Case: Frederick L. v. Dept. of Public Welfare

2:00-cv-04510 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: Sept. 5, 2000

Closed Date: 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 5, 2000, a group of individuals with serious mental disabilities who were institutionalized as Norristown State Hospital ("NSH") filed suit against Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare and Pennsylvania's Secretary of Public Welfare under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and 42 U.S.C. §1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs, represented by public services counsel, asked the Court for declarato…

On September 5, 2000, a group of individuals with serious mental disabilities who were institutionalized as Norristown State Hospital ("NSH") filed suit against Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare and Pennsylvania's Secretary of Public Welfare under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and 42 U.S.C. §1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs, represented by public services counsel, asked the Court for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that because they were qualified and prepared for community-based services, their continued institutionalization violated the anti-discrimination and integration mandates of the ADA Act and the Rehabilitation Act.

On July 23, 2001, the Court (Judge Schiller) denied the defendants' motion to dismiss in part, allowing the plaintiffs to continue to pursue the Rehabilitation Act claims against both defendants, and the ADA and 1983 claims against the Secretary.

Following a three-day bench trial in May 2002, on September 5, 2002, the District Court (Judge Schiller) issued a memorandum opinion in favor of the defendants on the ground that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the requested relief because it would have required a fundamental alteration of the Commonwealth's programming and budgetary allocations.

The plaintiffs subsequently appealed. On April 13, 2004, the Third Circuit vacated the district court's judgment and remanded for further evaluation of the state's fundamental alteration defense.

On September 1, 2004, after reconsidering the defendants' defense, the district court (Judge Schiller) entered judgment in favor of defendants and closed the case. The Court found that the Commonwealth had in place a satisfactory "Olmstead Plan."

Summary Authors

Kunyi Zhang (3/12/2011)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11164304/parties/l-v-deptof-public-welf/


Judge(s)

Hart, Jacob P. (Pennsylvania)

Schiller, Berle M. (Pennsylvania)

Sloviter, Dolores Korman (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Meek, Robert W. (Pennsylvania)

Murphy, Mark J. (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Defendant

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:00-cv-04510

Docket

Sept. 26, 2006

Sept. 26, 2006

Docket
21

2:00-cv-04510

Opinion and Order (Motion to Dismiss Granted in part)

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

Order/Opinion

157 F.Supp.2d 509

62

2:00-cv-04510

Memorandum and Order (Judgment in Favor of Defendant in part)

Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

Order/Opinion

217 F.Supp.2d 581

02-03721

3rd Circuit Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

April 13, 2004

April 13, 2004

Order/Opinion

364 F.3d 487

76

2:00-cv-04510

Memorandum and Order (Judgment in favor of Defendants)

Sept. 1, 2004

Sept. 1, 2004

Order/Opinion

2004 WL 1945565

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11164304/l-v-deptof-public-welf/

Last updated April 7, 2025, 11:19 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link

Summons Issued

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER

Summons Issued

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER

Summons Issued

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER

Summons Issued

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER

Set/Clear Flags

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER

Set/Clear Flags

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER

Set/Clear Flags

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER

Set/Clear Flags

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER
1

Complaint

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER
1

Complaint

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER
1

Complaint

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER
1

Complaint

Sept. 5, 2000

Sept. 5, 2000

PACER
2

Summons Returned Executed

Nov. 16, 2000

Nov. 16, 2000

PACER
2

Summons Returned Executed

Nov. 16, 2000

Nov. 16, 2000

PACER
2

Summons Returned Executed

Nov. 16, 2000

Nov. 16, 2000

PACER
2

Summons Returned Executed

Nov. 16, 2000

Nov. 16, 2000

PACER
3

Motion to Certify Class

Nov. 21, 2000

Nov. 21, 2000

PACER
3

Motion to Certify Class

Nov. 21, 2000

Nov. 21, 2000

PACER
3

Motion to Certify Class

Nov. 21, 2000

Nov. 21, 2000

PACER
3

Motion to Certify Class

Nov. 21, 2000

Nov. 21, 2000

PACER
4

Motion to Dismiss

Nov. 27, 2000

Nov. 27, 2000

PACER
4

Motion to Dismiss

Nov. 27, 2000

Nov. 27, 2000

PACER
4

Motion to Dismiss

Nov. 27, 2000

Nov. 27, 2000

PACER
4

Motion to Dismiss

Nov. 27, 2000

Nov. 27, 2000

PACER
5

Order

Nov. 30, 2000

Nov. 30, 2000

PACER
5

Order

Nov. 30, 2000

Nov. 30, 2000

PACER
5

Order

Nov. 30, 2000

Nov. 30, 2000

PACER
5

Order

Nov. 30, 2000

Nov. 30, 2000

PACER
6

Motion to Stay

Dec. 7, 2000

Dec. 7, 2000

PACER
6

Motion to Stay

Dec. 7, 2000

Dec. 7, 2000

PACER
6

Motion to Stay

Dec. 7, 2000

Dec. 7, 2000

PACER
6

Motion to Stay

Dec. 7, 2000

Dec. 7, 2000

PACER
7

Response to Motion

Dec. 18, 2000

Dec. 18, 2000

PACER
7

Response to Motion

Dec. 18, 2000

Dec. 18, 2000

PACER
7

Response to Motion

Dec. 18, 2000

Dec. 18, 2000

PACER
7

Response to Motion

Dec. 18, 2000

Dec. 18, 2000

PACER
8

Suspense Order

Dec. 19, 2000

Dec. 19, 2000

PACER
8

Suspense Order

Dec. 19, 2000

Dec. 19, 2000

PACER
8

Suspense Order

Dec. 19, 2000

Dec. 19, 2000

PACER
8

Suspense Order

Dec. 19, 2000

Dec. 19, 2000

PACER
9

Memorandum

March 22, 2001

March 22, 2001

PACER
9

Memorandum

March 22, 2001

March 22, 2001

PACER
9

Memorandum

March 22, 2001

March 22, 2001

PACER
9

Memorandum

March 22, 2001

March 22, 2001

PACER
10

Miscellaneous Document

March 22, 2001

March 22, 2001

PACER
10

Miscellaneous Document

March 22, 2001

March 22, 2001

PACER
10

Miscellaneous Document

March 22, 2001

March 22, 2001

PACER
10

Miscellaneous Document

March 22, 2001

March 22, 2001

PACER
11

Order

March 23, 2001

March 23, 2001

PACER
11

Order

March 23, 2001

March 23, 2001

PACER
11

Order

March 23, 2001

March 23, 2001

PACER
11

Order

March 23, 2001

March 23, 2001

PACER
12

Order

March 28, 2001

March 28, 2001

PACER
12

Order

March 28, 2001

March 28, 2001

PACER
12

Order

March 28, 2001

March 28, 2001

PACER
12

Order

March 28, 2001

March 28, 2001

PACER
13

Memorandum

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

PACER
13

Memorandum

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

PACER
13

Memorandum

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

PACER
13

Memorandum

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

PACER
14

Minutes - Miscellaneous

April 26, 2001

April 26, 2001

PACER
14

Minutes - Miscellaneous

April 26, 2001

April 26, 2001

PACER
14

Minutes - Miscellaneous

April 26, 2001

April 26, 2001

PACER
14

Minutes - Miscellaneous

April 26, 2001

April 26, 2001

PACER
15

Amended Complaint

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
15

Amended Complaint

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
15

Amended Complaint

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
15

Amended Complaint

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
16

Memorandum

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
16

Memorandum

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
16

Memorandum

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
16

Memorandum

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
17

Memorandum

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
17

Memorandum

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
17

Memorandum

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
17

Memorandum

May 4, 2001

May 4, 2001

PACER
18

Motion to Dismiss

May 11, 2001

May 11, 2001

PACER
18

Motion to Dismiss

May 11, 2001

May 11, 2001

PACER
18

Motion to Dismiss

May 11, 2001

May 11, 2001

PACER
18

Motion to Dismiss

May 11, 2001

May 11, 2001

PACER
19

Memorandum

May 18, 2001

May 18, 2001

PACER
19

Memorandum

May 18, 2001

May 18, 2001

PACER
19

Memorandum

May 18, 2001

May 18, 2001

PACER
19

Memorandum

May 18, 2001

May 18, 2001

PACER
20

Transcript - No PDF

June 11, 2001

June 11, 2001

PACER
20

Transcript - No PDF

June 11, 2001

June 11, 2001

PACER
20

Transcript - No PDF

June 11, 2001

June 11, 2001

PACER
20

Transcript - No PDF

June 11, 2001

June 11, 2001

PACER
21

Order

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

PACER
21

Order

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

PACER
21

Order

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

PACER
21

Order

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

PACER
22

Order

Aug. 8, 2001

Aug. 8, 2001

PACER
22

Order

Aug. 8, 2001

Aug. 8, 2001

PACER
22

Order

Aug. 8, 2001

Aug. 8, 2001

PACER
22

Order

Aug. 8, 2001

Aug. 8, 2001

PACER
23

Memorandum

Sept. 6, 2001

Sept. 6, 2001

PACER
23

Memorandum

Sept. 6, 2001

Sept. 6, 2001

PACER
23

Memorandum

Sept. 6, 2001

Sept. 6, 2001

PACER
23

Memorandum

Sept. 6, 2001

Sept. 6, 2001

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Public Benefits/Government Services

Special Collection(s):

Olmstead Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 5, 2000

Closing Date: 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A group of individuals with serious mental illnesses who were residents of a state-run psychiatric hospital.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

NDRN/Protection & Advocacy Organizations

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, State

FEATHER O. HOUSTOUN IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WELFARE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, State

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Benefits (Source):

Medicaid