Filed Date: April 22, 2013
Closed Date: Jan. 15, 2015
Clearinghouse coding complete
On April 22, 2013, an inmate of the Nebraska Department of Corrections and his intended spouse filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court in the District of Nebraska under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Nebraska Department of Corrections. The plaintiffs represented themselves pro se and claimed that their constitutional rights guaranteed by the First Amendment, Due Process Clause, and Equal Protection Clause had been violated. They asked the court to allow the transgender plaintiff to change the sex listed on her birth certificate, to allow her to marry the male plaintiff, for the free plaintiff to gain visitation rights to the incarcerated plaintiff, and for the plaintiffs to be allowed to wear hats during Quaker religious ceremonies.
One half of the plaintiff couple is an inmate who wished to marry the other half the couple, who is a transgender woman and a former inmate in the facility in which the other plaint still resides. This prison does not allow former inmates to visit those that are still incarcerated for a period three years after their release unless there is an immediate family relationship. The plaintiffs claim that this restriction on visitation interferes with their First Amendment right to freedom of association, and that Nebraska's ban on same-sex marriage violated their constitutional rights under the Equal Protection and Due Process Clause. They further allege that their inability to marry denies the couple many benefits that married couples enjoy.
On April 17, 2014, the court (Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf) ordered that all the plaintiffs' claims were dismissed except the one alleging interference of First Amendment rights, which was allowed to proceed to service of process. Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf stated that the plaintiffs' motion to allow the wearing of hats for religious reasons was unrelated to the to the claims alleged in the complaint, and that the plaintiffs must address this claim in a separate action.
On November 3, 2014, plaintiffs' complaint and amended complaint were dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. The plaintiffs appealed, but the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals determined their appeal to be untimely on January 15, 2015. The case is now closed.
Summary Authors
Megan Dolan (8/5/2014)
Elizabeth Heise (10/7/2018)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4306136/parties/wilson-v-hopkins/
Kopf, Richard George (Nebraska)
Citta, Kyle J. (Nebraska)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4306136/wilson-v-hopkins/
Last updated Aug. 3, 2025, 12:47 a.m.
State / Territory: Nebraska
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: April 22, 2013
Closing Date: Jan. 15, 2015
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Plaintiff is a male inmate of the Nebraska Department of Corrections who wishes to marry a transgender woman who was a former inmate at the same prison, and to be free to associate with each other as immediate family members before the mandatory three year waiting period for released inmates.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: No
Filed Pro Se: Yes
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Defendant Type(s):
Facility Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Constitutional Clause(s):
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Defendant
Nature of Relief:
Source of Relief:
Issues
General/Misc.:
Discrimination Basis:
Affected Sex/Gender(s):
Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:
LGBTQ+: