Case: ARC v. O'Meara

3:01-cv-01871 | U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut

Filed Date: Oct. 2, 2001

Closed Date: 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On October 2, 2001, Arc/Connectibut (a non-profit advocacy organization) and ten individual plaintiffs filed a lawsuit under the Medicaid statute, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the U. S. Constitution, against various state officials in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that their rights had been violated. Specifically, Plaintiffs claimed that t…

On October 2, 2001, Arc/Connectibut (a non-profit advocacy organization) and ten individual plaintiffs filed a lawsuit under the Medicaid statute, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the U. S. Constitution, against various state officials in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that their rights had been violated. Specifically, Plaintiffs claimed that the state failed to provide adequate services under the waiver, failed to provide them with a choice between institutional and home and community-based services, failing to provide services in a reasonably prompt manner, and failing to provide services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.

On August 20, 2002, the Court (Judge Janet B. Aterton) granted Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint and that fifteen additional disabled individuals would be allowed to intervene in the action. ARC/Connecticut v. O'Meara, 2002 WL 31106383 (D. Conn. Aug. 20, 2002).

The parties reached a settlement agreement, and on March 31, 2005, the Court issued an order of dismissal notifying the parties that the case was being administratively closed pending the completion of notice to class members following the Connecticut General Assembly's approval of the parties' settlement agreement.

The Court (Magistrate Judge Joan G. Margolis) preliminarily approved the settlement on April 1, 2005. The Court also entered various orders relating to class notice and the process by which the Court will make a final determination as to whether the settlement agreement will obtain final approval.

The Court approved the settlement agreement during a fairness hearing on May 20, 2005 and dismissed the case on May 31, 2005. The Court retained jurisdiction for enforcement purposes. The case was closed, and there has been no additional substantive litigation.

Summary Authors

Haley Waller (2/12/2011)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4200164/parties/arc-v-omeara/


Judge(s)

Arterton, Janet Bond (Connecticut)

Margolis, Joan Glazer (Connecticut)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Shaw, David C. (Connecticut)

Judge(s)

Arterton, Janet Bond (Connecticut)

Margolis, Joan Glazer (Connecticut)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Shaw, David C. (Connecticut)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

Docket

July 2, 2009 Docket
59

Ruling on Pending Motions [Docs.21 & 43]

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

2002 WL 31106383

Aug. 20, 2002 Order/Opinion
246-2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

March 31, 2005 Order/Opinion
245

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING NOTICE TO THE CLASS AND SCHEDULING OF A FAIRNESS HEARING

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

March 31, 2005 Pleading / Motion / Brief
248

ORDER (Approving settlement)

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

April 1, 2005 Order/Opinion
251-1

MEMORANDUM OF LAW RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT OF A CLASS ACTION

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

May 20, 2005 Pleading / Motion / Brief
255

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

May 31, 2005 Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4200164/arc-v-omeara/

Last updated May 20, 2022, 2:14 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link
1

COMPLAINT Filing Fee $ 150.00 Receipt # H4467 (D'Onofrio, B.)

Oct. 2, 2001 PACER
2

ORDER on Pretrial Deadlines handed to counsel Discovery cutoff 4/3/02 ; Dispositive Motions due 5/3/02 Amended Pleadings due 12/2/01 Motions to Dismiss due 1/2/02 (D'Onofrio, B.)

Oct. 2, 2001 PACER
3

SUMMONS Returned Executed on 10/2/01 as to Peter H. O'Meara (Warner, R.)

Oct. 9, 2001 PACER
4

APPEARANCE of Attorney for Peter H. O'Meara -- Thomas M. Fiorentino (Warren, C.)

Oct. 17, 2001 PACER
5

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 11/21/01 to respond to complaint (Warner, R.)

Oct. 19, 2001 PACER
6

APPEARANCE of Attorney for Patricia A. Wilson-Coker -- Hugh Barber (Warner, R.)

Oct. 19, 2001 PACER
7

REPORT of Parties Planning Meeting (Torday, B.)

Nov. 16, 2001 PACER
8

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara to Extend Time until 12/19/01 to respond to complaint (Warner, R.)

Nov. 20, 2001 PACER
9

MOTION by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 12/19/01 to respond to complaint (Malone, P.) Modified on 12/04/2001

Nov. 26, 2001 PACER
13

Status Conference held ( JBA) (Torday, B.)

Dec. 12, 2001 PACER
10

SCHEDULING ORDER setting Discovery cutoff 1/1/03 ; Dispositive Motions due 2/1/03 ; Status Report by 11/26/02 . Trial Ready Date Set for 8/1/03 SEE ORDER FOR OTHER DATES ( Signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.)

Dec. 14, 2001 PACER
11

ANSWER and Defenses to Complaint by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Depino, F.)

Dec. 19, 2001 PACER
12

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara to Extend Time until 12/31/01 to respond to complaint (Warner, R.)

Dec. 19, 2001 PACER
14

ANSWER to Complaint by Peter H. O'Meara (Villano, P.)

Jan. 2, 2002 PACER
15

MOTION by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, all plaintiffs to Extend Time until 1/28/02 to respond to discovery (Warner, R.)

Jan. 4, 2002 PACER
16

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information (Brief Due 2/15/02 ) (Sherman, M.)

Jan. 25, 2002 PACER
17

MOTION by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Quash subpoenas (Brief Due 2/15/02 ) (Sherman, M.)

Jan. 25, 2002 PACER
18

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in support of [17-1] motion to Quash subpoenas, [16-1] motion for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information (Sherman, M.)

Jan. 25, 2002 PACER
19

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Amend [10-1] Scheduling order (Depino, F.)

Feb. 1, 2002 PACER
20

ORDER granting [19-1] motion to Amend [10-1] Scheduling order, set Discovery deadline to 3/1/03, set Dispositive Motions due by 4/1/03, set Status Report deadline to 1/26/03 ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.) Modified on 02/12/2002

Feb. 11, 2002 PACER
21

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Amend [1-1] complaint (Brief Due 3/8/02 ) (Ruocco, M.)

Feb. 15, 2002 PACER
22

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in support of [21-1] motion to Amend [1-1] complaint (Ruocco, M.)

Feb. 15, 2002 PACER
23

MOTION by Linda O'Neill to Intervene (Brief Due 3/8/02) (Ruocco, M.)

Feb. 15, 2002 PACER
24

MEMORANDUM by Linda O'Neill in support of [23-1] motion to Intervene (Ruocco, M.)

Feb. 15, 2002 PACER
25

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in opposition to [17-1] motion to Quash subpoenas by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, [16-1] motion for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara (Ruocco, M.)

Feb. 15, 2002 PACER
26

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 3/1/02 to respond to memo in opposition to motion to quash & protective order (Malone, P.)

Feb. 22, 2002 PACER
27

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Orders concerning discovery (Brief Due 3/18/02 ) (Depino, F.)

Feb. 25, 2002 PACER
28

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in support of [27-1] motion for Orders concerning discovery (Depino, F.)

Feb. 25, 2002 PACER
29

REPLY by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to response to [17-1] motion to Quash subpoenas by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, [16-1] motion for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara (Ruocco, M.)

March 1, 2002 PACER
30

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in opposition to [21-1] motion to Amend [1-1] complaint by all plaintiffs (Ruocco, M.)

March 8, 2002 PACER
31

APPEARANCE of Attorney for Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker -- Thomas B. York (Falcone, K.)

March 12, 2002 PACER
32

ORDER of referral to Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis for discovery purposes (signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.)

March 13, 2002 PACER
33

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time to file response to plaintiffs motion for orders concerning discovery 4/2/02 (Depino, F.)

March 21, 2002 PACER
34

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [21-1] motion to Amend [1-1] complaint by all plaintiffs (Ruocco, M.)

March 22, 2002 PACER
35

OBJECTIONS by all plaintiffs to [33-1] motion to Extend Time to file response to plaintiffs motion for orders concerning discovery 4/2/02 by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara (Ruocco, M.)

March 25, 2002 PACER
36

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in opposition to [27-1] motion for Orders concerning discovery by all plaintiffs (Ruocco, M.)

April 2, 2002 PACER
37

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time of scheduling order; discovery until 5/23/02, motion for class certification until 5/13/02, opposition until 7/5/02, plaintiffs' reply until 7/18/02 (Warner, R.)

April 5, 2002 PACER
38

ORDER re courtesy copies: copies of all filings should be forwarded to chambers ( Signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Depino, F.)

April 5, 2002 PACER
39

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [27-1] motion for Orders concerning discovery by all plaintiffs (Sherman, M.)

April 16, 2002 PACER
40

ORDER granting [37-1] motion to Extend Time of scheduling order; discovery until 5/23/02, motion for class certification until 5/13/02, opposition until 7/5/02, plaintiffs' reply until 7/18/02, reset Discovery deadline to 5/23/02 ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.)

April 17, 2002 PACER
41

Discovery Conference held ( JGM) (Falcone, K.) Modified on 04/23/2002

April 17, 2002 PACER
42

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time for an additional 45 days to amend scheduling order (Sherman, M.)

April 18, 2002 PACER
43

MOTION by all plaintiffs to file an Intervening complaint (Brief Due 6/24/02) (Sherman, M.)

June 3, 2002 PACER
44

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in support of [43-1] motion to file an Intervening complaint (Sherman, M.)

June 3, 2002 PACER
45

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Amend [40-1] scheduling order reset Discovery deadline to 5/23/02 (Brief Due 7/3/02 ) (Villano, P.)

June 12, 2002 PACER
46

MOTION by all plaintiffs to file corrected copy of proposed Intervening complaint (Brief Due 7/11/02 ) (Sherman, M.)

June 20, 2002 PACER
47

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Class certification (Brief Due 7/18/02 ) (Sherman, M.)

June 27, 2002 PACER
48

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in support of [47-1] motion for Class certification (Sherman, M.)

June 27, 2002 PACER
49

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in opposition to [43-1] motion to file an Intervening complaint by all plaintiffs (Sherman, M.)

June 27, 2002 PACER
50

Intervenor's COMPLAINT by all plaintiffs against Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Villano, P.)

July 3, 2002 PACER
51

MOTION by all plaintiffs for permission to file reply brief in excess of ten pages (Sherman, M.)

July 12, 2002 PACER
52

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [43-1] motion to file an Intervening complaint by all plaintiffs (Sherman, M.)

July 12, 2002 PACER
54

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 8/5/02 to respond to motion for class certification (Warner, R.)

July 19, 2002 PACER
55

MOTION by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 8/13/02 to respond to motion for class certification (Warner, R.)

Aug. 2, 2002 PACER
56

ENDORSEMENT ORDER granting [55-1] motion to Extend Time to respond to motion for class certification until the court rules on the pending motions ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.)

Aug. 5, 2002 PACER
57

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in opposition to [47-1] motion for Class certification by all plaintiffs (Warner, R.)

Aug. 13, 2002 PACER
59

RULING granting [21-1] motion to Amend [1-1] complaint, granting [43-1] motion to file an Intervening complaint (signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton) 13 Pages (Villano, P.)

Aug. 21, 2002 PACER
60

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by ARC, Stephen Kuziel, Kevin Ulsh, Stacey Reichenbach, Lucien Greca, Ryan O'Kane, Matthew Vigorito, Sara Austin-Small, Paula Sage, Jacob Pratt, Mary Weglowski amending [1-1] complaint (Villano, P.)

Aug. 21, 2002 PACER
61

Intervenor's COMPLAINT by all plaintiffs against Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Villano, P.)

Aug. 21, 2002 PACER
58

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time until 9/13/02 to respond to Motion for Class Certification (Rodko, R.) Modified on 08/26/2002

Aug. 23, 2002 PACER
62

PROTECTIVE ORDER (signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Brown, S.)

Sept. 5, 2002 PACER
64

Discovery Conference held ( JGM) (Falcone, K.)

Sept. 10, 2002 PACER
63

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 9/17/02 to respond to Amended and Intervening Complaint (Rodko, R.)

Sept. 11, 2002 PACER
65

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time until 9/20/02 to respond to Motion for Class Certification (Rodko, R.) Modified on 09/17/2002

Sept. 13, 2002 PACER
66

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 9/20/02 to respond to Amended and Intervening Complaint (Rodko, R.)

Sept. 17, 2002 PACER
67

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Leave to File Reply Brief that Exceeds Page Limit (Brief Due 10/9/02 ) (Villano, P.)

Sept. 18, 2002 PACER
68

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Intervening Complaint (Brief Due 10/11/02 ) (Depino, F.)

Sept. 20, 2002 PACER
69

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in support of [68-1] motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Intervening Complaint (Depino, F.)

Sept. 20, 2002 PACER
70

MOTION by ARC to Extend Time until 7/2/03 to complete discovery (Falcone, K.)

Oct. 1, 2002 PACER
71

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker for Leave to File response to plaintiffs reply to memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification (Brief Due 10/23/02 ) (Depino, F.)

Oct. 2, 2002 PACER
72

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [47-1] motion for Class certification by all plaintiffs (Depino, F.)

Oct. 3, 2002 PACER
73

OBJECTIONS by all plaintiffs to [71-1] motion for Leave to File response to plaintiffs reply to memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara (Sherman, M.)

Oct. 8, 2002 PACER
74

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time to respond to the motion to dismiss (Sherman, M.)

Oct. 8, 2002 PACER
75

ORDER denying [68-1] motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Intervening Complaint ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Warner, R.)

Oct. 11, 2002 PACER
76

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Reconsideration of order dated 10/8/02 re: [71-1] motion for Leave to File response to plaintiffs reply to memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification (Brief Due 11/5/02 ) (Sherman, M.) Modified on 10/16/2002

Oct. 15, 2002 PACER
77

REPLY by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to response to [47-1] motion for Class certification by all plaintiffs (Warner, R.)

Oct. 22, 2002 PACER
78

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Entry of Default as to Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Sherman, M.)

Oct. 22, 2002 PACER
79

RESPONSE by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to [78-1] motion for Entry of Default as to Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker by all plaintiffs (Sherman, M.)

Oct. 25, 2002 PACER
80

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker for pre-motion Conference (Sherman, M.)

Oct. 28, 2002 PACER
81

MOTION by all plaintiffs for leave to File response to surreply in opposition to motion for class certification (Brief Due 11/20/02 ) (Sherman, M.) Modified on 10/31/2002

Oct. 30, 2002 PACER
82

RESPONSE by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to [81-1] motion for leave to File response to surreply in opposition to motion for class certification by all plaintiffs (Sherman, M.)

Nov. 6, 2002 PACER
83

ENDORSEMENT ORDER granting [81-1] motion for leave to File response to surreply in opposition to motion for class certification, denying [78-1] motion for Entry of Default as to Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, denying [76-1] motion for Reconsideration of order dated 10/8/02 re: [71-1] motion for Leave to File response to plaintiffs reply to memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.)

Nov. 14, 2002 PACER
84

SCHEDULING ORDER Motion Hearing set for 2:30 1/21/03 for [47-1] motion for Class certification ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.)

Nov. 14, 2002 PACER
85

REPLY by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to response to [47-1] motion for Class certification by all plaintiffs (Falcone, K.)

Dec. 9, 2002 PACER
90

LETTER dated 1/20/03 Regarding: Oral argument signed by Janet Bond Arterton (Torday, B.)

Jan. 20, 2003 PACER
86

Motion hearing held re: [47-1] motion for Class certification by all plaintiffs ( JBA) (Torday, B.)

Jan. 21, 2003 PACER
87

MOTION by all plaintiffs for enlargement of three months beyond the timelines setforth in the exsisting Scheduling Order (Falcone, K.)

Jan. 21, 2003 PACER
88

ORDER of referral to Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis for settlement conference conference (signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Warner, R.)

Jan. 23, 2003 PACER
89

SCHEDULING ORDER setting Discovery cutoff 10/21/03 ; Dispositive Motions due 11/20/03 ; Status Report by 9/9/03 . Trial Ready Date Set for 6/1/03 ( Signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.)

Jan. 24, 2003 PACER
92

LETTER dated 1/27/03 Regarding: proposed class definition by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Torday, B.)

Jan. 28, 2003 PACER
91

LETTER dated 1/24/03 Regarding: 2 matters at oral argument on 1/21/03 by all plaintiffs (Torday, B.) Modified on 01/29/2003

Jan. 29, 2003 PACER
93

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time to file Amended Complaint (date not specified); Discovery until 01/16/04; Motion for Summary Judgment until 02/17/04 (Rodko, R.)

Jan. 31, 2003 PACER
94

RULING granting [47-1] motion for Class certification ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) 2 Page(s) (Sherman, M.)

Jan. 31, 2003 PACER
95

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Leave to File supplemental memo in support of class certification (Depino, F.)

Feb. 3, 2003 PACER
96

LETTER dated 01/27/03 Regarding: proposed class definition by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Depino, F.)

Feb. 4, 2003 PACER
97

LETTER dated 1/28/03 Regarding: Mr. York's letter of 1/27/03 by all plaintiffs (Depino, F.)

Feb. 4, 2003 PACER
98

LETTER dated 1/28/03 Regarding: Mr. Shaw's 1/27/03 letter by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Depino, F.)

Feb. 4, 2003 PACER
99

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by ARC, Stephen Kuziel, Kevin Ulsh, Stacey Reichenbach, Lucien Greca, Ryan O'Kane, Matthew Vigorito, Sara Austin-Small, Paula Sage, Jacob Pratt, Mary Weglowski, Linda O'Neill, Heather Bouffard, Sean Bouffard, John Broderick, Jessica Connolly, Marcus Damiano, Carmella DePanfilis, Erin Hart, Robert Janelle III, Greg Knowles, Kathryn Merchant, Sarah Miller, Justin Seaver, Alicia Steinfeld, Connie Sullivan, Wendy Sullivan amending [60-1] amended complaint by plaintiffssssssssss (Depino, F.)

Feb. 6, 2003 PACER
100

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time until 2/6/03 to file second amended complaint (Sherman, M.)

Feb. 6, 2003 PACER
101

Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Sherman, M.)

Feb. 6, 2003 PACER

State / Territory: Connecticut

Case Type(s):

Public Benefits/Government Services

Special Collection(s):

Olmstead Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 2, 2001

Closing Date: 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Arc/Connecticut (a non-profit advocacy organization) and individuals with disabilities.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Peter H. O'Meara, State

Patricia A. Wilson−Coker, State

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Medicaid, 42 U.S.C §1396 (Title XIX of the Social Security Act)

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Benefit Source:

Medicaid