduling Order filed by Valentin Reyes. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 11/13/2008 (jyg). (Entered: 11/12/2008)

Nov. 12, 2008

Nov. 12, 2008

PACER
51

RESPONSE filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias re 49 MOTION to Extend Time Pretrial Deadlines (Perales, Nina) (Entered: 11/13/2008)

Nov. 13, 2008

Nov. 13, 2008

PACER
52

ORDER granting 49 Motion to Extend Pretrial Deadlines.; denying 50 Opposed MOTION to Modify Scheduling Order. Discovery (deposition) due by 1/30/2009. Motions due by 2/10/2009. Replies due by 3/2/2009. Responses due by 2/23/2009. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 11/13/08) (lmp) (Entered: 11/14/2008)

Nov. 13, 2008

Nov. 13, 2008

PACER
53

Proof of Service for Subpoena in a Civil Case served on Mary Jane Stevenson on 12/09/08. (lmp) (Entered: 12/11/2008)

Dec. 11, 2008

Dec. 11, 2008

PACER
54

Proof of Service for Subpoena in a Civil Case served on Robert Phelps aka Bob C. Phelps on 12/09/08. (lmp) (Entered: 12/11/2008)

Dec. 11, 2008

Dec. 11, 2008

PACER
55

Proof of Service for Subpoena in a Civil Case served on Linda Groomer on 12/09/08. (lmp) (Entered: 12/11/2008)

Dec. 11, 2008

Dec. 11, 2008

PACER
56

Proof of Service for Subpoena served on Robert Phelps aka Bob C. Phelps on 12/11/2008. (axm) (Entered: 12/15/2008)

Dec. 15, 2008

Dec. 15, 2008

PACER
57

Application and Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Henry L Solano for Villas at Parkside Partners. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 12/15/2008) (axm) (Entered: 12/15/2008)

Dec. 15, 2008

Dec. 15, 2008

PACER
58

Application and Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Dominic Valerian for Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards and Jose Guadalupe Arias (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 12/16/08) (svc) (Entered: 12/17/2008)

Dec. 16, 2008

Dec. 16, 2008

PACER
59

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Diego Manuel Bernal on behalf of Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias. (Bernal, Diego) (Entered: 01/16/2009)

Jan. 16, 2009

Jan. 16, 2009

PACER
60

***UNFILED PER ORDER/DOC. 64***Objections to Plaintiffs' Notice of Deposition and MOTION for Protective Order filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas (Shanes, Scott) Modified on 1/28/2009 (skt). Modified on 2/4/2009 (tln). (Entered: 01/27/2009)

Jan. 27, 2009

Jan. 27, 2009

PACER
61

MOTION to Strike 60 Objections to Notice of Deposition and MOTION for Protective Order filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Text of Proposed Order) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 2/2/2009 (jyg). (Entered: 01/30/2009)

Jan. 30, 2009

Jan. 30, 2009

PACER
62

NOTICE of Filing of Stipulation Regarding Discovery filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Perales, Nina) (Entered: 02/03/2009)

Feb. 3, 2009

Feb. 3, 2009

PACER
63

ORDER REFERRING 61 Motion to Strike 60 Objections to Notice of Deposition and MOTION for Protective Order, filed by Aide Garza, Ginger Edwards, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Jose Guadalupe Arias, 60 Objections to Plaintiffs' Notice of Deposition and MOTION for Protective Order filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 02/04/09) (lmp) (Entered: 02/04/2009)

Feb. 4, 2009

Feb. 4, 2009

PACER
64

Order Unfiling 60 Objections to Plaintiffs' Notice of Deposition and Motion for Protective Order for noncompliance with the Courts express order; denying as moot 61 Motion to Strike. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez on 2/4/2009) (axm) (Entered: 02/04/2009)

Feb. 4, 2009

Feb. 4, 2009

PACER
65

MOTION to Extend Time for Summary Judgment Briefing to Permit Resolution of Discovery Dispute filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Perales, Nina) (Entered: 02/06/2009)

Feb. 6, 2009

Feb. 6, 2009

PACER
66

RESPONSE filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas re 65 MOTION to Extend Time for Summary Judgment Briefing to Permit Resolution of Discovery Dispute (Jung, Peter) (Entered: 02/09/2009)

Feb. 9, 2009

Feb. 9, 2009

PACER
67

REPLY re: 65 MOTION to Extend Time for Summary Judgment Briefing to Permit Resolution of Discovery Dispute filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Perales, Nina) (Entered: 02/09/2009)

Feb. 9, 2009

Feb. 9, 2009

PACER
68

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09*** MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas (Jung, Peter) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/10/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
69

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09***Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas re 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Jung, Peter) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/10/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
70

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09***Appendix in Support filed by The City of Farmers Branch Texas re 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Appendix Part 1, # 2 Appendix Appendix Part 2, # 3 Appendix Appendix Part 3, # 4 Appendix Appendix Part 4) (Jung, Peter) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/10/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
71

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09*** MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd (Biles, C) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/10/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
72

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09***Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd re 71 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Biles, C) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/10/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
73

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09***Appendix in Support filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd re 72 Brief/Memorandum in Support of Motion (Biles, C) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/10/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
74

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09*** MOTION for Summary Judgment by Reyes Plaintiffs filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Perales, Nina) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/10/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
75

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09***Appendix in Support filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias re 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Reyes Plaintiffs and Memorandum in Support (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Part 1, # 2 Appendix Part 2, # 3 Appendix Part 3, # 4 Appendix Part 4, # 5 Appendix Part 5, # 6 Appendix Part 6, # 7 Appendix Part 7, # 8 Appendix Part 8, # 9 Appendix Part 9, # 10 Appendix Part 10, # 11 Appendix Part 11, # 12 Appendix Part 12, # 13 Appendix Part 13, # 14 Appendix Part 14, # 15 Appendix Part 15, # 16 Appendix Part 16, # 17 Appendix Part 17, # 18 Appendix Part 18, # 19 Appendix Part 19, # 20 Appendix Part 20, # 21 Appendix Part 21, # 22 Appendix Part 22, # 23 Appendix Part 23, # 24 Appendix Part 24, # 25 Appendix Part 25, # 26 Appendix Part 26, # 27 Appendix Part 27, # 28 Appendix Part 28, # 29 Appendix Part 29, # 30 Appendix Part 30) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/11/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
77

ORDER granting 65 Reyes Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Summary Judgment Deadlines to Permit Resolution of Discovery Dispute. The parties are instructed to meet face-to-face no later than Wednesday, 2/11/2009 in an attempt to resolve the dispute regarding Defendants designation of a new fact witness on 2/5/2009. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/10/09) (klm) (Entered: 02/11/2009)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER

Resetting Deadlines Per #77: Motions for summary judgment due by 2/24/2009. Responses to motions for summary judgment due by 3/9/2009, Replies to motions for summary judgment due by 3/16/2009. See Order #77. (svc)

Feb. 10, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009

PACER
76

***STRICKEN PER ORDER OF 2/11/09***Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias re 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Reyes Plaintiffs (Perales, Nina) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jrb). (Entered: 02/11/2009)

Feb. 11, 2009

Feb. 11, 2009

PACER
78

Amended Appendix to Villas Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Appendix, # 3 Appendix, # 4 Appendix) (Biles, C) Modified on 2/12/2009 (lmp). (Entered: 02/11/2009)

Feb. 11, 2009

Feb. 11, 2009

PACER
79

Order. In light of the Court's February 10, 2009 Order granting the Reyes Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Summary Judgment Deadlines to Permit Resolution of Discovery Dispute (Doc. # 77), the court directs the Clerk of Court to strike Docket Entries #68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, and 76. The court admonishes Defendant to comply with the deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order (Doc. # 40, as modified by Doc. #52). (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 02/11/09) (lmp) (Entered: 02/11/2009)

Feb. 11, 2009

Feb. 11, 2009

PACER
80

Joint Submission of Discovery Dispute pursuant to Court's Order Regarding Discovery Protocol filed by Aide Garza, Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, The City of Farmers Branch Texas, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-F, # 2 Exhibit G-H) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 2/23/2009 (axm). (Entered: 02/20/2009)

Feb. 20, 2009

Feb. 20, 2009

PACER
81

ORDER OF REFERRAL: The Court directs the parties to submit a joint statement clarifying the reason for this delay no later than 2/25/2009. Further, Discovery Disputes #1, #2 and #3 set forth in the Joint Submission (Doc. #80) are hereby REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Irma C. Ramirez for hearing. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/23/2009) (axm) (Entered: 02/23/2009)

Feb. 23, 2009

Feb. 23, 2009

PACER
82

REVISED ORDER OF REFERRAL: The Court withdraws the referral of Discovery Dispute #1. This Order in no way alters the Court's referral of Discovery Disputes #2 and #3 to the Magistrate Judge, or any other aspect of the Court's 2/23/2009 Order of Referral. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/24/09) (klm) (Entered: 02/24/2009)

Feb. 24, 2009

Feb. 24, 2009

PACER
83

ORDER: The Court has scheduled a hearing on Discovery Disputes #2 and #3 in the Joint Submission Regarding Discovery Dispute for 2/27/2009 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez on 2/24/2009) (axm) (Entered: 02/24/2009)

Feb. 24, 2009

Feb. 24, 2009

PACER
84

JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING THE FILING OF THE JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE filed by Alfredo Vasquez, Maria de la Luz Vasquez, Aide Garza, Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, The City of Farmers Branch Texas, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Perales, Nina) Modified on 2/26/2009 (lmp). (Entered: 02/25/2009)

Feb. 25, 2009

Feb. 25, 2009

PACER
85

ORDER SETTING HEARING: In keeping with the expedited schedule agreed to by the parties, the Court has scheduled a hearing on 2/27/2009 11:00 AM before Judge Jane J Boyle. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/25/09) (klm) (Entered: 02/25/2009)

Feb. 25, 2009

Feb. 25, 2009

PACER
86

ORDER: The Court conducted a hearing on the record concerning the referred discovery disputes. After consideration of the relevant filings, evidence, oral argument, and applicable law, and for the reasons stated on the record during the hearing, the relief sought in both disputes is hereby GRANTED. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez on 2/27/09) (klm) (Entered: 02/27/2009)

Feb. 27, 2009

Feb. 27, 2009

PACER
87

ORDER: The Court DENIES the Reyes Plaintiffs' and Villas Plaintiffs' request that the Court strike the proposed testimony of Neil Jacobs. The Court directs the parties to submit to the Court no later than Wednesday, 3/4/2009 at 3:00 p.m., an agreed proposal governing further discovery and summary judgment deadlines in this case, such that any possible prejudice to the Reyes Plaintiffs and Villas Plaintiffs will be alleviated. The 9/22/2008 agreed preliminary injunction remains in place. (Doc. # 33). (See Order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/27/09) (skt) (Entered: 03/02/2009)

Feb. 27, 2009

Feb. 27, 2009

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez: Hearing on discovery disputes named in Joint Submission filed on 2/20/09, held on 2/27/09. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Marisol Perez, Dunham Biles, Jack Ternan; Defense - Scott Shanes, Michael Jung, Kris Kobach.(Digital File) Time in Court: 1 hour. NO PDF ATTACHED - THIS IS A VIRTUAL MINUTE ENTRY. (lmm)

Feb. 27, 2009

Feb. 27, 2009

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jane J Boyle: Hearing held on 02/27/09. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Marisol Perez; Defense - Michael Jung. (Court Reporter Shawnie Archuleta.) Time in Court: 20 minutes. NO PDF ATTACHED - THIS IS A VIRTUAL MINUTE ENTRY. (psm)

Feb. 27, 2009

Feb. 27, 2009

PACER
88

NOTICE Joint Advisory Regarding Further Discovery and Summary Judgment Deadlines filed by Aide Garza, Chateau Ritz Partners, Mary Miller Smith, Villas at Parkside Partners, The City of Farmers Branch Texas, Lakeview at Parkside Partners Ltd, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias (Perales, Nina) (Entered: 03/04/2009)

March 4, 2009

March 4, 2009

PACER
89

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Motion to Strike Proceedings held on 2/27/09 before Judge Jane J Boyle. Court Reporter/Transcriber Shawnie Archuleta, Telephone number 214/753-2747. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript. A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Redaction Request - Transcript must be filed within 21 days. If no such Request is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed. Redaction Request due 3/25/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/6/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/2/2009. (jyg) (Entered: 03/04/2009)

March 4, 2009

March 4, 2009

PACER
90

ORDER: The parties have submitted a Joint Advisory Regarding Further Discovery and Summary Judgment Deadlines. The existing Scheduling Order is further modified. April 20, 2009 deadline for filing summary judgment motions. May 4, 2009 deadline for responses to summary judgment motions. May 11, 2009 deadline for replies in support of summary judgment motions. (see order) (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 03/05/09) (lmp) (Entered: 03/05/2009)

March 5, 2009

March 5, 2009

PACER
91

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Discovery Disputes Proceedings held on Feb. 27, 2009 before Judge Irma Ramirez. Court Reporter/Transcriber Betty Tate, Telephone number 972-596-9442. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript. A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Redaction Request - Transcript must be filed within 21 days. If no such Request is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed.. Redaction Request due 3/30/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/7/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/5/2009. (Tate, Betty) (Entered: 03/07/2009)

March 7, 2009

March 7, 2009

PACER
100

Appendix in Support filed by Aide Garza, Valentin Reyes, Alicia Garcia, Ginger Edwards, Jose Guadalupe Arias re 92 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Part 2 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit APPX 0432-0461, # 2 Exhibit APPX 0462-0506, # 3 Exhibit APPX 0507-0557, # 4 Exhibit APPX 0558-0564, # 5 Exhibit APPX 0565-0610, # 6 Exhibit APPX 0611-642, # 7 Exhibit APPX 0643-0685, # 8 Exhibit APPX 0867-0917, # 9 Exhibit APPX 0918-0966, # 10 Exhibit APPX 0967-1038, # 11 Exhibit APPX 1039-1057, # 12 Exhibit APPX 1058-1114) (Perales, Nina) Modified on 4/21/2009 (lmp). (Entered: 04/20/2009)

April 20, 2009

April 20, 2009

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Texas

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 3, 2008

Closing Date: May 27, 2014

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Owners of and residents at several apartment complexes in Farmers Branch, Texas

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU National (all projects)

ACLU Affiliates (any)

MALDEF

ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City of Farmers Branch, TX (Dallas), City

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Fair Housing Act/Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Federalism (including 10th Amendment)

Freedom of speech/association

Supremacy Clause

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Attorneys fees

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

General/Misc.:

Housing

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Housing Sales/Rental

Discrimination Basis:

Immigration status

Immigration/Border:

Constitutional rights

Undocumented immigrants - rights and duties

Undocumented immigrants - state and local regulation