Filed Date: Oct. 1, 2013
Closed Date: 2015
Clearinghouse coding complete
On October 1, 2013, three same-sex couples and the minor child of one of the couples filed a lawsuit against Kanawha County, West Virginia in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. The plaintiffs, represented by Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, asked the court to declare unconstitutional any West Virginia laws banning same-sex marriage, to enjoin West Virginia from refusing to recognize same-sex marriages undertaken in other states, and to award the plaintiffs reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit.
The plaintiffs claimed that their rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the United States Constitution were violated. They further asserted that the ban on same-sex marriage discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation, sex, and parental status. The plaintiffs also alleged that they were being denied a multitude of other social and legal rights that marriage provides.
On December 2, 2013, the Court (Judge Robert C. Chambers) granted the State of West Virginia's Motion to intervene as a defendant. On January 29, 2014, The District Court (Robert C. Chambers, Chief Judge) held that: the Court would consider the case law, but not legal argument, contained in untimely notice of supplemental authority filed by plaintiffs; the action did not present difficult questions of state law, therefore the case would remain in federal court; the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge constitutionality of the non-recognition statute, however, the plaintiffs were allowed to challenge the other parts the West Virginia marriage ban. 993 F. Supp .2d 639.
The Court stayed the case on June 10, 2014, pending the outcome of Bostic v. Schafer, a Fourth Circuit case that had a substantial overlap in issues with McGee v. Cole. The holding in Bostic, that same-sex marriage bans are unconstitutional, controlled this case.
On November 7, 2014, the Court, in keeping with Bostic, applied strict scrutiny to the marriage ban and found that it was not narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest, and decided in favor of the plaintiffs. It issued an opinion and order that granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, while denying the State of West Virginia's motion to dismiss. In the order, the Court disagreed that there would be uniformity problems regarding the enforcement of the marriage ban across the counties of West Virginia. While the defendants claimed that the decision would only ban the named clerks from denying same-sex couples marriage licenses, the Court found that would not be the case. The Court further held that the marriage ban was not a narrowly-tailored state interest and that it violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. The case ended on November 7, 2014.
On July 16, 2015, Judge Chambers awarded the plaintiffs $92,125 in attorneys’ fees, including paralegal fees, and $7,679.64 in costs and expenses. The case is now closed.
Summary Authors
Megan Dolan (2/16/2015)
Claire Lally (3/15/2015)
Mary Kate Sickel (3/25/2018)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5525202/parties/mcgee-v-cole/
Chambers, Robert Charles (West Virginia)
Bailey, Charles R. (West Virginia)
Hall, Lee Murray (West Virginia)
Blake, Julie Marie (West Virginia)
Dys, Jeremiah G. (West Virginia)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5525202/mcgee-v-cole/
Last updated Oct. 17, 2025, 6:38 a.m.
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Public Benefits/Government Services
Special Collection(s):
Multi-LexSum (in sample)
Same-Sex Marriage
Key Dates
Filing Date: Oct. 1, 2013
Closing Date: 2015
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Three lesbian and gay couples, one with a child, who are residents of West Virginia.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Cabell County Clerk (Cabell), State
Kanawha County Clerk (Kanawha), State
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Constitutional Clause(s):
Other Dockets:
Southern District of West Virginia 3:13-cv-24068
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Content of Injunction:
Amount Defendant Pays: $99,804.64
Issues
General/Misc.:
Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)
Discrimination Basis:
LGBTQ+: