Case: Durrenberger v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

4:09-cv-00786 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Filed Date: March 10, 2009

Closed Date: 2011

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 10, 2009, Plaintiff filed a civil rights action against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Chapter 121 of the Texas Human Resources Code, in the U.S. District Court Simeon for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. Plaintiff is a person with a physical disability that causes a hearing impairment. Because TDCJ's facility did not provide accommodations for him…

On March 10, 2009, Plaintiff filed a civil rights action against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Chapter 121 of the Texas Human Resources Code, in the U.S. District Court Simeon for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. Plaintiff is a person with a physical disability that causes a hearing impairment. Because TDCJ's facility did not provide accommodations for him, and other persons with hearing disabilities, Plaintiff claimed that the lack of accommodations denied him the ability to participate in TDCJ's inmate visitation program. Represented by attorneys from the Texas Civil Rights Project, Plaintiff asked the Court for declaratory and injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, costs, and litigation expenses against Defendant TDCJ. District , presided over the case.

Plaintiff's complaint was later amended on June 03, 2009. On September 24, 2010, both parties filed motions for summary judgment. On December 2, 2010, in a published opinion, the Court (Judge Simeon Timothy Lake, III) granted Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in part and denied it in part. Judge Lake ruled that the undisputed facts showed that TDCJ discriminated against Plaintiff based on his disability by failing to provide simple, inexpensive accommodation, such as allowing Plaintiff to conduct his visits in an attorney visit booth, or placing a low-cost volume amplifier in the telephones. Judge Lake noted that TDCJ failed to present any evidence whatsoever that accommodating Plaintiff would impose any significant financial or administrative burden.

On January 04, 2011, TDCJ filed a motion for reconsideration. Judge Lake denied the motion for reconsideration on January 24, 2011. Four days later, Judge Lake issued an order approving a settlement between the parties. On May 24, 2011, after a settlement was completed, the case was dismissed with prejudice. The terms of the settlement are not available.

Summary Authors

Xin Chen (10/11/2011)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4397297/parties/durrenberger-v-texas-department-of-criminal-justice/


Judge(s)

Lake, Simeon Timothy III (Texas)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Barton, Peter Joel (Texas)

Harrington, James C (Texas)

Izzo, Lauren (Texas)

Krause, Wayne Nicholas (Texas)

Attorney for Defendant

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

4:09-cv-00786

Docket

May 24, 2011

May 24, 2011

Docket
9

4:09-cv-00786

First Amended Complaint

June 3, 2009

June 3, 2009

Complaint
40

4:09-cv-00786

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

Sept. 24, 2010

Sept. 24, 2010

Pleading / Motion / Brief
41

4:09-cv-00786

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment

Sept. 24, 2010

Sept. 24, 2010

Pleading / Motion / Brief
45

4:09-cv-00786

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Dec. 2, 2010

Dec. 2, 2010

Order/Opinion

757 F.Supp.2d 640

51

4:09-cv-00786

Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting Durrenberger's Motion for Summary Judgment

Jan. 4, 2011

Jan. 4, 2011

Pleading / Motion / Brief
54

4:09-cv-00786

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Jan. 24, 2011

Jan. 24, 2011

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4397297/durrenberger-v-texas-department-of-criminal-justice/

Last updated Nov. 29, 2025, 4:09 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

Complaint

March 10, 2009

March 10, 2009

2

Order for Initial Conference and Disclosure

March 17, 2009

March 17, 2009

3

Return of Service Executed

March 24, 2009

March 24, 2009

4

Return of Service Executed

March 24, 2009

March 24, 2009

5

Return of Service Unexecuted

April 2, 2009

April 2, 2009

6

Return of Service Executed

April 8, 2009

April 8, 2009

7

Answer to Complaint

April 13, 2009

April 13, 2009

8

Certificate of Interested Parties

May 4, 2009

May 4, 2009

9

Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc.

June 3, 2009

June 3, 2009

RECAP
10

Motion to Amend

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

June 3, 2009

June 3, 2009

RECAP
11

Notice of Appearance

June 3, 2009

June 3, 2009

12

Order on Motion to Amend

June 4, 2009

June 4, 2009

13

Order for Initial Conference and Disclosure

June 12, 2009

June 12, 2009

14

Answer to Amended Complaint

June 15, 2009

June 15, 2009

15

Notice (Other)

June 19, 2009

June 19, 2009

16

Certificate of Interested Parties

June 24, 2009

June 24, 2009

17

JointDiscovery/Case Management Plan

July 14, 2009

July 14, 2009

18

Minute Entry Order

July 24, 2009

July 24, 2009

19

Scheduling Order

July 24, 2009

July 24, 2009

20

Notice (Other)

Sept. 15, 2009

Sept. 15, 2009

21

Notice (Other)

Dec. 11, 2009

Dec. 11, 2009

22

Motion to Compel

Jan. 21, 2010

Jan. 21, 2010

23

Response to Motion

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Jan. 29, 2010

Jan. 29, 2010

24

Order on Motion to Compel

Feb. 1, 2010

Feb. 1, 2010

RECAP
25

Motion for Extension of Time

Feb. 5, 2010

Feb. 5, 2010

26

Designation of Expert Witness List

Feb. 5, 2010

Feb. 5, 2010

27

Advisory

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

Feb. 8, 2010

Feb. 8, 2010

28

Motion for Extension of Time

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Feb. 18, 2010

Feb. 18, 2010

29

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

Feb. 19, 2010

Feb. 19, 2010

30

Notice (Other)

March 9, 2010

March 9, 2010

31

Motion for Extension of Time

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

March 26, 2010

March 26, 2010

32

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

March 29, 2010

March 29, 2010

33

Motion for Extension of Time

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

March 30, 2010

March 30, 2010

34

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

March 31, 2010

March 31, 2010

35

Motion for Extension of Time

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

April 13, 2010

April 13, 2010

36

Order

April 14, 2010

April 14, 2010

37

Notice (Other)

June 8, 2010

June 8, 2010

38

Notice (Other)

June 24, 2010

June 24, 2010

39

Notice (Other)

July 26, 2010

July 26, 2010

40

Motion for Summary Judgment

1 Appendix

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 24, 2010

Sept. 24, 2010

41

Motion for Summary Judgment

1 Exhibit Exhibits A-F

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Exhibits G-H

View on PACER

3 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 24, 2010

Sept. 24, 2010

42

Response to Motion

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 14, 2010

Oct. 14, 2010

43

Response to Motion

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 15, 2010

Oct. 15, 2010

44

Reply to Response to Motion

Oct. 27, 2010

Oct. 27, 2010

45

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Denying 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/4/2011, Docket Call set for 2/11/2011 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake.(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(hcarr, )

Dec. 2, 2010

Dec. 2, 2010

RECAP
46

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Dec. 3, 2010

Dec. 3, 2010

47

Motion to Substitute Attorney

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Dec. 3, 2010

Dec. 3, 2010

48

Order on Motion to Substitute Attorney

Dec. 6, 2010

Dec. 6, 2010

49

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Dec. 6, 2010

Dec. 6, 2010

50

Motion for Attorney Fees

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F

View on PACER

7 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Dec. 22, 2010

Dec. 22, 2010

51

Motion for Reconsideration

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Jan. 4, 2011

Jan. 4, 2011

52

Response to Motion

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Jan. 11, 2011

Jan. 11, 2011

53

Supplement

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Jan. 13, 2011

Jan. 13, 2011

54

Memorandum and Opinion

Jan. 24, 2011

Jan. 24, 2011

55

Notice of Settlement

1 Proposed Order

View on PACER

Jan. 27, 2011

Jan. 27, 2011

56

Order

Jan. 28, 2011

Jan. 28, 2011

Case Details

State / Territory:

Texas

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 10, 2009

Closing Date: 2011

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff is a person with a physical disability that causes a hearing impairment.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, State

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Texas 4:09-cv-00786

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Issues

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Visiting